Archive for April 2022

[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]

[Commlist] Digital Bodies Seminar Series

Tue Apr 12 15:03:03 GMT 2022




As part of our Feminist Media & Cultural Studies Summer School, the Centre for Gender Studies at Lancaster University is hosting a series of online seminars on ‘Digital Bodies’. Free and open to all!

*Camming: Money, Power, and Pleasure in the Sex Work Industry*

*Prof Angela Jones*

*26^th April 2022, 4pm BST *Book here <https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/camming-money-power-and-pleasure-in-the-sex-work-industry-tickets-300880911907>

Through the erotic webcam industry—"camming”—millions of people from all over the globe have found decent wages, friendship, intimacy, community, empowerment, and pleasure. Cam models, like all sex workers, must grapple with exploitation, discrimination, harassment, and stigmatization. Using an intersectional lens, Jones is attentive to how the overlapping systems of neoliberal capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy, cissexism, heterosexism, and ableism shape all cam models’ experiences in this new global sex industry. In their book, Camming: Money, Power, and Pleasure in the Sex Work Industry, Jones pioneers an entirely new subfield in sociology—the sociology of pleasure.

**

**

*Algorithmic Gay Sexualities on Douyin*

*Dr Oscar Tianyang Zhou*

*3^rd May 2022, 4pm BST *Book here <https://www.eventbrite.com/e/algorithmic-gay-sexualities-on-douyin-tickets-261095943997?aff=odcleoeventsincollection&keep_tld=1>

Short videos featuring same-sex romance on Douyin, the Chinese domestic version of TikTok, have generated lively discussions in recent years. Drawing upon algorithmic ethnography, this study enrols algorithms to gather qualitative data to examine how Chinese social media platforms and their algorithms intersect with gay sexualities. It aims to answer the following questions: how do gay men experience algorithms as part of their everyday lives? How do recommendation algorithms give rise to gay visibility in the mainstream where it is hard to obtain due to China’s media censorship? What does this algorithmic visibility promise Chinese gay men? By critically looking into the ways that gay romance contents are generated on Douyin, the algorithmic gay visibility arguably becomes a profitable convenience for corporate social media platforms and operates with an exclusion mechanism.

This research project is part of the research initiative in algorithmic gay sexualities established by Dr Shuaishuai Wang (Xi’an Jiaotong - Liverpool University).

*Vulnerability and Control: queer men, smartphones & cultures of intimacy*

*Dr Jamie Hakim*

*20^th May 2022, 2pm BST *Book here <https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/vulnerability-and-control-queer-men-smartphones-cultures-of-intimacy-tickets-269589287817>

In this presentation I will discuss the major findings of the ESRC funded project, ‘Digital Intimacies: how queer men use their smartphones to negotiate their cultures of intimacy.’ These are that i) a striking number of the 43 UK-based queer men we interviewed defined intimacy primarily in terms of vulnerability and ii) they used their smartphones to gain a sense of control over the areas of their intimate lives where they felt most vulnerable.

To understand these smartphone mediated intimacies, we approached them ‘conjuncturally’ (Hall et, al. 1978), situating them as fully as possible in the historical contexts in which they were practiced. In so doing, I argue their emergence makes sense when we think of how vulnerable so many of us feel during an historical conjuncture consumed by ‘poly-crisis’ (Tooze, 2021) and in which the desire for ‘control’ has become a defining feature. We need only think of the political slogans: ‘Take Back Control’ and ‘Control the Virus’.

In this talk I will give an overview of the specific ways that these conjunctural dynamics have been brought to bear on queer men’s smartphone mediated intimacies: primarily in how neoliberalism’s waning hegemony has resulted in a series of political struggles over questions of sex, race and gender (the ‘culture wars’); the privatisation of queer counter-public space; and what intimacies were practicable during the coronavirus pandemic. In this fraught context, where different forms of queer life have become more vulnerable, it seems that the affordances of our participant’s smartphones gave them the feeling they could exercise control over one of the few domains where this still felt possible – their intimate lives.

I conclude by considering the politics and ethics of this desire for control and arguing that both conjunctural analysis and research on digital intimacies are mutually enriched when put in conversation with each other.


---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------



[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]