[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[Commlist] CFP: ICA 2025 Panel Against Technologies of Documentation: Queer and Trans Tactics of Resistance
Tue Oct 29 14:07:17 GMT 2024
Alexander Monea (George Mason University) is putting together a panel
with Whit Pow (NYU) titled "Against Technologies of Documentation: Queer
and Trans Tactics of Resistance" and we urgently need one more panelist
from outside the United States.
They are submitting to the LBGTQ Studies SIG at ICA 2025 that will take
place June 12-14 in Denver, CO. They are planning on a high-density
panel with 6 panelists giving 5–8-minute presentations and ample time
for discussion afterwards. Submissions are due on November 1, so they
would need a title and 400-word abstract by the morning of November 1st
to be able to submit everything on time.
Please feel free to reach out to Alexander ((amonea /at/ gmu.edu)) and Whit
((wpow /at/ nyu.edu)) for more information or to let us know that you'd be
interested in joining them. Please remember, they only have on spot open
on the panel and it has to go to a scholar from outside the United
States, per ICA's rules.
Attached below is a lengthier panel description:
This panel examines (1) the ways in which technologies of documentation
structure what can and cannot be known, said, and seen – what can and
cannot /exist/ – in communication mediated by information and
communication technologies, and (2) the ways that queer and trans
communities are impacted by and organize tactics of resistance to
technologies of documentation. For us, technologies of documentation
operate similarly to how Dean Spade describes administrative systems in
his book /Normal Life/, where he argues that administrative systems are
not merely “responsible for sorting and managing what ‘naturally’
exists,” but instead “actually invent and produce meaning for the
categories they administer, and that those categories manage both the
population and the distribution of security and vulnerability” (2015, p.
11). For Spade, these systems are capable of doing ‘administrative
violence,’ as they can exacerbate queer and trans precarity by rendering
parts of their lives and selves alternately visible and invisible.
Technologies of documentation work similarly to identify, categorize,
memorize, quantify, digitize, and aggregate people, places, and things.
Their practices are not ‘natural’, but instead are inflected by
preexisting sociocultural biases. As such, they have a propensity to
reinforce social hierarchy and marginalization. Our usage is
intentionally broad, as we see it applying to a broad range of hardware,
software, use cases, and user communities. For us, these technologies of
documentation can be productively investigated from the perspective of
queer and trans studies, whose facility in navigating plural, shifting,
and irreducibly individual gender and sexual identities positions these
fields well to explore the limitations and violence of technologies of
documentation.
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ commlist.org)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]