[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[Commlist] Cfp: Reflection on research experiences among “unmarked” groups
Mon Oct 28 09:39:22 GMT 2019
8TH ETHNOGRAPHY AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CONFERENCE
University of Bergamo, Italy
June 3-6, 2020
Organized by:
The University of Bergamo
The journal Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa (ERQ)
Reflection on research experiences among “unmarked” groups
Ethnographies of inverted fieldworks
Convenors:
Yolinliztli Pérez Hernández (École des Hautes Études en Sciences
Sociales; Institut National d’Études Démographiques)
(yolinliztli.perez /at/ ehess.fr) <mailto:(yolinliztli.perez /at/ ehess.fr)>
&
Paulina Sabugal Paz (University of Pisa; University of Roma Tre)
(pau.sabugal /at/ gmail.com) <mailto:(pau.sabugal /at/ gmail.com)>
Ethnography has been historically linked with the colonial relationship
between Europe and their ex-colonies and with other asymmetries. For
social anthropology, for example, fieldwork has consisted for a long
time in the study of “exotic cultures” in non-European societies, and
for sociology in the research of “marginal groups” in modern societies.
Fieldwork research has an a priori: the researcher or participant
observer belongs to a “we” group (civilized and Westerns) and the
informant or participant observed, belongs to a “they” group (primitive
and non-Western). This tendency is today mainly maintained. Researches
about “unmarked” groups (white, wealthy and heterosexual people, for
example) are scarce. Although the “unmarked” comprises the vast majority
of social life, the “marked” commands a disproportionate share of
attention from social scientists currently doing ethnography studies.
Regretfully, researches subverting these historical hierarchical
relationships are still rare. Several methodological obstacles (How to
get access to people in order to study them? Who gives access and on
what terms? Who can and who does study whom? And, under what conditions
and for which objectives who studies who?) and epistemological
consequences (since the marked already draws more attention within the
global culture, social scientists contribute to re-mark marked groups,
and to reproduce common-sense images of the social reality) are
associated with this marginality.
Furthermore, not only those kind of studies are little common, but also
personal reflections on research experiences. This panel aims at
fulfilling this theoretical vacuum by gathering researchers working on
“inverted” fieldworks. It invites social scientists conducting
ethnographic fieldwork about “unmarked” groups to send a proposal.
Theoretical and methodological reflections are welcomed as well as
reflections on how asymmetrical relationships play in fieldwork
relationships (reflexivity).
Proposals are welcome from different research fields such as
anthropology, sociology, history, Latin-American studies, political
studies, communication (visual anthropology, visual ethnographies,
documentary, etc)
Papers are invited on topics related, but not limited, to:
- Methodological, theoretical, and practical (access to fieldwork)
challenges that researchers face when they study “unmarked” groups;
- How fieldwork experiences contribute to thinking epistemological
conditions of the production of knowledge;
- Significant elements for the researcher’s identity to defined
respectability: mainstream social values, race, gender, social interests;
- How a phenomenon becomes an ethnographically studiedly and
legitimately subject of research;
- Under what historical, social and cultural conditions a social segment
deserve ethnographic research;
- How methods can be used not only to debunk hierarchical research
relationships but also to produce new scientific insights with greater
validity.
Submission deadline: January 10, 2019 – see here how to submit
HOW TO SUBMIT
To submit your proposal please send an e-mail to the convenor/s of the
session and to the conference committee ((erq.conference /at/ unibg.it)
<mailto:(erq.conference /at/ unibg.it)>), mentioning the title of the chosen
session in the email subject. Please send:
• the title of your talk and an abstract of maximum 1000 words (.doc,
.docx, .odt, .txt, .rtf);
• your contact details (full name, e-mail, post address and affiliation)
and those of your co-author/s, if any;
• if you like (we would like!), a short video talk (2 min. max.), not
necessarily a piece of what your proposed talk would be, but a sort of
teaser trailer for it, and a piece of you too (by sending the video, you
thereby allow the organizing committee to upload the video at its
discretion, in full or cut form, on the youtube channel of Etnografia e
Ricerca Qualitativa:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTAnycGjE5KzDCr-AnFJwow/feed).
Abstracts (and video talks) must be submitted in English. The official
languages of the conference, however, are Italian, English, and French;
for each session, languages will be used depending on the participants
composition.
Proposal must be submitted by January 10, 2020.
Acceptance of proposals will be notified by March 9, 2020.
Contributors must register by April 13, 2020 to be included in the program.
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]