[ecrea] CfA: Open Access Book and Workshop in Rotterdam on Vigilant Audiences

We wish to remind you about the following book project and workshop, 
which includes modest travel funds for contributors. Abstracts are due 
at the end of next week (April 27th)


Call for abstracts: Vigilant Audiences: Understanding Scrutiny, 
Denunciations, and Shaming in Digital Media Use.


https://www.eur.nl/en/eshcc/news/call-abstracts-vigilant-audiences ;(includes 
link to call PDF) **Please circulate widely**


We are seeking contributors for an open-access edited volume as well as 
a two-day workshop in October, on the topic of digital vigilante 
audiences. This proposed edited collection concerns media users in terms 
of their vigilant engagements with others. By looking at practices in 
which digital media users respond to individuals breaching legal and 
moral boundaries, we can better understand their motivations, but also 
the broader conceptual and societal implications of these practices.


Today’s media landscape allows for scrutiny and intervention in the 
lives of others. Conventional outlets such as the press and reality 
television are supplemented and even supplanted by digital media users, 
who can report and comment on events through any number of mobile 
applications and other web-based platforms. They may denounce 
high-profile crimes, such as terrorism, sexual abuse, pedophilia, or 
participation in riots. They may also target comparatively benign 
transgressions such as petty theft, bad parking, or disorderly conduct 
(whether in embodied public spaces or online). In some cases, 
unaffiliated citizens may play a primary role in breaking a story, for 
example, by publishing footage of a criminal event to a public forum. In 
other cases they may respond to a story that broke through a public 
broadcaster, but shape the visibility and public perception of that 
story through vitriolic commentary, crowdsourced information about the 
perpetrator, among other practices. Contemporary media systems may be 
considered as hybrids (Chadwick 2013) in the sense that journalists and 
other media actors mobilise and in some cases even depend on their 
audiences, who play an active role in ‘making’ a story. While media 
scholars talk about news-making assemblages (ibid.), and criminologists 
talk about surveillant assemblages in the context of police scrutiny 
(Haggerty and Ericson 2000), we may consider the extent to which any 
single instance of user-involved vigilantism involves data flows that 
implicate both criminological and journalistic spheres.


Vigilantism and shaming as social practices have long histories that 
predate digital media. Yet the adoption of services like Twitter, along 
with the popularity of populist social news platforms and the ubiquity 
of comment sections on news sites means that these practices are 
accessible to any user, and may have a lasting impact on the lives of 
those who have been targeted. Vigilant media use not only impacts the 
lives of those who have been denounced, but also may serve to discipline 
and otherwise govern over those who share categorical affiliations (on 
the basis of gender, ethnicity, sexual identity, political views, 
economic status, among others) and may fear negative repercussions. In 
other words, mediated vigilance and shaming may contribute to one’s own 
self-scrutiny, and may shape everyday practices and politics of 
visibility. Research on vigilante movements is typically concerned with 
the complexities and contradictions in relations between states and 
citizens: one the one hand, citizens seem to operate in excess of the 
state, yet they also share similar objectives (ex: ‘safe streets’) and 
hegemonic cultural values. This remains the case with digital media and 
digital vigilantism, and in addition the relations between media outlets 
and media users warrant conceptual and empirical attention.


Contributions to this edited collection will address contemporary 
digital media practices involving users both consuming and participating 
in the denunciation of other individuals. We welcome scholarship engaged 
with a range of (cross-)disciplinary perspectives, including but not 
limited to sociology, criminology, cultural and media studies. 
Contributions are not limited to any national or regional context, and 
we are especially interested in cases and contexts that have not 
received prior scholarly attention. In particular, we seek chapters that 
make theoretical and empirical contributions in response to the 
following questions:

- What role do audiences play in denunciatory media (ex: tabloid press; 
crime-based reality television; populist websites)?

- How do the press portray user-led shaming practices? How might these 
representations vary according to social and political context?

- In what ways do established and emerging mediated vigilante practices 
shape each other (ex: the relation between Twitter use and journalism, 
or between covering a shaming campaign and contributing to it)?

- How might either traditional or entrepreneurial forms of populism 
(Fieschi and Heywood 2004) contribute to contemporary denunciatory 
practices?

- What role might less visible media practices such as ‘listening’ or 
‘lurking’ play in mediated shaming, notably in terms of scrutiny or in 
terms of composing imagined audiences?

- What role do digital media (including mobile apps, social platforms 
and other web-based services) play in scrutiny and denunciation?

- How might scrutiny and denunciatory practices either reinforce or 
contest categorical forms of discrimination and violence?

- How might the public (whether in their role as audiences, educators, 
parents, guardians, etc.) modify their media use in response to (the 
possibility of) public scrutiny, denunciation and harassment?

- What kinds of subject positions are typically invoked in the mediated 
representations of outrage (ex: the ‘failson’, diaosi, etc..)


Contributing authors are also invited to participate in a two-day 
workshop on this topic in October, to be held in Rotterdam, NL. This 
will be an opportunity for authors to present their works in progress 
and receive constructive feedback. Modest funds will be able to partly 
support travel and accommodation for contributors.


Final versions of chapters should be no longer than 7500 words, 
including references and notes. We intend to submit a full proposal to 
Open Book Publishers (https://www.openbookpublishers.com/), a nonprofit 
open-access publisher that has expressed an interest in this collection.


We are currently seeking extended abstracts of approximately 800 words. 
Please send this (following the guidelines below) to Daniel Trottier 
((trottier /at/ eshcc.eur.nl) <mailto:(trottier /at/ eshcc.eur.nl)>) no later than 
Friday, April 27th, 2018.


Tentative schedule

Extended abstracts due: 27th April 2018

Notification of accepted contributions: 15th May 2018

Workshop in Rotterdam: early October 2018 (exact dates TBA)

First draft of chapters due: 15th December 2018

Feedback on chapters returned: 15th February 2019

Final versions of chapters due: 1st May 2019


Extended abstract structure

In order to be considered, abstracts should adhere to the following 
structure (approx. 800 words, please address each aspect separately and 
include the specific headlines in your abstract):

- Contribution title

- Full name of the author(s)

- Institutional affiliation(s) and position(s)

- e-mail address(es)

1) Purpose: What are the overall tasks and research questions the 
chapter addresses?

2) Scope: What is the scope of the analysis? This may include a time 
period for the analysis, geographic scope, phenomena that are either 
included or excluded in the analysis, or particular social spheres and 
their interrelations.

3) Method: Which theoretical approaches and empirical research methods 
are employed for answering the research questions and attaining the 
chapter’s task?

4) Results: What are the main results presented in the paper?

5) Conclusions: What are the main conclusions of the conducted research 
for concerned scholarly fields of study?

6) Recommendations: What are the main recommendations for scholarly 
research, as well as other concerned actors such as citizens, the press, 
digital media platforms and government branches?



---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please
use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at
http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------