[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[ecrea] CFP: Whose information is it?
Sat Jul 19 04:51:09 GMT 2014
Whose Information Is It Anyway? In Search of a New Balance
A by-invitation experts’ workshop
New America Foundation and the Penn State Institute for Information Policy
September 10-12, 2014
CALL FOR PAPERS: DEADLINE EXTENDED TO JULY 25
Traditional notions of individual and public rights with respect to
information are being redefined across a broad front, raising profound
challenges to freedom of speech, assembly, association, and
communication. The aggregation, archiving and use of information also
have profound implications for the future of national security and
business strategy. Currently, decision-makers are responding to
capabilities enabled by new technologies, for which appropriate usage
norms have not yet emerged, and are struggling to formulate coherent
strategies addressing some fundamental questions. Can and should the
legitimate demands of border security, law and order and the prevention
of terrorism limit an individual's rights over personal and/or private
information? What restraints on the collection, aggregation and use of
personal information should exist? How do we balance the principles of
zones of personal privacy, the right to control one’s most personal
information, and ownership rights over digital media, with the benefits
of vibrant markets in information goods and services? Is there a
general right to have one’s personal information removed from all
commercial digital databases? Are there practical models that respect
human dignity without crippling data aggregators?
Vociferous information ownership debates are taking place in the
copyright and intellectual property fields as well. The digitization of
content has enabled access to works that have not been in circulation
for years, if not centuries. Yet some copyright/IP holders have
suggested that works in the public domain, if not actively defended,
should be privatized, and works that currently benefit from the
time-limited protection of law for the public’s benefit should become
the permanent property of private rights holders, effectively ending the
“public domain.” There are modest examples of alternatives: the Open
Source community; the Creative Commons/ copyleft movement; the
increasing emergence of collaborative no-charge academic journals, etc.
What are the practical models that strengthen the public domain, and
still provide sufficient incentives for creative productions?
We've heard the traditional answers to these questions and invite
prospective authors to comment in an independent, scholarly, and
innovative way on topics regarding control of information in the 21st
Century. Multidisciplinary approaches are encouraged that combine
theory and evidence to evolve integrative and long-term perspectives on
information rights.
The Institute for Information Policy (IIP) at Penn State and the X-Lab
at the New America Foundation (NAF) are pleased to announce this call
for papers that offer new (or updated) perspectives and theories about
the balance between the rights of individuals, states, businesses and
the public in information and personal data. Authors of selected papers
will be invited to present them during a three day, invitation-only
workshop designed to bring together a diverse group of experts and to be
held at the New America Foundation in Washington, DC. This Workshop is
the 9th in a series of events on “Making Policy Research Accessible,”
organized by the IIP, with the support of the Ford Foundation and the
Media Democracy Fund. Presenters at the workshop will be invited to
submit their completed papers for review by the Journal of Information
Policy (www.jip-online.org). The workshop will take place on September
10-12, 2014, the days leading to the 42nd annual TPRC conference.
Invited topics include, but are not limited to:
· Information policy and national security
· Balancing privacy and security
· Data mining and privacy
· The SOPA/PIPA debate aftermath
· New avenues for academic publishing
· Personal freedoms in the digital age
· Cybersecurity
· Patent reform and patent “trolls”
· Individual ownership of personal information
· The “right to be forgotten”
· The relationship of government agencies and data-based enterprises
· New theories of digital intellectual property
· The future (if any) of the “first sale” doctrine
· Are we compromising our security? The U.S. role in data insecurity
· Are commercial/trade secrets the same as national security secrets?
· “Big Data,” AI, and data security and privacy in the inter-cloud
· Extraterritoriality of the U.S. I.P. regime
· Privacy and the “Internet of Things”
· Bio-enhancements and privacy
· Smart infrastructure, surveillance, and privacy
Abstracts of up to 500 words and a short bio of the author(s) should be
submitted to
(pennstateiip /at/ psu.edu) by July 25, 2014. Please write IIPXLABWS: YOUR NAME
in the subject line. Abstracts not sent according to the above
instructions will not be reviewed. Accepted presenters will be notified
by August 1, 2014.
---------------
ECREA-Mailing list
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier and ECREA.
--
To subscribe, post or unsubscribe, please visit
http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
--
ECREA - European Communication Research and Education Association
Chauss�de Waterloo 1151, 1180 Uccle, Belgium
Email: (info /at/ ecrea.eu)
URL: http://www.ecrea.eu
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]