[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[ecrea] CFP Affective Capitalism / ephemera journal
Thu Jun 19 20:40:22 GMT 2014
CALL FOR PAPERS
Affective Capitalism
submission deadline
31 dec 2014
http://www.ephemerajournal.org/content/affective-capitalism
Issue Editors: Tero Karppi, Anu Laukkanen, Mona Mannevuo, Mari Pajala,
Tanja Sihvonen
This special issue aims at describing and understanding the regime of
‘affective capitalism’. In cultural theory, affect is a useful concept
for analysing how something stimulates our body and mind. Affect makes
us act, exceeding or preceding rationality. In our daily lives we are
constantly affected by a plethora of things: our work, our friends, our
surroundings, our technologies (Gregg and Seigworth, 2010).
Unsurprisingly, perhaps, we are seeing attempts to capture affect in
different fields of contemporary culture, from labour to social networks
to politics. In these contexts, affect and affection are extensively
organized, produced and maintained for the needs of capitalism.
Affective capitalism is lucrative, tempting and even devious. The notion
of affect dovetails with operations of power (Kenny, Muhr and Olaison,
2011). It merges with established therapeutic discourses and blurs the
limits of intimacy at work (Ross, 2004; Illouz, 2007; Gregg, 2011). We
are being induced to act in order for companies to make profits in a
market economy. Affective capitalism transforms us into assets, goods
and services by appealing to our desires, needs and social
relationships, or by making us act on mere gut-feeling.
There is no single definition of affect theory; on the contrary, affect
theory builds bridges between humanities, neurosciences, emotion studies
and organization studies. It goes from Spinoza’s philosophy to Tomkins’
psychology and beyond (Sedgwick, 2003; Figlerowicz, 2012.) Similarly,
affective capitalism operates in different areas of sense and
experience, human and non-human alike. By mapping different areas where
affective capitalism operates, we therefore hope to contribute to
understanding its form and function and the relations of power it
currently maintains.
In contemporary management theory, a fulfilling relationship towards
vocation is usually described through affects such as love and passion.
In feminist and cultural studies, however, there has been a growing
interest in the question of how love and capitalism are connected
(Illouz, 2012; Berlant, 2008; 2011). Elsewhere, Michael Hardt (2011) and
other autonomist Marxist theorists have suggested that love nonetheless
has the potential to overcome capitalism. It seems, then, that affect is
a productive tool for critically discussing the contemporary ‘spirit of
capitalism’ and its ways of merging with managerial techniques
(Boltanski and Chiapello, 2007). The concept of affect helps us to
examine how our intimate dreams, hopes and fears work as a fuel in the
cycles of production.
Understanding how different forms of media and popular culture move us
affectively is crucial for understanding how they function to produce
economic value (Kavka, 2008; Skeggs and Wood, 2012). For example, social
media is a part of affective capitalism to the extent that it raises
questions about user engagement, targeted advertising, user-generated
content and consumer profiling based on big data (Coté and Pybus, 2007;
Gehl, 2013; Hearn, 2010a; Paasonen, 2011). But it is also important to
find instances where affects are not subsumed within the sphere of
exchange but may offer the potential for disrupting the dominant
symbolic order with ‘its economic and legitimating function’ (Skeggs,
2010: 34). Theoretical concepts such as affective labour (Hardt, 1999),
free labour (Terranova, 2000) and immaterial labour (Lazzarato, 1996)
have been used for making sense of work in the cultural industries,
including the work performed by users and audiences. At the same time,
the usefulness of these concepts has been questioned and their
application has been criticized for a lack of proper empirical
engagement with the specificity of cultural production (Dowling, 2007;
Gill and Pratt, 2008; Hesmondhalgh and Baker, 2008; Hearn, 2010b;
McRobbie, 2011).
These fields above are only a few examples where affective capitalism
plays a particular role. In each of them affective capitalism has its
own ambivalences and complexities. By analysing how affective capitalism
appears in different contexts and frameworks, we are seeking new ways to
understand and conceptually grasp it. At the same time, we ask how we
could resist it and develop alternatives to it. We therefore welcome
studies that explore affective capitalism in various forms and contexts.
We invite contributions that critically engage with related concepts
such as immaterial, affective and emotional labour, grounding their
usage in specific contexts and empirical case studies. Possible topics
include, but are not limited to the following:
* The affective dimensions of value creation, cultural production
and resistance
* Affective capitalism, actor-networks, and human and non-human
agencies
* The limits of the immaterial/affective labour theory (e.g.
feminist critique)
* Performance measurement and affect in contemporary management theory
* Therapy culture, capitalism and organizations (e.g. human
resource management)
* Commodification of social media users and networked relations
* Connections between affective capitalism and sharing economy
* Selfies, peer-2-peer financing systems, digital currencies,
self-quantifications and other technological mediations of affective
capitalism
* Ways of harnessing the experiential and affective qualities of
the arts (e.g. music, dance, visual arts) to enhance the productivity of
employees or marketing
* Forms of resistance and micropolitics in the networks of artists,
activists and researchers
* Branding the global university: affect, knowledge and capitalism
Deadline for submissions: 31 December 2014
All contributions should be submitted to the special issue editors at:
affcap AT utu.fi. Please note that three categories of contributions are
invited for the special issue: articles, notes and reviews. Information
about these types of contributions can be found at
http://www.ephemerajournal.org/call-for-papers. All submissions should
follow ephemera’s submission guidelines which are available at:
http://www.ephemerajournal.org/how-submit. Articles will undergo a
double blind review process. For further information please email:
affcap AT utu.fi.
References
Berlant, L. (2011) ‘A properly political concept of love: Three
approaches in ten pages’, Cultural Anthropology, 26(4): 683-691.
Berlant, L. (2008) The female complaint. Durham: Duke University Press.
Boltanski, L. and E. Chiapello (2007) The new spirit of capitalism.
London: Verso.
Coté, M. and J. Pybus (2007) ‘Learning to immaterial labour 2.0: MySpace
and social networks’, ephemera, 7(1): 88-106.
Dowling, E. (2007) ‘Producing the dining experience: Measure,
subjectivity and the affective worker’, ephemera, 7(1): 117-132.
Figlerowicz, M. (2012) ‘Affect theory dossier an introduction’, Qui
Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(2): 3-18.
Gehl, R. (2013) ‘What’s on your mind? Social media monopolies and
noopower’, First Monday, 18(3-4)
[http://firstmonday.org/article/view/4618/3421].
Gill, R. and A. Pratt (2008) ‘In the social factory? Immaterial labour,
precariousness and cultural work’, Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7-8): 1-30.
Gregg, M. (2011) Work’s intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gregg, M. and G.J. Seigworth (2010) ‘An Inventory of shimmers’, in M.
Gregg and GJ. Seigworth (eds.) The affect theory reader. Durham: Duke
University Press.
Hearn, A. (2010a) ‘Structuring feeling: Web 2.0, online ranking and
rating, and the digital “reputation” economy’, ephemera, 10(3/4): 421-438.
Hearn, A. (2010b) ‘Reality television, The Hills, and the limits of the
immaterial labour thesis’, Triple, 8(1), 60-76.
Hesmondhalgh, D. and S. Baker (2008) ’Creative work and emotional labour
in the television industry’, Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7-8): 97-118.
Hardt, M. (1999) ‘Affective labor’, Boundary 2, 26(2): 89-100.
Hardt, M. (2011) ‘For love or money’, Cultural Anthropology, 26(4): 676-682.
Illouz, E. (2012) Why love hurts: A sociological explanation. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
Illouz, E. (2007) Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kavka, M. (2008) Reality television, affect and intimacy: Reality
matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kenny, K., S.-L. Muhr and L. Olaison (2011) ‘The effect of affect:
Desire and politics in modern organizations’, ephemera, 11(3): 235-242.
Lazzarato, M. (1996) ‘Immaterial labor’, in P. Virno and M. Hardt (eds.)
Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics. Minneapolis: University
of Minnesota Press.
McRobbie A. (2011) ‘Reflections on feminism, immaterial labour and the
post-fordist regime’, New Formations, 70: 60-76.
Paasonen, S. (2011) Carnal Resonance: Affect and online pornography.
Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Ross, A. (2004) No collar: The humane workplace and its hidden costs.
Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sedgwick, E.K. (2003) Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy,
performativity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Skeggs, B. (2010) ‘The value of relationships: Affective scenes and
emotional performances’, Feminist Legal Studies, 18(1): 29-51.
Skeggs, B. and H. Wood (2012) Reacting to reality television:
Performance, audience and value. London: Routledge.
Terranova, T. (2000) ‘Free labor: Producing culture for the digital
economy’, Social Text, 63, 18(2): 33-57.
Keywords affect capitalism value labor network branding resistance
---------------
ECREA-Mailing list
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier and ECREA.
--
To subscribe, post or unsubscribe, please visit
http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
--
ECREA - European Communication Research and Education Association
Chauss�de Waterloo 1151, 1180 Uccle, Belgium
Email: (info /at/ ecrea.eu)
URL: http://www.ecrea.eu
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]