[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[ecrea] National Conference on Research Methodology in Journalism and Mass Communication: De-Westernizing Media Studies
Sun Oct 17 10:36:23 GMT 2010
>ICSSR FUNDED
>NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
>RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN JOURNALISM AND MASS
>COMMUNICATION: DEWESTERNIZING MEDIA STUDIES
>NOV 26-28, 2010
>
>Convener:
>C.S.H.N.Murthy Ph.D
>Associate Professor in Mass Communication and Journalism
>(cshnmurthy /at/ yahoo.co.in) or (cshnmurthy /at/ tezu.ernet.in)
>
>At
>Department of Journalism and Mass Communication
>School of Humanities and Social Sciences
>Tezpur University,
>Napam, Tezpur 784 028 Assam India
>
>NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN
>JOURNALISM AND MASS COMMUNICATION: DEWESTERNIZING MEDIA STUDIES
>
>Concept of Theme
>
>The need to hold a national level conference on
>the research methods to be pursued in journalism
>and mass communication in Indian universities
>and institutes has been felt for long. The
>reasons for such a feeling are not too far
>fetching. Firstly, many scholars in India who
>are into research/teaching of journalism and
>mass communication, either pursuing M.Phil/Ph.D
>or guiding others for M.Phil/Ph.D, are not in a
>position to publish their work in peer
>reviewed international or national journals due
>to several reasons. One reason being that the
>Western scholars, who do peer reviewing of
>Indian scholars research work (when submitted
>to international journals), do not have any
>grasp on the kind of research problems and
>research questions which the Indian scholars
>find appropriate/relevant to the Indian media
>studies. Secondly, these research papers may
>suffer from the lack of international
>references within which the peer reviewers
>expect the research work in question and
>methods to be situated. Thirdly, in Western
>media, there may not be problems or research
>questions which are identical to the Indian
>media issues as the cultural differences between
>India and the US or Europe are vast.
>
>Further, there has been a lingering feeling
>among Indian research scholars/ Professors,
>guiding research scholars for M.Phil and PhD
>programs in media studies, that they have been
>compelled to follow the Western methods of media
>research though India, by virtue of its varying
>cultures and enormous diversity, offers a vast
>landscape, rather to say mediascape in the
>words of Professor Appadurai, to develop
>research methods appropriate to native cultures.
>All this contributed either overtly or covertly
>to shroud the quality of research wok being
>pursued in journalism and mass communication
>departments in Indian universities/institutes.
>
>Further, some scholars in India, trained in the
>US/UK, believe that Indian research in
>journalism and mass communication lacked in the
>rigors of methodology to be acceptable as a
>standard work compatible with western methods
>(such as quantitative techniques as one can put
>it politely) of research into media studies.
>Therefore a lot of research work being carried
>out under M.Phil/Ph.D programmes in India goes
>unreported in any peer reviewed journals of
>repute such as Media Asia, Asian Journal of
>Communication (published by NTU, Singapore) or
>Global Media and Communication (published by
>Sage) . Some of the reviewers of these
>journals clearly show a western bias in their peer review comments.
>
>In fact, long ago J.S.Yadava (1980) proposed a
>research method called Sadharanikaran to study
>the issues related to Indian media
>research.(Yadava, J.S. (1987). Communication in
>India: The tenets of Sadharanikaran. In D.L.
>Kincaid (Ed.), Communication Theory: Eastern and
>Western Perspectives, pp. 161- 171. San Diego, CA: Academic Press).
>
>In the last 18th AMIC (Association of Media
>Information and Communication) International
>Conference held in New Delhi last year (Oct
>17-19, 2009), many eminent speakers such as
>Professor Epem and Professor Binod C Agarwal
>exhorted the need to develop research methods in
>media studies relevant to the Indian national
>and regional contexts. In fact Professor Epem
>and Professor Kiran Thakur even argued for
>focusing research on regional media than on
>national media. Both of them expressed the
>view that the eagerness of the media scholars
>and their supervisors to focus research on
>national media or mainstream media is
>marginalizing the importance of regional media
>which in fact is churning out more content in
>different formats than the mainstream media.
>
>The need for having an indigenous research
>methodology for media research (-ers) in India
>is not an exclusive view held by a few of Indian
>scholars. James Curran and Myung Jin Park in
>their famous work De-westernizing Media
>Studies (2000 Routledge) makes the case that
>the study of media should strive to extricate
>itself from ethnocentric perspectives,
>essentially western in orientation and hue, and
>seek-as Curran says in his Introduction: Beyond
>Globalization Theory-to broaden media theory
>and understanding in a way that takes account of
>experience of countries outside Anglo-American
>Orbit. (Watson J:Media Communication-An
>Introduction to Theory and Practice. 2nd
>edition. 2003). Prof.Daya Kishan Thussu of
>University of Westminster, London and
>Prof.Indrajit Banerjee of Nanyang Technological
>University, Singapore were a few more eminent
>speakers who advocated the need to
>de-westernize the media studies. (D.K. Thussu:
>13-31, 2009) and recourse to local paradigms.
>
>There are several laterals to this complex but
>highly important issue. Firstly, media scholars
>of European countries have abandoned rather
>rejected the quantitative methods of Professor
>George Gerbner in media research (Divina
>Frau-Meigs: Media Regulation Self-Regulation and
>Education in Ed. Cecilia von Feilitzen and Ulla
>Carlson in Promote or Protect? , p27: 2007).
>
>Most of the scholars in the Europe pursuing
>research in media studies are pursuing
>qualitative communication research techniques
>(Euro-Atlanta Model of Research) and yet could
>manage to produce high standard research work
>worth publishing in international
>journals. They formed their own regional (among
>European nations) and national level (country
>wise) editorial teams and journals (e.g.
>Nordicom Journal Edited by Ulla Carlsson,
>Romanian Journal of Journalism and Communication
>edited by Raluca Radu, Quaderns del CAC Edited
>by Montilla Castillo Silva, Journal of
>Communication Studies Edited by Joao Carlos
>Correia, etc), which gained the international
>acceptance both at the level of international
>and national conferences/publication of journals and papers.
>
>Though India is ten times larger than the
>European Union, we have not yet developed a
>national level body of eminent media scholars
>from different universities to constitute an
>editors panel for a national level peer reviewed
>journal/conference. In fact such media scholars
>panels could be constituted even region wise
>also for different peer reviewed media journals
>and peer reviewed conferences. Nor we are in a
>position to formulate a national level consensus
>on relevant research methods to be pursued in
>media research. As a result of this, most of the
>media research, barring a few, is not getting
>published in any international journals.
>The present conference is therefore very much
>pertinent at this time to invite eminent media
>scholars and Professors together with media
>academics and professionals to discuss the
>issues-identified under sub-themes given below,
>threadbare as to why we, in India, are unable to
>identify appropriate research methods relevant
>to Indian media studies at the height of the
>campaign emanating from elsewhere calling for
>de-westernizing the media studies. Such a
>discussion and consequent emerging consensus not
>only lead for an introspection of the quality of
>research work being pursued in Indian media
>studies but also pave the way for formulating
>national standards in research on media studies.
>
>The conference, further, expects to form a panel
>of editors to establish a peer reviewed
>international journal with the collaboration of
>Sage or Taylor and Francis (Routledge) from
>India side. It also engages a debate on the need
>to bring a consensus among the media scholars
>and Professors as to the relevance and necessity
>to follow the quantitative techniques involving
>distributive statistics in the media studies. It
>also acts as an important platform to discuss as
>to how the media scholars have to overcome the
>lack of reference materials which would have
>otherwise placed their work in international situation/broad scenario.
>
>At present there is a great dearth of reference
>materials for researching on Indian media
>issues as also on different/diverse cultural
>aspects of India. Most of the reference
>materials available in India are largely
>published in the West on Western media issues,
>and therefore, may not be relevant in terms of
>research methods we need to follow in respect
>of Indian media studies. For instance an
>analysis of Indian reality shows can not be
>based on the reference materials or published
>works produced by the British or the US media
>scholars on the reality shows which are shown in
>Britain or the US. In fact the Western research
>approaches to the Internet content or social
>networks cannot be applied to Indian social
>networking as our social networking has a
>different cultural ethos and limitations of content.
>
>The conference, therefore, proposes to lay
>out unambiguous terms for initial normative
>research in different fields of media studies in
>India without relying first on any bulk
>reference materials or previous literature
>review. After a few years of publishing such
>works, perhaps, Indian scholars could develop
>reference materials relevant to the Indian media studies.
>
>The conference therefore would like to
>deliberate on the above theme with the following
>sub-themes in the form of paper presentations
>and panel discussions during the three days of the conference.
>
>Sub-themes
>
>1. What could be de-westernizing media
>studies and how to use it in terms of the
>following research areas? Content analysis,
>Analysis of Rhetoric and Whistle blowing with
>reference to survey methods and triangulation
>methods, ethnographic studies, etc.
>
>2. What could be the theoretical frame
>works sufficient enough to examine local
>paradigms such as Regional Print/Electronic
>Media Comparative studies on format, structure,
>web and hard copy selection of news content,
>news production processes, influence of market,
>politics and others on news production in news rooms, regulations, ethics, etc.
>
>3. What could be native methods of research
>on Regional Cinema/National Cinema?-Comparative
>studies in film studies in terms of film forms,
>narratives, genres, theories and aesthetics, semiotics and cultural studies.
>
>4. What could be the appropriate research
>methods for Cultural studies Comparative
>studies and Cross cultural
>communication-Fashion, Life Styles, Internet,
>Semiotics& traditions, cross cultural trends,
>Religion, Tourism and Travel, etc. with emphasis
>on nation-state and container theories of
>cross cultural settings. Application of concepts
>of de-westernizing and internationalizing media research.
>
>5. How should the native research methods
>relate to Communication research in other
>fields: Agriculture, Health, Science and Technology, Business and Sports, etc.
>
>****
>
>List of Speakers/Chairpersons (Proposed/Confirmed)
>
>1. Prof. B.P.Sanjay, Vice-Chancellor, Tamil
>Nadu Open University, Thiruvayar, Tamil Nadu.(Proposed)
>2. Prof.Chandrabhanu Pattanayak,
>Himagirinabh University, Dehradun, UP. (Confirmed)
>3. Prof.Keval J Kumar, International
>Institute of Business and Media, Pune. (Proposed)
>4. Prof.Dr.Kiran Thakur, Professor in
>Communication, Flame School of Communication, Pune. (Confirmed)
>5. Prof.Dr.N.K.Trikha, School of Journalism
>and Mass Communication, Institute of Management Studies, Noida UP.(Proposed)
>6. Prof.K.V.Nagaraj, Assam University, Silchar. (Confirmed)
>7. Prof.Vinod Pavrala, Sarojini Naidu
>School of Performing Arts, University of
>Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad.(Proposed)
>8. Prof.Govinda Raju, Manonmanian Sundarnar
>University, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu. (Proposed)
>9. Prof.IArul Aram, Dept of Media Sciences,
>College of Engineering, Anna University, Guindy, Chennai. (Proposed)
>
>Call for Papers (CfP)
>
>Extended abstracts/proposals for panel
>discussions are welcome from media scholars
>faculty and professionals-pursuing media
>research in India or on fellowships from abroad
>on any of the following sub-themes, but not
>limited to them, in not more than 1200-1500
>words. For submission of an abstract/proposal
>for a panel discussion Ph.D is neither a
>mandatory requirement nor considered an
>important eligibility. What is required is full
>participation of academic fraternity in media
>research with serious scope and concern for this them/sub-themes.
>These abstracts could be on the current methods
>applied in their research or their illustrative
>understanding of the appropriateness of research
>methods concerning specific domain or area enlisted in the sub-themes above.
>
>Senior faculty members who have considerable
>insight into media research though do not hold a
>Ph.D or M.Phil, and emeritus Professors who had
>guided scholars for Ph.D programmes in the past
>are also welcome to send the abstracts/proposals
>for the conference on the above lines.
>
>The abstracts/proposals should clearly state the following:
>
>i. The area chosen for the study
>ii. The level-regional or mainstream
>iii. Which methodology is suitable for the
>chosen area of media studies by the scholar? Is
>it own methodology or duplication of other scholars methods?
>iv. Why (justification)?
>v. Does it require de-westernized
>approach or does it fit into the existing
>western models of research in media studies?
>vi. Does the chosen area of media research
>get relevant references within Indian context?
>vii. How far the western referencing is
>helpful for the research in chosen area?
>
>The abstracts and proposals should be sent to
>the Convener: C.S.H.N.Murthy Ph.D, Associate
>Professor in Mass Communication and Journalism,
>Department of Mass Commuunication and
>Journalism, Tezpur University, Napam, Tezpur 784
>028 Assam, India. (cshnmurthy /at/ yahoo.co.in) or (cshnmurthy /at/ tezu.ernet.in)
>
>Schedule of Conference
>
>Notification of Conference: Oct 13, 2010
>Due date for Submission of Abstracts/proposals
>for panel discussion: Oct 31, 2010
>Notification of acceptance of abstracts: Nov 5, 2010
>Due date for submission of full papers not exceeding 3000 words: Nov 15, 2010
>
>Registration Fee Rs. 1250/-per person
>
>Those willing to participate may kindly send a
>Registration fee of Rs. 1250/- in the name of
>The Registrar, Tezpur University, Napaam 784 028
>Tezpur Assam India and e-mail the copy of the
>DD along with your willingness to
>participate/present paper in the conference to
>the convener: Dr.CSHN Murthy, Associate
>Professor in Mass Communication and Journalism,
>Tezpur University, Tezpur at the e-mail id:
>(cshnmurthy /at/ yahoo.co.in) / (cshnmurthy /at/ gmail.com)
>registering them to attend the conference. Last
>date for receiving the registration fees is Nov 1st,2010.
>
>They must give the following details in their e-mail without fail.
>
>1. Name 2. Designation 3. Student/Research
>Scholar/Research Guide 4. Will present an
>abstract/paper at the conference? 5. Will only
>participate in conference as a delegate? 6.
>Title of the abstract/paper to be presented 7.
>E-mail id 8. Mobile No for Contact 9. Full address to contact.
>
>The Registration fee to be paid on or before the
>deadline Nov 1, 2010 to enable us to make
>arrangements for your accommodation and food.
>
>Program of Conference
>Duration of Programme: 3 days (Nov 26, 27 and 28, 2010)
>Nov 26, 2010 Day 1-Evening Session
>5.30 Inaugural ceremony of conference
>
>05.30 pm Prayer goes in to air followed by lighting of lamp
>6 pm VCs Inaugural Address
>6.30- 6.45 pm Pro-VCs Welcome Address to the audience
>6.50- 7 pm Registrars Greetings
>7.05 -7.15 pm Dr.Abhijit Bora,HODs Introduction to the Conference
>7.15 pm to 7.30 pm Tea break
>7.35pm - 8 pm Dr.CSHN Murthy, Convener and
>Co-ordinator -Getting Started-Warming up for De-Westernizing Media Studies.
>8.05 to 8.20-Inviting a faculty and a student
>representative to speak on the themes of the conference.
>8.25 pm Vote of Thanks By Prof.Anbarasan
>
>Nov 27, 2010 Day 2-Saturday Forenoon Session
>
>9-11.30am -- First Session of all the 5sub-themes-Paper Presentations
>11.30 am-11.45 am Tea break
>11.50 am-1pm -- Second Session of all the 6-sub-themes-Paper presentations.
>1-2 pm Lunch Break
>2 -3.30 pm -- Third Session of all the 5 sub-themes. Paper presentations
>3.30-3.45 pm Tea break
>3.50 pm 5 pm Interactive Session with the
>Delegates by the Students of MJMC 3rd Sem of all the 6 sub-themes.
>
>6pm to 8pm Cultural Programs
>
>Nov 28, 2010 Day 2 Sunday-Forenoon Session
>
>8.30am-10.30am Fifth Session of all the 6 sub-themes-Paper Presentations
>10.35-10.55 am Tea break
>11 am-1 pm Sixth Session of all the 6-sub-themes-Paper presentations.
>1-2 pm Lunch Break
>2 -3.30 pm -- Reporting of the outcomes of all
>the VI Sessions of all the 5 sub-themes
>3.30-4 pm Tea break
>
>5.30 pm -7.30pm Valedictory Ceremony and Vote of Thanks to all the delegates.
>5.30-6 pm Dean SH& SS Valedictory Address
>6 pm- 6.30 pm Conveners concluding remarks over
>the outcomes of the conference.
>6.35 pm to 6.45 pm. Ms. Joya Chakravarthy --Vote of Thanks.
>
>***
----------------
ECREA-Mailing list
----------------
This mailing list is a free service from ECREA.
---
To unsubscribe, please visit http://www.ecrea.eu/mailinglist
---
ECREA - European Communication Research and Education Association
Postal address:
ECREA
Université Libre de Bruxelles
c/o Dept. of Information and Communication Sciences
CP123, avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, b-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
Email: (info /at/ ecrea.eu)
URL: http://www.ecrea.eu
----------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]