[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[ecrea] CfP "Bridges and Boundaries: Theories, Concepts and Sources in Communication History"
Sun Jan 04 18:35:45 GMT 2015
CfP: Bridges and Boundaries: Theories, Concepts and Sources in
Communication History
An International Conference in Venice, Italy – September 16-18, 2015
Organizer: Communication History Section of the European Communication
Research and Education Association (ECREA)
Co-Sponsor: Centre for Early Modern Mapping, News and Networks
(CEMMN.net) – Queen Mary University of London
Fernand Braudel in his seminal essay History and the Social Sciences:
The Longue Durée pointed out that many academic disciplines/fields which
study different aspects of social life inevitably encroach upon their
neighbors, yet often remain in “blissful ignorance” of each other.
Braudel, and others have repeatedly called for historians and social
scientists to overcome their deep ontological and epistemological
differences in order to work together.
Despite much progress in this regard, communication history remains one
of the fields where profitable interdisciplinary dialogue can still take
place. Being aware of this need, the Communication History Section of
ECREA invites researchers who focus on various aspects of the history of
communication, media, networks and technologies (broadly defined), to
come together with two main aims:
1) to explore the bridges and boundaries between disciplines/fields;
2) to exchange ideas about how communication history is being done and
how it might be done, while emphasizing theories, concepts and sources
beneficial to their research, as well as emerging trends and themes.
A three-day conference will take place in Venice, one of the great hubs
of early modern communication, at Warwick University’s seat in Palazzo
Pesaro Papafava. The opening keynote address will be delivered by
Professor Mario Infelise, a leading scholar of early modern print and
journalism and the head of the graduate program in the Humanities at the
University of Venice Ca’ Foscari. Instead of traditional panels and
papers, the conference aims to foster dialogue among scholars of various
disciplines through topically organized round-tables, master classes,
and countless opportunities for informal discussions.
The organizing committee invites scholars to submit abstracts of max.
400 words in which they address one of the main themes listed below and
outline a short intervention that they might contribute to a round table
on that theme. Such interventions should focus mainly on theoretical or
methodological approaches, issues and experiences that the speaker has
engaged with in his/her research. Historical case studies can be
presented only so far as they contain a high degree of
historiographical/theoretical significance. Interdisciplinary roundtable
sessions will be organized in which participating scholars will also
discuss questions raised by a chair and the audience, based on these
proposals.
The deadline for abstract submission is
January 10, 2015.
The conference registration fee will be 140 euro and participants will
be asked to cover their own travel expenses. Abstracts should be saved
as pdf documents and submitted through the conference website:
https://ecreahistoryvenice2015.wordpress.com.
MAIN THEMES
(1) Theories and Models:
Grand theories or meta-narratives often have at their core information
networks and communication technologies. To what extent are theoretical
premises advocated by scholars such as Braudel, Innis, McLuhan,
Habermas, Luhmann, Benedict Anderson, Lefevbre – and more recently by
Hallin and Mancini, Castells, Gitelman, Simonson, Mosco, Hendy,
Hesmondalgh, Kittler, Fickers – applicable in historical inquiry? How
has your own research in communication history been inspired by such
concepts and theories?
(2) Space and Place:
Communication networks and information technologies are always embedded
in a material setting that can foster or hinder certain communication
practices, call into being new forms of exchange, and drive
technological development. What is the place of the geographical
imagination in current communication history research? How valuable are
the ideas of ‘place’ and ‘space’ in historical research? What are the
current trends within the field of historical geography that can advance
our understanding of communication history?
(3) News and Networks:
How valuable is the idea of ‘the network’? What were the technologies
that historically mediated the spread of information through networks?
Who participated in networks used in advancing what Bourdieu later
called cultural capital? To what extend did such networks contribute to
the rise of public opinion and the public sphere? Can we talk about
historical continuities between the early modern republic of letters and
what Castells later popularized as the network society?
(4) Alternative Media:
In order to understand communication history as a long-term, inclusive
process, which alternative media or communication technologies (besides
the familiar ‘mass media’ of the 20th century) need to be considered,
and how? Possibilities might include migration flows, civic and
religious ceremonies, theatre, preaching, fashion, the visual arts or
architecture. What kinds of methodological or theoretical implications
does their consideration carry?
(5) Sources and Methods:
The progressive digitization of archives and libraries is opening access
to primary sources for increasingly wider circles of scholars. What are
the advantages and challenges raised by this development? To what extent
do issues of materiality matter particularly to the realm of media and
human communication research? What are the most relevant sources that
you use for your own research?
(6) ‘New’ Media:
At one time, even the oldest communication technologies were looked upon
as suspicious novelties. Socrates famously condemned writing; the
introduction of print may have been hailed by some as a ‘revolutionary’
enterprise – a term now often applied also to the digital age. What are
the lessons that scholars can learn from studying critical periods
during which one dominant technology is replaced by a new mode of
communication? How do such lessons serve our understanding of the
phenomenon called new media?
Organizing Committee:
Dr. Rosa Salzberg, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Dr. Gabriele Balbi, Università della Svizzera italiana, Switzerland
Dr. Juraj Kittler, St. Lawrence University, USA
Contact Information:
Juraj Kittler, Ph.D.
Performance and Communication Arts
& English Departments
St. Lawrence University
Canton, NY 13617 - USA
E-mail: (jkittler /at/ stlawu.edu)
Phone: 001-717-350-4804
Phone: 001-717-350-4804
---------------
ECREA-Mailing list
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier and ECREA.
--
To subscribe, post or unsubscribe, please visit
http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
--
ECREA - European Communication Research and Education Association
Chauss�de Waterloo 1151, 1180 Uccle, Belgium
Email: (info /at/ ecrea.eu)
URL: http://www.ecrea.eu
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]