[Previous message][Back to index]
[ecrea] CFP - The Ends of Television Conference, Amsterdam
Wed Oct 29 09:57:20 GMT 2008
Call for Papers:
The Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis 
(ASCA) and the Department of Media Studies of 
the Universiteit van Amsterdam invite papers for a 3-day conference on
The Ends of Television
Logics/Perspectives/Entanglements
Monday June 29 ? Wednesday July 1 2009 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Keynote speakers:
Joke Hermes (InHolland, Universiteit van Amsterdam)
Toby Miller (University of California Riverside)
Anna McCarthy (NYU)
Conference theme:
Is TV as we know it dead? Does TV Studies have 
any relevance in a world of media convergence? 
Are we at risk of becoming gravediggers of an 
obsolete medium rather than innovators in a 
cross-medial regime? The conference will address 
some of the central frames through which TV has 
been analyzed to test their relevance in an age 
where digitalization and convergence is 
redrawing the boundaries of media and of 
disciplines. Rather than accept the narrative of 
obsolescence or the nostalgia of seclusion, the 
conference aims at seriously analyzing both the 
contemporary specificity of TV and the 
challenges thrown up by new developments in 
technology and theory. For example: What is the 
specificity of the TV image in an environment 
suffused with moving images? Has the spectator 
of TV changed in a media world that begs 
?interaction?? How does the relevance of 
ideology-critique and propaganda fare in the age 
of surveillance? Is the educational role of TV 
obsolete with the triumph of market logics?
Depending on how these and other questions are 
answered, TV Studies must rethink its own status 
as a discipline, beginning with its own position 
vis-à-vis Film Studies and New Media Studies. Do 
such separations still hold analytical purchase? 
What old concepts need reformulation, and what 
areas of study (e.g. cultural studies, 
philosophy, sociology, anthropology, political 
science, art history) can we both borrow from and enrich?
Contributions are invited which take a stand on 
the relevance of TV, and TV Studies, through 
substantial and close analyses of specific dimensions of television:
(Medium) Specificity
If we are witnessing the end of TV as we know 
it, what is it being replaced with? What form 
will TV take in the future, and what are its 
aesthetic qualities? What is the ontology of the 
televisual image and sound once it has been 
digitized?  How does the aural experience of 
contemporary television sets enhance or affect 
television watching? If ?flow? and ?liveness? 
was what distinguished TV from film in the 20th 
century, how does this hold true in the 21st? 
What effects does the change from flow and 
liveness to the archive have for our 
understanding of the medium? How do TV, film and 
new media relate to each other in the new constellation?
(Functional) Logics
How does TV function? Questions of broad and 
narrow-casting, the blurring of genres and media 
(cross media), the fluidity of audiences, the 
multiple settings of TV reception, etc ? all 
these dimensions point to an acceleration of 
change in the logics of TV?s mode of 
functioning. What broad changes can be 
identified in the logics of TV, and how do they 
relate to larger shifts in contemporary 
societies, technologies, and communication 
patterns? More specifically, what is the impact 
of these changes when we consider the purposeful 
use of TV? What will become of advertising when 
television goes digital? What is the 
relationship between branding and television?s 
functional logics? What becomes of propaganda in 
a multi-channel environment? In what sense has 
TV?s governmental logic changed during the last 
decade? How does media literacy function in knowledge societies?
(Conceptual) Changes
If the logics of TV are shifting, how might they 
be studied in the contemporary context? What 
new, or different perspectives can be brought to 
bear in intellectually engaging with the medium? 
Do the established (analytical) distinctions of 
production, reception, textual analysis, 
suffice? Do more dimensions need to be added, or 
do the existing distinctions need to be 
broadened, sharpened or reviewed, keeping in 
mind the changing logics of television? ? e.g. 
in the context of convergence, and multimedia 
interaction, such as UGC, how do terms like 
?production? and ?reception? change their meaning?
(Transdisciplinary) Entanglements
Given that the logics of television?s mode of 
functioning, and the perspectives of TV Studies 
need analysis and change, in what way do these 
changes suggest an entangled and 
cross-fertilized re-definition of the field 
itself, its ends (goals), and its future 
development? On the one hand, how might a 
reviewing of television and its modes of 
analysis enrich other disciplines (for example 
Visual Culture, a re-defined Art History, Film 
History, Media Archaeology)? On the other, what 
might TV Studies gain from strategically 
borrowing and re-working theories and concepts 
from other fields (Sociology, Political 
Philosophy, Philosophy of Law, Cultural 
Analysis)? What contributions can more recent 
paradigms like cognitivism or network theory 
make? Can TV studies borrow terms from chaos 
theory like emergence, non-linearity, or 
attractors, and what do they contribute to the 
already existing theoretical vocabulary?
Proposal deadline: proposals for papers and/or 
panels should be sent to 
<mailto:(asca-fgw /at/ uva.nl)>(asca-fgw /at/ uva.nl) before February 26 2009.
Organising committee: Sudeep Dasgupta, Marijke 
de Valck, Jaap Kooijman, Jan Teurlings
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nico Carpentier (Phd)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Free University of Brussels
Centre for Studies on Media and Culture (CeMeSO)
Pleinlaan 2 - B-1050 Brussels - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-629.18.56
F: ++ 32 (0)2-629.36.84
Office: 5B.401a
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored links ;)
----------------------------
New books:
Discourse Theory and Cultural Analysis. Media, Arts and Literature.
Nico Carpentier & Erik Spinoy (Eds.) @ Hampton Press
http://www.hamptonpress.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=1-57273-810-3&Category_Code=Q208
&
Democracy, Journalism and Technology
Nico Carpentier, et al. (Eds.) @ UTPress
http://www.researchingcommunication.eu/
----------------------------
European Communication Research and Education Association
Web: http://www.ecrea.eu
----------------------------
ECREA's Second European Communication Conference
Barcelona, 25-28 November 2008
http://www.ecrea2008barcelona.org/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mail: (Nico.Carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
Web: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
----------------
ECREA-Mailing list
----------------
This mailing list is a free service from ECREA.
---
To unsubscribe, please visit http://www.ecrea.eu/mailinglist
---
ECREA - European Communication Research and Education Association
Postal address:
ECREA
Université Libre de Bruxelles
c/o Dept. of Information and Communication Sciences
CP123, avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, b-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
Email: (info /at/ ecrea.eu)
URL: http://www.ecrea.eu
----------------
[Previous message][Back to index]