[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[ecrea] CfP: INsPIrE «Media Education and Citizenship»
Sun Apr 08 08:35:37 GMT 2018
***
CfP: INsPIrE International Conference (and further publication) «Media
Education and Citizenship»
22 June 2018
IHECS – Brussels (Belgium)
Online:
http://engageurope.eu/call-for-papers-international-conference-on-media-education-and-citizenship/
1. Argument:
A reflection on journalism cannot be conducted independently from a
reflection on democracy, because they are strongly interlinked
(Muhlmann, 2004; Perret, 2007). At the heart of this relationship is a
dual challenge, the terms of which are interdependent: to bring the
debate to life and to weave common ground. The media thus fully
participate in the « conflictual building of the political community »
(Mulhmann, 2004, p.11). In Europe, traditional media are increasingly
weakened and denounced by citizens as incapable of fostering this
pluralism (Verfaillie, 2013; European Commission, 2016). The financial
crisis of the press is fuelling a more general crisis in the
socio-political and cultural representation of our societies. Many
researchers have focused on the media coverage of disadvantaged urban
areas – in the suburbs or in central neighbourhoods according to urban
configurations (Lochard, 2002; Gandonnière, 2002; Garcin-Marrou, 2005;
Vieillard-Baron, 2011), identity construction in the media (Lacalle,
2008 & 2012; Lochard & Popelard, 2012; Simelio, 2015), and in particular
the stereotypes by which an urban mythology of the « youth » has been
constructed (Longhi, 2011; Lacalle, 2013). Those analyses point out the
performativity of media discourses, and refer to the “mediapolis”
(Deuze, 2009; Silverstone, 2007; de Jong and Schuilenburg, 2006),
defined as “a comprehensively mediated public space where media
underpin and overarch the experiences and expressions of everyday life”
(Deuze, 2009). Thus, according to Deuze, “a perspective on life lived
in, rather than with, media can and perhaps should be the ontological
benchmark for a 21st-century media studies” (Ibid., p.137).
It must be said that diversity policies promoted by the European Union,
the states or by the media companies themselves, essentially
quantitative and translated by quotas, have not initiated any real
change (Macé, 2009) in media representations, for lack of integration
into the organizational and journalistic culture. The target audiences
of these policies remain media objects (Zerouala, 2015, p.31), certainly
more visible, but locked in dominant heteronomous representations. The
media are therefore “at the center of a balance of power, a game of
interactional forces bringing together information professionals, public
authorities and inhabitants of peripheral urban areas, developing
autonomous strategies that oppose them” (Lochard, 2002, p.31-32).
Jacinthe Mazzerachi thus identifies four (non-exclusive) types of
behaviours adopted by young people to exist in the city: withdrawal,
individual affirmation, the logic of gangs and territories, and
religious logic (Mazzocchetti, 2012). We can summarise them in two
opposite movements: one of disengagement / disinvestment, the other of
commitment / appropriation. These movements, observed more widely among
citizens of all ages, make it possible to apprehend the different
conceptions of media and education. In particular, they raise questions
about their common role in fostering pluralism and democracy, which is
the focus of different strands of media research, for instance on
constructive and solutions journalism (Wenzel, Gerson and Moreno, 2016).
The role of high education in social inclusion has been usually
addressed in terms of individual access and academic success (Gidley,
Hampson, Wheeler and Bereded-Samuel, 2010; Brundenius, Göransson and
Carvalho de Mello, 2017). However, the high education can also be
grasped as a driving force for local social projects. Interlinked with
non-formal education in a holistic perspective of lifelong learning (La
Belle, 1982), high education institutions develop innovative projects in
partnership with civil society for fostering emancipation. The
development of digital media and ICTs are interesting tools for
supporting those projects.
The proposals for INsPIrE conference may follow the following thematic
pillars: The first pillar discusses the principles, practices,
aesthetics and impact of “citizen media”. The second pillar concerns the
role of media education in active citizenship. The third one proposes a
reflection on the relations between high education and civil society.
Communication proposals can be presented either as reflexive analyses
based on empirical research, or as analyses of professional
communication practices – testimonies about practices and analysis of
the conditions of the action, its justifications, and its consequences.
2. Indicative bibliography
• Brundenius C., Göransson B., Carvalho de Mello J. (eds) (2017)
Universities, Inclusive Development and Social Innovation, Springer, Cham.
• Cardon, D., Granjon, F. (2003) Les mobilisations informationnelles
dans le mouvement altermondialiste, Colloque Les Mobilisations
altermondialistes, Paris, 3-5 décembre 2003.
• De Jong A, Schuilenburg M (2006) Mediapolis: Popular Culture and the
City. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
• Deuze, M. (2011) Media life, Media, Culture and Society, 33(1), 137-148.
• European Commission (2016) Media Pluralism and Democracy, Special
Eurobarometer 452, 23 November 2016.
• Gandonnière, P. (2002) Demain, les banlieues du monde…, Images et
discours sur la banlieue, Toulouse, France: ERES, 85-110. • Gidley, J.
M., Hampson, G. P., Wheeler, L., & Bereded-Samuel, E. (2010) From access
to success: An integrated approach to quality higher education informed
by social inclusion theory and practice, Higher Education Policy, 23(1),
123–147.
• La Belle, T. (1982) Formal, Nonformal and Informal Education: A
Holistic Perspective on Lifelong Learning, International Review of
Education / Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft /
Revue Internationale De L'Education, 28(2), 159-175. • Lacalle, Ch.
(2013). Jóvenes y ficción televisiva. Construcción de identidad y
transmedialidad, Barcelona: UOCPress, 2013.
• Lacalle, Ch. (2012). La construction de l’étranger à la télévision
espagnole. In Lochard, G. & Popelard M. D, Images de l'étranger, Paris:
L’Harmattan, 2012, 127-141.
• Lochard, G. & Popelard M. D. (2012) Images de l'étrange, Paris,
L’Harmattan, 2012.
• Lochard, G. (2002) La « question de la banlieue » à la télévision
française: Mise en place et évolution d'un conflit de representations,
Images et discours sur la banlieue, Toulouse, France: ERES, 31-41. •
Macé, E. (2009) Mesurer les effets de l’ethnoracialisation dans les
programmes de télévision : limites et apports de l’approche quantitative
de la « diversité », Réseaux, vol. 157-158, no. 5, 233-265.
• Mazzocheti J. (2012) Sentiments d’injustice et théorie du complot.
Représentations d’adolescents migrants et issus des migrations
africaines (Maroc et Afrique subsaharienne) dans des quartiers précaires
de Bruxelles, Brussels Studies, n°63.
• Muhlmann G. (2004) Du journalisme en démocratie, Payot.
• Rosen, J. (2012) What are Journalists For ? Yale University Press.
• Silverstone, R. (2007) Media and Morality: On the Rise of the
Mediapolis. Cambridge: Polity.
• Simelio, N. (2015) España Proyecto de Monitoreo Global de Medios.
Informe Nacional. WACC.
• Verfaillie B. (2013) Les francais, les médias et les journalistes. La
confiance saigne… Alliance internationale des journalistes, Coll.
Journalisme responsible.
• Vieillard-Baron H. (2011) Banlieue, quartier, ghetto : de l’ambiguïté
des définitions aux représentations, Nouvelle revue de psychosociologie,
2011/2 n° 12, 27-40.
• Wenzel, A., Gerson, D., & Moreno, E. (2016) Engaging Communities
Through Solutions Journalism, Columbia Journalism Review. Zerouala F.
(2015) Médias en banlieue, de l’autre côté du miroir, Mouvements 2015/3
(n° 83), 29-34.
3. Languages
The languages of the conference are English and French.
4. Expected communication proposals and submission procedure
Proposals must be sent to us before the 6th of May 2018 by email:
(esther.durin /at/ galilee.be)
Next to an abstract of between 1,000 and 1,500 character (sent in a .doc
format), proposals must include: the name, professional or academic
status, the institutional attachment, and the contact details of the
author(s) (emails and mail addresses).
Participation is free of charge.
A publication will follow the conference.
5. Scientific committee
• Elena ABRUDAN - Chair of the Journalism Department Faculty of
Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeș-Bolyai
University, Cluj-Napoca.
• Rareș BEURAN, Lecturer, Faculty of Political, Administrative and
Communication Sciences, Babeș-Bolyai University.
• Iris DE ROOVER, Chair of the Journalism Department, Thomas More Mechelen.
• Esther DURIN, Lecturer, Institut des Hautes Etudes des Communications
Sociales/ PhD Student, Praxiling - UMR 5267 CNRS - Université de
Montpellier 3.
• Maria Rosario LACALLE ZALDUENDO, Chair of the Journalism and
Communication Department, University Autonomous of Barcelona.
• Laura LEPRÊTRE, Lecturer, Institut des Hautes Etudes des
Communications Sociales, Brussels.
• Cristina NISTOR, Lecturer and coordinator of Journalism studies in
English Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences
Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca.
• Kiron PATKA, Lecturer, Center for Media Competence, University of Tübingen
• Cristina PUJOL, Lecturer, University Autonomous of Barcelona.
• Barbara SCHOFIELD, Senior Lecturer in Journalism, City, University of
London
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please
use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at
http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]