[Next message][Back to index]
[ecrea] UK: The future of small scale radio - publication of research report for Ofcom
Wed Jul 06 15:38:08 GMT 2011
*The future of small scale radio - A research report for Ofcom
*Prepared by Essential Research, July 2011*
Full report (72 pages, 861 kb) at:
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/radio-research/smallradio.pdf
*
Other Ofcom Radio Rsearch documents available at
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/radio-research/
*
Summary of Key Findings*:
Small-scale radio services are highly valued by their listeners. They
foster a real sense of belonging and listeners have a unique affection
for them. These feelings of affection and value were most pronounced in
areas where larger local stations have been re-branded and some
listeners perceive that they have lost their local feel. In addition,
small-scale services offer benefits to their listeners that are not
provided by other radio stations.
These benefits are three-fold:
. Micro local information
. Quirky entertainment
. Local identity
It is not just about what these stations broadcast, but what they
represent to their communities that make them so special to their
listeners. They do not necessarily listen to these stations for long
periods of time, but their level of engagement is higher than with most
other stations. There were three areas, however, where small-scale
stations were not able to deliver to the same level as larger stations:
. National news and sport
. Experienced DJs
. Spoken word shows
Despite the many shared benefits that small-scale stations have,
community and small commercial stations have a very different feel from
each other, meaning they appeal and deliver these benefits in different
ways. Community stations have the most personal and familiar feel, with
listeners feeling a real bond between them and their station. The DJs
are often from the local community and use language and accents that
listeners are familiar with. However, the somewhat amateur air that can
sometimes be associated with these stations can make them seem
unprofessional at times and, as a result, put some younger listeners off.
The music offering on community stations is considered very alternative
by listeners, due to the specialist music shows and the unsigned local
bands that are featured. This alternative music selection leads to
appointment to listen, but means most listeners will tend not to tune in
on an ad hoc basis, as the music often will not appeal to everyone.
Community stations are considered very active in their local areas,
going beyond promotion and support and really getting involved in their
community.
They provide training and work experience, as well as encouraging
community members to volunteer and go to events locally. Listeners feel
that with more self-promotion more people will experience the benefits
of these stations. On small commercial stations the DJs are considered
more professional. The local feel comes mainly from the high level of
local information that they provide. They are the preferred destination
for this type of information, especially in emergencies. Their music
offering is considered much more mainstream than on community stations,
but with a quirky juxtaposition of songs. This output does not encourage
appointment to listen, but means listeners can tune in whenever they
feel like it and usually enjoy the playlist. Small commercial stations
are often well known within their local areas and go way beyond their
remit when it comes to community involvement.
They are considered very good at promoting and supporting local
businesses and events, but some listeners felt they could get more
actively involved with their communities putting their high profiles to
good use. Should financial difficulties require changes to the way
stations are regulated in the future, listeners to small-scale stations
are only willing to compromise on elements that don't affect the
identity of the station. All small-scale stations are considered by
listeners to be 'community' stations (regardless of their licence type)
as this is the focal point of such stations.
As a result, listeners would prefer new services to be 'not-for-profit'
(under current legislation, therefore, licensed as community radio
services). These are more likely to remain local, because of the single
ownership limit, which means they cannot be bought by larger radio
groups. However, in order for them to remain sustainable in the future,
listeners understand the importance of local advertising as part of
their funding mix. Greater commercial income generation was therefore
considered to be acceptable as a way of protecting the localness and
sense of community that small-scale stations have, whilst making sure
they remain sustainable in the future. Tied into wider economic issues,
by the end of the field research period (early 2011), small-scale
listeners had become much more open to the idea of compromise than they
were at the start, some six months earlier.
As long as these changes don't fundamentally alter the identity of the
station, listeners accept that they could help such stations remain
sustainable in the future. Listeners felt that increased on-air local
commercial activity and sponsorship would not threaten the identity of
their small-scale stations to any great extent, and this proposal was
therefore well-received as a potential policy adjustment. Potential
associated benefits were also recognised - local businesses could
promote themselves further and community members would be more aware of
what was on offer in their local area. Increased spot advertising was
more of a problem however. It was not felt to bring any benefits, and
small commercial stations in particular were considered to have a great
deal of advertising already. A broader music selection was not a huge
problem for small commercial stations, as their music selection was
considered quite mainstream already. Providing they could still provide
a quirky mix within these playlists, this would be acceptable as
potential policy adjustment.
For community stations however, this would change the identity of the
station as their music selection is so alternative. As a result
community listeners were not willing to compromise here. A reduced focus
on local issues and less station participation were also potential
policy adjustments that listeners were not willing to compromise on.
Both of these elements were felt to be integral to the identity of
small-scale stations. To obtain local information was one of the main
reasons listeners tuned into their small-scale station and the
participation by a station in its community was where its main value
lay. If either of these potential policy adjustments were to go ahead,
listeners felt that they would lose engagement with their small-scale
stations and ultimately stop listening.
[Next message][Back to index]