[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[Commlist] CfP "Comparison as Method and Heuristic in Communication Reserach" - Global Media Journal - German Edition
Mon Sep 14 07:48:18 GMT 2026
*GLOBAL MEDIA JOURNAL - GERMAN EDITION*
**Call for Papers: Special Issue “Comparison as Method and Heuristic in
Communication Research” – Winter 2027**
Guest Editors:
Maren Beaufort, Austrian Academy of Sciences & University of Klagenfurt
Tobias Eberwein, Austrian Academy of Sciences & University of Klagenfurt
Andreas M. Scheu, Austrian Academy of Sciences & University of Klagenfurt
Eva Tamara Asboth, Austrian Academy of Sciences & University of Klagenfurt
Matthias Karmasin, Austrian Academy of Sciences & University of Klagenfurt
Krisztina Rozgonyi, Austrian Academy of Sciences & University of Klagenfurt
Andreas Schulz-Tomančok, Austrian Academy of Sciences & University of
Klagenfurt
Comparison is fundamental to how communication research generates
knowledge. It can operate at different levels of analysis, relate
communication phenomena across a broad range of contexts, and examine
continuity and change over time. Yet its significance extends beyond
research design. As a heuristic, comparison provides a means of
questioning established assumptions, revealing patterns and contextual
contingencies, and generating new insights.
Since the 1990s, comparative research has become increasingly prominent
in communication studies (Livingstone, 2003; Pfetsch & Esser, 2004;
Melischek, Seethaler & Wilke, 2008) and has developed into a
consolidated and differentiated field of research (Esser & Hanitzsch,
2012; Esser, 2016; Chan & Lee, 2017; Holtz-Bacha, 2021; Melischek &
Seethaler, 2017; Volk, 2021). At the same time, this consolidation has
coincided with substantial changes in the conditions under which
comparative research is conceived and conducted. The phenomena and
contexts under study are becoming increasingly complex, dynamic, and
interconnected, while new forms of data and analytical approaches are
expanding the scale and scope of comparative inquiry. These developments
create new opportunities for comparison but also accentuate longstanding
methodological and epistemological challenges concerning the
construction of cases, the establishment of comparability, the
consideration of context, and the interpretation and generalization of
comparative findings. They also raise questions about inequalities in
resources and research capacities within international comparative
collaborations.
*This Special Issue invites scholars to reconsider comparison as both
method and heuristic in communication research.*It seeks to critically
assess the possibilities, challenges, and implications of comparison for
contemporary communication research, with particular attention to the
methodological and epistemological questions that comparative inquiry
raises. It also examines how changing research practices and approaches
are reshaping comparative research and how comparative findings can
contribute to methodological and theoretical development as well as to
insights of societal relevance.
We welcome conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and empirical
contributions from the full breadth of comparative media and
communication research. Submissions should engage explicitly with the
rationale, conceptualization, and consequences of comparison,
approaching comparison as a method, methodological principle, or
heuristic rather than merely as a feature of the research design.
*Key Areas*
/Innovations and Emerging Approaches in Comparative Communication Research/
The first key area of the Special Issue focuses on methodological
innovation and new approaches to designing and conducting comparative
research. We invite contributions that discuss emerging tools and forms
of data, develop innovative comparative designs, or reconsider
established methods in light of technological, societal, and
communicative transformations.
/Conditions and Limits of Comparison: Methodological, Epistemological,
and Critical Perspectives/
Comparison can increase sensitivity to context, challenge assumptions
derived from individual cases, support theory development, and help
identify relationships between social structures and communication
processes. Yet comparisons are never neutral. They depend on decisions
about concepts, cases, categories, units of analysis, standards of
equivalence, and relevant differences. The second thematic area
therefore invites critical reflection on the epistemological
assumptions, methodological limitations, and power relations embedded in
comparative research.
/From Comparison to Knowledge: Explanation, Theory, and Transfer/
Comparative research goes beyond identifying similarities and
differences. Its scientific contribution depends on how comparative
findings are interpreted, explained, and connected to broader conceptual
and theoretical questions. Comparative findings may also generate
unexpected insights, challenge established explanations, and point to
the scope and limitations of existing concepts and theories. The third
thematic area therefore considers how comparative research can advance
explanation and theory development, contribute to methodological
development, and generate insights of relevance within and beyond academia.
*Formats for Contributions*
The Special Issue welcomes different types of manuscripts, including
original empirical research articles, conceptual and theoretical
contributions, methodological articles, literature reviews, and research
notes presenting innovative comparative designs, infrastructures,
datasets, or tools.
All submissions should make an explicit contribution to the discussion
of comparison as a method, methodological principle, or heuristic.
Manuscripts that merely report results from several countries or cases
without reflecting on the logic, construction, or implications of the
comparison are unlikely to fit the scope of the Special Issue.
All contributions to the Special Issue are subject to quality assurance.
Contributions may be submitted in one of the following formats:
·Peer-reviewed Article: Theoretical, methodological, or research
articles; max. 60,000 characters, including spaces and references;
subject to double-blind peer review.
·Media Practice and Research Reports: Shorter research notes; max.
30,000 characters, including spaces and references; subject to
double-blind peer review.
·Essay: Reflections on current issues stimulating scholarly discussion;
max. 30,000 characters, including spaces and references. Before
submitting an essay, authors are asked to send a brief pitch to the
guest editors ((cmc /at/ oeaw.ac.at)) for pre-approval. Essay submissions will
be reviewed by the guest editors.
*Manuscript Submission*
Full manuscripts must comply with the submission guidelines and the
style guide of Global Media Journal – German Edition and be submitted
via the journal’s website by 31 January 2027. You will find all the
necessary information here:
https://globalmediajournal.de/index.php/gmj/en/submission
<https://globalmediajournal.de/index.php/gmj/en/submission>
When submitting, authors should select the submission category “Special
Issue: Comparison as Method and Heuristic in Communication Research.”
The Special Issue is scheduled for publication in December 2027.
*Indicative Timeline*
·Full manuscript submission deadline: 31.1.2027
·First-round review decisions: 31.5.2027
·Revised manuscripts due: 30.6.2027
·Final decisions: 30.9.2027
·Publication: December 2027
Further information: https://www.globalmediajournal.de and
https://www.oeaw.ac.at/cmc
If you have any questions about content-related aspects, please contact
the guest editors ((cmc /at/ oeaw.ac.at)); for editorial queries, please
contact the GMJ-DE editor Katharina Nötzold ((gmj /at/ polsoz.fu-berlin.de)).
*References*
·Chan, J. M., & Lee, F. L. F. (Eds.). (2017). Advancing comparative
media and communication research. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179285
·Esser, F. (2016). Komparative Kommunikationswissenschaft: Ein Feld
formiert sich [Comparative communication science: A field takes shape].
Studies in Communication Sciences, 16(1), 54-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2016.03.005
·Esser, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (Eds.). (2012). The Handbook of Comparative
Communication Research. Routledge.
·Holtz-Bacha, C. (2021). Comparative media research. European Journal of
Communication, 36(5), 446-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211043179
·Livingstone, S. (2003). On the challenges of cross-national comparative
media research. European Journal of Communication, 18(4), 477-500.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323103184003
·Melischek, G., Seethaler, J., & Wilke, J. (Eds.). (2008). Medien &
Kommunikationsforschung im Vergleich: Grundlagen, Gegenstandsbereiche,
Verfahrensweisen [Media and communication research in comparison:
Foundations, areas of study, methods]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
·Melischek, G., & Seethaler, J. (2017). Die Institutionalisierung der
Kommunikationswissenschaft an der Österreichischen Akademie der
Wissenschaften: Geschichte und Aufgabenbereiche des Instituts für
vergleichende Medien- und Kommunikationsforschung [The
institutionalization of communication science at the Austrian Academy of
Sciences: History and areas of responsibility of the Institute for
Comparative Media and Communication Studies]. Geistes-, sozial- und
kulturwissenschaftlicher Anzeiger, 152(1), 65-98.
https://doi.org/10.1553/anzeiger152-1s65
·Pfetsch, B., & Esser, F. (Eds.). (2004). Comparing political
communication: Theories, cases, and challenges. Cambridge University Press.
·Volk, S. C. (2021). Comparative communication research: A study of the
conceptual, methodological, and social challenges of international
collaborative studies in communication science. Springer VS.
**Aims and Scope**
The GLOBAL MEDIA JOURNAL – GERMAN EDITION (ISSN 2196-4807) is a diamond
open access, peer-reviewed journal for the publication of scholarly
contributions dealing with issues of international, transnational,
intercultural and transcultural communication and media, published in
English and German twice a year. No article processing charges (APCs)
are incurred. The journal is indexed in DOAJ, ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, EuroPub,
BASE and Ulrich’s.
Submissions are accepted on a rolling basis. This means that your
articles can be submitted any time for our various sections
(peer-review, essays, media practice & research reports, graduate
section, book reviews). We are also open to discuss guest-edited issues.
We would be pleased if you could circulate this announcement widely in
your academic network. Please do not hesitate to contact us for
feedback. You can get in touch with the managing editor Katharina
Nötzold via gmj(at)polsoz.fu-berlin.de
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely. The commlist has no responsibility for any damage caused by its postings. Subscription to the list automatically implies agreement with this rule.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ commlist.org)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]