(From 2002 until 2005, this mailing list was called the ECCR mailing list)
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[eccr] The Weekly Spin, Thursday, October 21, 2004
Fri Oct 22 11:08:55 GMT 2004
>THE WEEKLY SPIN, Thursday, October 21, 2004
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>sponsored by the Center for Media and Democracy (www.prwatch.org)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to
>further information about current public relations campaigns.
>It is emailed free each Wednesday to subscribers.
>
>SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS)
>Who do you know who might want to receive Spin of the Week?
>Help us grow our subscriber list! Just forward this message to
>people you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link:
>
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>THIS WEEK'S NEWS
>
>1. Journalists Unhappy With Election Coverage
>2. A Pre-Emptive Election Challenge
>3. Florida Revisited
>4. Mistakes Happen
>5. To Err Is Human, Says E-Voting Group
>6. Bush vs. the Laureates
>7. Junk Mailers Meet Ms. Brand America
>8. The Multimedia Election
>9. Faith-Based Presidency
>10. Sinclair's Journalism From Above
>11. Beware Lobbyists on Drugs
>12. Jailed for Blogging
>13. Ketchum Rated Reporters on "No Child Left Behind"
>14. Opening the Doors to Open Source Intelligence
>15. Hurrah for Alhurrah
>16. Knocking Rock the Vote
>17. Pfizer Doesn't Send Him Flowers, Anymore
>18. Ketchum Touts the Spirit of Davos
>19. Video News Releases: They're Everywhere!
>20. Bush Appointees Understand Industry
>21. Reach Out and Disenfranchise Someone
>22. Fake Blogs, True Buzz
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>1. JOURNALISTS UNHAPPY WITH ELECTION COVERAGE
>http://www.journalism.org/resources/research/reports/campaign2004/ccjcamp2004/default.asp
> The Committee of Concerned Journalists, a consortium of reporters,
> editors, producers, publishers, owners and academics, has surveyed
> its own membership about the quality of election campaign coverage
> this year, and the results aren't pretty. Nearly three quarters of
> respondents gave the press a C, D or F grade, and only 3% gave an
> A. By large majorities they felt the news media has become
> sidetracked by trivial issues, has been too reactive and has
> focused too much on campaign strategy rather than substance. They
> gave particularly low grades to television and much higher grades
> to newspapers and online coverage. The online news sites in fact
> got more A grades than any other medium - a notable improvement in
> the internet's reputation relative to other information sources.
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1098363833
>
>2. A PRE-EMPTIVE ELECTION CHALLENGE
>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Kerry-Day-After-Strategy.html
> Regretting Al Gore's quick concession in 2000, "Democrats are
> already laying the public relations groundwork [for a protracted
> election challenge] by pointing to every possible voting
> irregularity before the Nov. 2 election and accusing Republicans of
> wrongdoing." The Kerry campaign will have "six so-called 'SWAT
> teams' of lawyers and political operatives ... situated around the
> country with fueled-up jets awaiting Kerry's orders to speed to a
> battleground state." While lawyers are mounting legal challenges,
> "political operatives will try to shape public perception," saying
> that "Kerry has the best claim to the presidency and that
> Republicans are trying to steal it."
>SOURCE: Associated Press, October 21, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1098331200
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1098331200
>
>3. FLORIDA REVISITED
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/markosmoulitsas/story/0,15139,1331610,00.html?gusrc=rss
> Within an hour after voting began in Florida, "the system collapsed
> in Broward County, ground zero for the 2000 fiasco in the state,"
> comments Markos Moulitsas. He lists other allegations of election
> fraud and voter suppression in states including Nevada, Ohio,
> Wisconsin, New Hampshire and South Dakota, On his Dkosopedia
> website, Moulitsas is hosting a "Voter Registration Fraud
> Clearinghouse, where people are invited to report irregularities.
>SOURCE: Guardian (UK), October 20, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1098244800
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1098244800
>
>4. MISTAKES HAPPEN
>http://www.regrettheerror.com/
> A new weblog, "Regret the Error," is devoted solely to reporting on
> newspaper errors.
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1098210656
>
>5. TO ERR IS HUMAN, SAYS E-VOTING GROUP
>http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/19/HNvotingproblems_1.html?source=rss&url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/19/HNvotingproblems_1.html
> To "help journalists put election equipment-related snafus in
> context," the Information Technology Association of America, which
> includes several electronic voting machine manufacturers, is
> circulating a media primer. "The document outlines a number of
> woeful election day scenarios, from missing voter registrations to
> incorrect ballot information and nonfunctioning electronic voting
> machines. In each case, the ITAA offers possible explanations for
> the mishap, often with the effect of exonerating the voting
> machine." ITAA senior vice president Bob Cohen said one goal of
> their outreach is for journalists to "not always assume that
> problems with voting are due to failures of electronic voting
> technology."
>SOURCE: InfoWorld, October 19, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1098158402
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1098158402
>
>6. BUSH VS. THE LAUREATES
>http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/19/science/19poli.html
> "For nearly four years, and with rising intensity, scientists in
> and out of government have criticized the Bush administration,
> saying it has selected or suppressed research findings to suit
> preset policies, skewed advisory panels or ignored unwelcome
> advice, and quashed discussion within federal research agencies,"
> reports Andrew Revkin. The clash has been especially intense and
> prolonged regarding the issue of global warming, where "scientists
> say that objective and relevant information is ignored or distorted
> in service of pre-established policy goals. Scientists were
> essentially locked out of important internal White House debates;
> candidates for advisory panels were asked about their politics as
> well as their scientific work; and the White House exerted broad
> control over how scientific findings were to be presented in public
> reports or news releases."
>SOURCE: New York Times, October 19, 2004
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1098158401
>
>7. JUNK MAILERS MEET MS. BRAND AMERICA
>http://www.dmnews.com/cgi-bin/artprevbot.cgi?article_id=30769
> Last year, former advertising executive Charlotte Beersresigned
> from her job as head of a U.S. State Department effort to improve
> America's image in the Middle East. This week she spoke to another
> group with image problems - direct marketers, the people who send
> you junk mail and other unwanted commercial solicitations. Beers
> gave them the same advice she gave "brand America": they should
> "tell positive stories about what direct marketing is about."
>SOURCE: DM News, October 19, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1098158400
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1098158400
>
>8. THE MULTIMEDIA ELECTION
>http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&aid=73019
> "Hardly a day goes by without someone sending me a link to a video,
> Flash animation, or MP3 file related to the U.S. political
> campaign," obsserves Steve Yelvington. "It's the first time that
> multimedia files have been so thoroughly woven through the national
> political conversation. JibJab's hilarious animations, "This Land"
> and "Good to Be in D.C.," have been widely covered, but there's
> much more. PBS has placed its excellent biodocumentary, "The Choice
> 2004," on the Web for online viewing. Jon Stewart's skewering of
> CNN's Crossfire is posted all over the Web (although not at
> CNN.com). The polemic "Stolen Honor: John Kerrys Record of
> Betrayal," which is at the center of the Sinclair Broadcasting
> controversy, is available for pay-per-view downloading. There's
> widespread use of video in user-generated content, too, led off by
> entries in a contest earlier this year sponsored by the political
> action group MoveOn.org.
>SOURCE: Poynter online, October 18, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1098072000
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1098072000
>
>9. FAITH-BASED PRESIDENCY
>http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html?oref=login&pagewanted=print&position=
> "In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire
> that the White House didn't like about Bush's former communications
> director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to
> Bush," journalist Ron Suskind writes. "He expressed the White
> House's displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time
> I didn't fully comprehend - but which I now believe gets to the
> very heart of the Bush presidency. The aide said that guys like me
> were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he
> defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your
> judicious study of discernible reality.' I nodded and murmured
> something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me
> off. 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he
> continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own
> reality. And while you're studying that reality - judiciously, as
> you will - we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you
> can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's
> actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what
> we do.'"
>SOURCE: New York Times Magazine, October 17, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097985600
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097985600
>
>10. SINCLAIR'S JOURNALISM FROM ABOVE
>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0410160112oct16,1,151711.story
> The Sinclair Broadcast Group, the single largest operator of local
> television stations in the United States, has gained notoriety
> after ordering its 62 local stations to preempt prime time
> programming to broadcast an anti-Kerry film a few days before the
> November 2, 2004 general election. The order has prompted criticism
> that Sinclair is "failing federal broadcast requirements to reflect
> local interests ... a section of federal law that requires media
> companies to cover local issues and provide an outlet for local
> voices," reports Leon Lazaroff. The order to run the anti-Kerry
> program is simply the latest example of how it imposes its
> political will on its local affiliates. "The company increasingly
> uses 'distance-casting' whereby local news, sports and weather is
> uniformly broadcast to its many stations from Sinclair's
> headquarters in suburban Baltimore," Lazaroff writes. "Television
> viewers receive on-camera reports from 'News Central' that appear
> to be coming from local stations. Sinclair spokesman Mark Hyman
> delivers conservative commentary that must be carried on local news
> reports."
>SOURCE: Chicago Tribune, October 16, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097899203
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097899203
>
>11. BEWARE LOBBYISTS ON DRUGS
>http://www.saturdaygazettemail.com/section/APNews/News/ap0490n
> "When federal regulators started to scrutinize the safety record of
> dietary supplements sold by Metabolife International Inc., the
> company turned to the influential Washington lobbying and law shop
> of Patton Boggs. ... For years, Patton Boggs earned millions
> helping project reassurances to Congress and its customers that
> Metabolife products were safe." As health concerns mounted, "Patton
> Boggs lobbyist Lanny Davis wrote a senator whose subcommittee was
> investigating Metabolife that the company had received only 78
> 'unproven, anecdotal allegations' of strokes, heart attacks,
> seizures and deaths." The actual number of health complaints was in
> the thousands.
>SOURCE: Associated Press, October 16, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097899202
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097899202
>
>12. JAILED FOR BLOGGING
>http://www.juancole.com/2004_10_01_juancole_archive.html#109795689940545757
> Juan Cole reports that Omid Memarian, an Iranian writer,
> journalist, weblogger and social activist has been arrested, making
> him the fourth journalist to be arrested in an apparent Iranian
> crackdown on reformist journalists and webloggers who are seen as
> enemies of the regime. Cole urges people to complain to the Iranian
> government or their interests section in Washington, DC.
>SOURCE: Informed Comment weblog, October 16, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097899201
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097899201
>
>13. KETCHUM RATED REPORTERS ON "NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND"
>http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/16/politics/16educ.html
> The U.S. Education Department paid $700,000 to the Ketchum public
> relations and marketing firm, to produce two video news releases
> and to rate newspaper coverage according to how favorably reporters
> described the Bush administration's No Child Left Behind law in
> 2003. Democratic Senators Frank R. Lautenberg and Edward M. Kennedy
> have criticized the Ketchum contract as "an illegal use of taxpayer
> funds. ... A comprehensive, nationwide media study identifying
> journalists and news organizations writing favorable stories on
> President Bush and his political party's commitment to education
> has only a political purpose."
>SOURCE: New York Times, October 16, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097899200
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097899200
>
>14. OPENING THE DOORS TO OPEN SOURCE INTELLIGENCE
>http://ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1097814155.php
> The official report of the 9/11 Commission includes a pitch for a
> new "open-source intelligence agency," which would focus on
> developing government intelligence information from unrestricted,
> non-secret sources. "The intelligence world lives and breathes by
> secrecy, perhaps more so than is necessary," observes Charles
> Cameron. "In a world that's shifting in a thousand ways from the
> hierarchical to the distributed, from the top-down to the
> bottom-up, and - gasp - from the authoritative to the democratic, a
> more transparent approach to intelligence may be the wave of the
> future, and open-source intelligence may be the key to that
> effort."
>SOURCE: Online Journalism Review, October 15, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097812801
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097812801
>
>15. HURRAH FOR ALHURRAH
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33564-2004Oct14.html
> Alhurrah, the U.S.-funded Arabic-language TV channel, offers a more
> pro-U.S. version of the news than other Arabic channels but is
> having a hard time reaching many viewers because of the perception
> that it is American propaganda. Mouafac Harb, Alhurra's news
> director bristles at this claim. But as U.S. Rep. José E. Serrano
> (D-N.Y.) said at a hearing in April, that's exactly why Congress is
> funding it. "Do not tell us it's not propaganda, because if it's
> not propaganda, then I think ... we will have to look at what it is
> we are doing," Serrano said.
>SOURCE: Washington Post, October 15, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097812800
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097812800
>
>16. KNOCKING ROCK THE VOTE
>http://www.blog.rockthevote.com/2004_10_10_archive.html#109779237957217297
> After the Los Angeles Times reported on the youth voter
> registration organization Rock the Vote's asking whether the draft
> could be reinstituted "if the situation doesn't improve,"
> Republican National Committee chair Ed Gillespie called the
> campaign "reckless" and "malicious." In a letter to the group,
> Gillespie wrote, "It is unfortunate that you feel the need to
> engage in a misinformation campaign regarding an alleged draft to
> energize young voters." Rock the Vote's president wrote to
> Gillespie, "We think young people deserve to know where the
> politicians stand on this issue - and that a generation that could
> be called to service deserves more than the phony debate they are
> getting."
>SOURCE: Rock the Vote, October 14, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097726402
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097726402
>
>17. PFIZER DOESN'T SEND HIM FLOWERS, ANYMORE
>http://counterpunch.org/pringle10142004.html
> "A lot of people cannot afford life-saving drugs. Drug
> re-importation provides an alternative supply at lower prices for
> people who cannot afford the full price," said Dr. Peter Rost,
> Pfizer's vice president of marketing for endocrine care and the
> first drug industry executive to publicly support reimporting drugs
> from Canada to America. Although Rost's support of reimportation
> was done on his own time, Pfizer recently launched an investigation
> into his political activities. "The questioning was intense," Rost
> remarked - and biased, he claims. "If I had spoken out against
> reimportation they would have sent me flowers."
>SOURCE: CounterPunch, October 14, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097726401
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097726401
>
>18. KETCHUM TOUTS THE SPIRIT OF DAVOS
>http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/1014ketchum.htm
> Wanting to "highlight its efforts beyond the group's well-known
> annual summit of world and business leaders in Davos, Switzerland,"
> the World Economic Forum has hired the Ketchum PR firm's
> London-based corporate communications unit. The WEF wants to
> promote its "public-private efforts through its Global Institute
> for Partnership and Governance," which addresses "'some of the
> world's most challenging problems,' in areas like HIV/AIDS and
> corporate citizenship" and builds on the "'spirit of Davos' by
> organizing sustained processes of informal dialogue by leaders and
> experts on selected issues."
>SOURCE: O'Dwyer's PR Daily (reg. req'd.), October 14, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097726400
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097726400
>
>19. VIDEO NEWS RELEASES: THEY'RE EVERYWHERE!
>http://www.campaigndesk.org/archives/001015.asp
> Thomas Lang and Zachary Roth have done some further sleuthing into
> the Education Department's video news release (VNR) that featured
> fake "reporter" Karen Ryan and promoted the No Child Left Behind
> law. "It turns out that the No Child Left Behind VNR, presented as
> news, ran more widely than we had thought - it's just that it
> didn't always include Karen Ryan," they write. "A number of local
> stations ran the VNR as is, and added a local twist by simply
> having their own reporter read the script. And in an indication of
> just how confident the Department of Education was that news
> outlets would fail to adequately scrutinize the content of the VNR,
> we've also found that it included sound bites in support of the
> tutoring program from two figures whose appearance in the video
> might have raised eyebrows had anyone thought to check. ... The
> stations that took the time to have their own reporters record the
> script of the No Child Left Behind VNR had to have been fully aware
> of what they were doing: knowingly deceiving their viewers about
> the origins of the story - not to mention committing plagiarism -
> by passing off as their own original reporting words actually
> written by a PR company hired by the Bush administration."
>SOURCE: Campaign Desk, October 13, 2004
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097640000
>
>20. BUSH APPOINTEES UNDERSTAND INDUSTRY
>http://www.nynewsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usenvr1012,0,3704830.story?coll=nyc-nationhome-headlines
> "Every administration has the revolving door," said former
> Environmental Protection Agency attorney Bruce Buckheit. "The
> difference is the attitude that a lot of the Bush people brought
> with them. ... It was always about what industry wanted." Newsday
> reports, "Bush's appointees to senior environment-related jobs
> actually have less diverse backgrounds than the people Clinton
> picked. ... Bush's choices were more likely to be lobbyists or
> executives in their previous job, while Clinton's were distributed
> more evenly among the worlds of business, academia and advocacy."
> An EPA press secretary said, "You need to understand the industries
> you're regulating."
>SOURCE: Newsday, October 12, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097553601
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097553601
>
>21. REACH OUT AND DISENFRANCHISE SOMEONE
>http://www.klas-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=2421595&nav=168XRvNe
> "Employees of a private voter registration company allege that
> hundreds, perhaps thousands of voters who may think they are
> registered will be rudely surprised on election day," reports
> George Knapp. "The company claims hundreds of registration forms
> were thrown in the trash. Anyone who has recently registered or
> re-registered to vote outside a mall or grocery store or even
> government building may be affected." Eric Russell, a former
> employee of a Republican-affiliated company, called "Voters
> Outreach of America," says he personally witnessed company
> supervisors rip up and trash registration forms signed by
> Democrats. In a separate incident, Nevada election officials have
> rebuffed an attempt by a former GOP operative to purge about 17,000
> Democrats from the voter rolls. (We reported on similar past
> examples of "voter suppression" in a chapter of our recent book,
> Banana Republicans.)
>SOURCE: KLAS-TV (Las Vegas), October 12, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/October_2004.html#1097553600
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097553600
>
>22. FAKE BLOGS, TRUE BUZZ
>http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0410090289oct09,1,6293458.story
> To market a new video game, Sega built a PR campaign around a hoax.
> It created a weblog whose host called himself "Beta-7" and claimed
> that the game caused him to suffer blackouts and uncontrollable
> fits of violence. In reality, "Beta-7" was a fictional character,
> invented by the Portland, Oregon advertising agency Wieden and
> Kennedy.
>SOURCE: (registration required) Chicago Tribune, October 9, 2004
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1097294400
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at the
>Center for Media and Democracy. To subscribe or unsubcribe, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found at the
>Spin of the Day" section of the Center website:
>http://www.prwatch.org/spin/index.html
>
>Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at:
>http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues
>
>PR Watch, Spin of the Day and the Weekly Spin are projects
>of the Center for Media & Democracy, a nonprofit organization
>that offers investigative reporting on the public relations
>industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and
>misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of
>secretive, little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that
>work to control political debates and public opinion.
>Please send any questions or suggestions about our
>publications to:
>(editor /at/ prwatch.org)
>
>Contributions to the Center for Media and Democracy
>are tax-deductible. Send checks to:
> CMD
> 520 University Ave. #227
> Madison, WI 53703
>
>To donate now online, visit:
>https://www.egrants.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2344-0|1118-0
>_______________________________________________
>Weekly-Spin mailing list
>(Weekly-Spin /at/ prwatch.org)
>http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/weekly-spin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carpentier Nico (Phd)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Katholieke Universiteit Brussel - Catholic University of Brussels
Vrijheidslaan 17 - B-1081 Brussel - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-412.42.78
F: ++ 32 (0)2/412.42.00
Office: 4/0/18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Free University of Brussels
Centre for Media Sociology (CeMeSO)
Pleinlaan 2 - B-1050 Brussels - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-629.18.30
F: ++ 32 (0)2-629.28.61
Office: 5B.454
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
European Consortium for Communication Research
Web: http://www.eccr.info
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mail: (Nico.Carpentier /at/ kubrussel.ac.be)
Web: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
ECCR-Mailing list
---
To unsubscribe, send an email message to (majordomo /at/ listserv.vub.ac.be)
with in the body of the message (NOT in the subject): unsubscribe eccr
---
ECCR - European Consortium for Communications Research
Secretariat: P.O. Box 106, B-1210 Brussels 21, Belgium
Tel.: +32-2-412 42 78/47
Fax.: +32-2-412 42 00
Email: (freenet002 /at/ pi.be) or (Rico.Lie /at/ pi.be)
URL: http://www.eccr.info
----------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
