[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[Commlist] Push: Childbirth in Global Screen Culture CFP
Mon Jan 10 13:43:39 GMT 2022
Push: Childbirth in Global Screen Culture CFP for edited collection
Editors: Amy C. Chambers, Xi W. Liu, Kate Taylor-Jones
Proposals due: 27th May 2022
The act of childbirth is a global experience and yet, on film, it often
remains hidden behind careful framing and a stereotypical and often
inaccurate imagination of this event. Muriel Zagha (2019) notes that
childbirth ‘remains a richly problematic object for film’ and to date,
there has been little sustained scholarly attention on this topic.
The experience has for the most part been heavily mediated via the lens
of cinematic genres, indeed, as Anne Carruther’s (2021) notes there it
is not really possible to neatly group and locate films that present a
gynae-narrative once the ‘supporting structures’ of genre conventions
are removed.
Horror studies has been one area where work has been done on images of
childbirth and gestation. However, all too often in this genre, the
pregnant person’s body is positioned as abject and their pain and
suffering offered up for spectatorial enjoyment. Pregnancy horror or
gynaehorror as termed by Erin Harrington (2018), is also explored by a
number of scholars including Amanda DiGioia (2017), Sarah Arnold (2013),
Kelly Oliver (2012), and Lucy Fischer (1996). For the Anglo-American
comedy genre (examples include Nine Months [Colombus, 1995], What to
Expect When You’re Expecting [Jones, 2012], Father of the Bride Part 2
[Shyer, 1995], Knocked Up [Apatow, 2007]), the breaking of water and the
uncontrollable nature of the gestating/labouring body is seen as itself
as a comic act. With the exception of Alice Lowe’s Prevenge (2016) and
Leigh Janiak’s Honeymoon (2014) these gynae-horrors and -comedies are
exclusively directed by men (see Chambers, 2020). Reality birthing
programs and documentaries such as One Born Every Minute (2010-2018,
Channel 4), woman-directed documentary films The Business of Being Born
(Eptein, 2008), and Birth Time (Hunter, Naylor, and Sutton, 2018) have
developed the spectrum of the visual of childbirth but it is one that
continues to enhance and promote the medical model of childbirth.
In comparison, films such as Pieces of a Woman (Mundrucz, 2021), Umameru
(Goda, 2010), and Roma (Cuarón, 2018) present a vision of ‘corporeal
normality’ (Carruthers, 2021:2) and woman directors such as Haimy
Assefa, Naomi Kawase, Luk Yee-sum have sought to approach the topic with
a more nuanced and interrogative lens. This is alongside fictional TV
dramas such as Birthcare Center/Sanhujoliwon (2020, tvN) that have
focused on exploring both pregnancy, birth and the postpartum period and
The Handmaid’s Tale (2017- , Hulu) that has placed the whole process as
part of the nightmare of dystopian state power.
This collection will seek to expand beyond mainstream and often solely
man-directed representations of pregnant and labouring bodies as abject
and monstrous and/or comic and uncontrollable. We are particularly
interested in chapters (solo or co-written) that include a global
perspectives that focus on potential topics such as:
• Socioeconomics of labour and childbirth
• Gendered experiences • Non-binary and trans experiences of childbirth
• The wider gestational journey and its impact on birth
• Defining childbirth in the cinematic frame
• Childbirth and narratives of nationhood
• The interplay between childbirth and educational policy features
We are especially interested in chapters with a focus on indigenous,
Latin American, Asian and African experiences to ensure a wider
understanding of the issues and to ensure a multiplicity of voices.
Initially we are after 300-word abstracts detailing the focus of the
proposed chapter and an indication of approach and a brief biographical
note. To ensure continuity and cross-engagement between the works the
plan is to run an online workshop between all the participants to ensure
peer to peer learning and development as the project continues.
This project is committed to ensuring meaningful change via a focus on
decolonisation practices and to provide a safe and supportive
environment for those working with us. We believe that there is an
urgent need to amplify and listen to marginalised voices and acknowledge
the need to develop and explore the wider structures that surround us.
We wish to firmly state our commitment to supporting the rights of
trans, non-binary, and gender diverse communities and their experiences
related to the topic we are working on.
Please note: since we wish to expand the discussion of childbirth beyond
the narrative of horror, essays that focus on mainstream Hollywood
examples such as Rosemary’s Baby (Polanski, 1968), Demon Seed (Fielding,
1977) The Brood (Cronenberg, 1979), Alien (Scott, 1979) and sequels, The
Terror Within (Notz, 1989), Alien Resurrection (Jeunet, 1997), and more
recent examples like A Quiet Place (Krasinski, 2018) will not be
considered. Similarly, we will not be interested in chapters where
analysis relies heavily upon Julia Kristeva's concept of abjection and
Barbara Creed’s monstrous-feminine and the monstrous womb/matrix.
Please email enquiries and proposals to (amy.c.chambers /at/ mmu.ac.uk) by 27th
May 2022.
https://amycchambers.com/2022/01/10/cfp-push/
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]