Archive for April 2004

(From 2002 until 2005, this mailing list was called the ECCR mailing list)
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]

[eccr] The Weekly Spin, Wednesday, April 14, 2004

Wed Apr 14 06:20:48 GMT 2004


>THE WEEKLY SPIN, Wednesday, April 14, 2004
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>sponsored by PR WATCH (www.prwatch.org)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to
>further information about current public relations campaigns.
>It is emailed free each Wednesday to subscribers.
>
>SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS)
>Who do you know who might want to receive Spin of the Week?
>Help us grow our subscriber list!  Just forward this message to
>people you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link:
>
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>THIS WEEK'S NEWS
>
>1. That Liberal Media
>2. Always Look on the Bright Side of Life
>3. It's Not Easy, Being Green(washers)
>4. Releasing the Briefing
>5. One Less Cog in the Propaganda Machine
>6. U.S. Department of Apprehension
>7. Bagdad One Year Later
>8. Hearts and Minds: It's What's for Dinner
>9. Condi Testifies
>10. Check Out the Latest Rollback!
>11. Working Hard for the Money
>12. Thanks for the Opportunity
>13. Teed Off at Augusta
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>1. THAT LIBERAL MEDIA
>http://portlandphoenix.com/features/this_just_in/documents/03741836.asp
>   Alex Irvine reports: "The Portland Press Herald, after several
>   years of getting its nerve up, has fired reporter Ted Cohen, who in
>   July 2000 unearthed the story of George W. Bush's 1976 DWI arrest
>   in Kennebunkport. Cohen's editor promptly spiked the story, with
>   the result that it didn't get out into the national media until
>   just before the 2000 election. The discovery that the Press Herald
>   sat on the story embarrassed executive editor Jeannine Guttman and
>   made the paper an object of ridicule among journalists. Since then,
>   Cohen says, 'the working atmosphere has just been strained beyond
>   words.'"
>SOURCE: Portland Phoenix
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081815832
>
>2. ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE OF LIFE
>   The Bush-Cheney campaign's aptly named advertising team, Maverick
>   Media, understands that this year's presidential election is much
>   different than the previous one: "The environment in 2000 was peace
>   and prosperity. Everything was going fine and the question was what
>   to do next. This time there are challenges in the economy and we
>   have challenges because of the war on terror and Iraq and
>   everything associated," said Matthew Dowd, Maverick's media and
>   statistics guru in 2000 and the Bush-Cheney campaign's current
>   director of strategy (Karl Rove's old position). The optimistic Mr.
>   Dowd also "noted that the controversy over Sept. 11 images in Mr.
>   Bush's campaign ads resulted in $6 million in free air time for the
>   ads and 40 million people seeing the spots who otherwise would not
>   have seen them."
>SOURCE: Advertising Age, April 12, 2004
>Web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081742401
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081742401
>
>3. IT'S NOT EASY, BEING GREEN(WASHERS)
>http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/04/12/forest_service_pamphlet_criticized/
>   The Forest Service's controversial "Forests With a Future"
>   campaign, handled by PR firm OneWorld Communications, includes a
>   brochure explaining why increased logging will benefit Sierra
>   Nevada forests. "The pamphlet... explains that fire risks have
>   risen as the Sierra's forests have grown more dense in the past
>   century. Six small black-and-white photos spanning 80 years appear
>   beside descriptions of how the 'forests of the past' had fewer
>   trees and less underbrush, making them less susceptible to fire...
>   However, the 1909 photo does not depict natural conditions - it was
>   taken just after the forest had been logged. And the pictured
>   forest is nowhere near the Sierra Nevada. It is in Montana,"
>   reports Associated Press. The director of Cedar Ridge, California's
>   John Muir Project called the brochure "very misleading."
>SOURCE: Associated Press, April 12, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081742400
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081742400
>
>4. RELEASING THE BRIEFING
>http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000485027
>   When the White House released the sure-to-be-controversial Aug. 6,
>   2001, President's Daily Brief (PDB) on the terrorist threat against
>   the U.S., its timing could not have been accidental," reports Greg
>   Mitchell. "Coming shortly after 6 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on
>   Saturday, it not only emerged too late for the network news
>   programs, it also gave the nation's daily newspapers just hours to
>   digest and interpret it. To help reporters in this task, the White
>   House also released a guide longer than the 17-sentence PDB. But if
>   the White House hoped that all of this would make major newspapers
>   spin the story their way, officials there must be sadly
>   disappointed today. Nearly every major outlet chose to focus on the
>   aspects of the brief that were not merely 'historical,' as the
>   administraton had portrayed the document before its release."
>SOURCE: Editor and Publisher, April 11, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081656001
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081656001
>
>5. ONE LESS COG IN THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE
>http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9249982%255E421,00.html
>   A senior defense advisor to the Australian government says she was
>   fired after refusing to write media briefings that supported claims
>   that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. "I felt like I was
>   part of the propaganda machine. As a public servant I shouldn't be
>   expected to write propaganda," said engineer and analyst Jane
>   Errey. Rather than participate in pro-war briefings, she took a
>   leave of absence and has now been terminated permanently.
>SOURCE: News.com.au, April 11, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081656000
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081656000
>
>6. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF APPREHENSION
>http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/10/national/nationalspecial2/10COW.html
>   "It is ironic in the extreme that an administration that's so
>   interested in letting industry come up with its own solutions would
>   come down with a heavy government hand on a company that's being
>   creative," said one public health expert, commenting on the U.S.
>   Department of Agriculture's decision not to allow Kansas'
>   Creekstone Farms to test every cow it processes for mad cow
>   disease. Creekstone wants 100% testing in order to resume sales to
>   Japan, South Korea and other countries banning U.S. beef; the
>   inability to export "is costing [Creekstone] $40,000 a day and
>   forced it to lay off 50 employees." Industry associations,
>   including the American Meat Institute and National Cattlemen's Beef
>   Association, applauded the USDA, saying 100% testing is "not based
>   on sound science."
>SOURCE: New York Times, April 10, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081569600
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081569600
>
>7. BAGDAD ONE YEAR LATER
>http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=509893
>   One year after the staged toppling of Saddam Hussein's statue in
>   Firdos Square, the bloody violence in Iraq is reaching new peaks.
>    "The last several days in Iraq have seen a spiraling of violence
>   and horror that has taken many Americans by surprise, mostly
>   because those Americans have been relying on the Bush
>   administration for the straight dope," Truthout's William Rivers
>   Pitts writes. We would add that U.S. media have also failed to set
>   the record straight. While they are reporting on the anniversary of
>   Hussein's statue being pulled down, they are still failing to
>   identify the event as nothing more than a glorified photo-op, which
>   we exposed in our book Weapons of Mass Deception. This past Sunday,
>   Firdos Square saw a demonstration by thousands of supporters of
>   Moqtada al-Sadr against the American occupation. Canadian
>   journalist Naomi Klein reports, "US forces pointed tanks at the
>   crowd [in Firdos Sqaure] while a loudspeaker told them that
>   'demonstrations are an important part of democracy but blocking
>   traffic will not be permitted'." The New York Times reports, the
>   square was completely shut off Friday by U.S. military. A U.S.
>   Humvee circling the neighborhood warned residents not to leave
>   their homes. "Anybody who enters the area carrying a weapon will be
>   shot on sight," the Humvee's loudspeaker blared.
>SOURCE: Independent (UK) , April 9, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081483201
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081483201
>
>8. HEARTS AND MINDS: IT'S WHAT'S FOR DINNER
>http://www.meatingplace.com/DailyNews/pop.asp?ID=12160
>   In a wide-ranging opinion piece, former American Meat Institute PR
>   man Dan Murphy asks: "Could 9-11 have been prevented? You might as
>   well ask, could the outbreak of BSE (mad cow disease) in North
>   American [sic] have been prevented?... For those who question why
>   our intelligence and law enforcement agencies didn't do everything
>   possible to forestall 9-11, I would ask: Why didn't USDA implement
>   the extraordinary measures taken since Dec. 23, 2003, to deal with
>   BSE years ago?" His answer: "Whether the discussion is over
>   terrorist attacks or the appearance of BSE, assuming that either
>   could have been prevented is assuming a lot." And his take-home
>   message: in order to "counter the radical activists," the meat
>   industry must reach out to local communities and realize that "it's
>   not only about changing laws, it's about changing hearts and
>   minds."
>SOURCE: Meatingplace.com, April 9, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081483200
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081483200
>
>9. CONDI TESTIFIES
>http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Condoleezza_Rice
>   As violence escalates in Iraq, Dr. Condoleezza Rice, the Bush
>   administration's Assistant to the President for National Security
>   Affairs, testifies today before the National Commission on
>   Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, following a recent,
>   highly public clash with Richard A. Clarke, the former White House
>   advisor who has sharply criticized the administration's handling of
>   counterterrorism. However, her testimony comes with conditions,
>   including a promise by the commission that no other White House
>   personnel will be asked to testify.
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081423246
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081423246
>
>10. CHECK OUT THE LATEST ROLLBACK!
>http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0408/p03s01-ussc.html
>   Tuesday's 2-to-1 vote against a Wal-Mart supercenter in Inglewood
>   CA "has broad implications for the expansion of Wal-Mart across the
>   country." Wal-Mart spent more than $1 million on PR for the
>   referendum, compared to the opposition's $150,000. "Money is
>   important, but it's not everything," remarked one opposition
>   member. Wal-Mart also funded a Los Angeles County Economic
>   Development Corporation study that, not surprisingly, found that
>   "supercenters could save Southern California households an average
>   of $600 a year, which would be pumped back into the community."
>   Many aren't convinced; the co-publishers of The Black Commentator
>   wrote: "If evil could be branded, its emblem would be the Wal-Mart
>   logo." So much for Wal-Mart's efforts to portray itself as a
>   "kinder, gentler behemoth."
>SOURCE: Christian Science Monitor, April 8, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081396800
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081396800
>
>11. WORKING HARD FOR THE MONEY
>http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/0407salvador.htm
>   The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) may not "ensure
>   adequate remedy for workers' rights abuses, protect women workers
>   from discrimination, or improve domestic labor law enforcement," as
>   Human Rights Watch claims, but it does have an international PR
>   campaign. Weber Shandwick is working with El Salvador's Investment
>   Promotion Board "to drum up U.S. corporate support for [El
>   Salvador] and push for Congressional support" of CAFTA. El
>   Salvador's deputy human rights ombudsman warned: "CAFTA protects
>   the fundamental rights of businesses but not the labor rights of
>   the citizens." An observer of last month's Salvadoran elections
>   notes that, although the pro-CAFTA ARENA party won the presidency,
>   "many Salvadorans with whom I spoke said that the fear" of U.S.
>   economic reprisals "was a driving force behind [ARENA's] wide
>   margin of victory."
>SOURCE: O'Dwyer's PR Daily, April 7, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081310401
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081310401
>
>12. THANKS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY
>http://www.corpwatch.org/issues/PID.jsp?articleid=10548
>   Leslie Green at Stapleton Communications has a bachelor's degree in
>   Marketing Communications from California Polytechnic State
>   University, which must be where she learned how to stonewall
>   reporters while still sounding upbeat. A detailed new investigative
>   report charges her client, AXT Inc., with poisoning its workers
>   with gallium arsenide, a potent carcinogen used to make
>   semiconductors. Asked for comments prior to publication of the
>   story, Green replied: "We do appreciate the opportunity to respond
>   to, I guess, some of the questions that you have for AXT. We are
>   going to pass on the opportunity to participate in your article at
>   this point, but again, I do appreciate the opportunity."
>SOURCE: East Bay Express, April 7, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081310400
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081310400
>
>13. TEED OFF AT AUGUSTA
>http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2004/golf/specials/masters/2004/04/07/gp_battle0406/index.html
>   Crisis management PR pro Jim McCarthy says his clients have run
>   afoul of "the media/ activist industrial complex." Case in point:
>   Augusta National hired McCarthy when Martha Burk challenged the
>   golf club's policy of not admitting women members. But McCarthy's
>   prime target wasn't Burk: "Stopping The New York Times dead in its
>   tracks was critical... because the Times sets the agenda for the
>   broader media world." He fed information to conservative bloggers
>   so that news stories would be read "with the lens that you
>   created." His efforts paid off as the Times' Augusta coverage was
>   increasingly questioned: "The story is no longer sex discrimination
>   but journalistic integrity. That is how you turn down the heat on a
>   crisis, by changing the subject."
>SOURCE: Sports Illustrated, April 6, 2004
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/April_2004.html#1081224000
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1081224000
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at PR Watch.
>To subscribe or unsubcribe, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found at the
>Spin of the Day" section of the PR Watch website:
>http://www.prwatch.org/spin/index.html
>
>Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at:
>http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues
>
>PR Watch, Spin of the Day and the Weekly Spin are projects
>of the Center for Media & Democracy, a nonprofit organization
>that offers investigative reporting on the public relations
>industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and
>misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of
>secretive, little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that
>work to control political debates and public opinion.
>Please send any questions or suggestions about our
>publications to:
>(editor /at/ prwatch.org)
>
>Contributions to the Center for Media & Democracy
>are tax-deductible. Send checks to:
>    CMD
>    520 University Ave. #310
>    Madison, WI 53703
>
>To donate now online, visit:
>https://www.egrants.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2344-0|1118-0
>_______________________________________________
>Weekly-Spin mailing list
>(Weekly-Spin /at/ prwatch.org)
>http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/weekly-spin

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carpentier Nico (Phd)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Katholieke Universiteit Brussel - Catholic University of Brussels
Vrijheidslaan 17 - B-1081 Brussel - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-412.42.78
F: ++ 32 (0)2/412.42.00
Office: 4/0/18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Free University of Brussels
Centre for Media Sociology (CeMeSO)
Pleinlaan 2 - B-1050 Brussels - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-629.18.30
F: ++ 32 (0)2-629.28.61
Office: C0.05
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
European Consortium for Communication Research
Web: http://www.eccr.info
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mail: (Nico.Carpentier /at/ kubrussel.ac.be)
Web: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------  


----------------
ECCR-Mailing list
---
To unsubscribe, send an email message to (majordomo /at/ listserv.vub.ac.be)
with in the body of the message (NOT in the subject): unsubscribe eccr
---
ECCR - European Consortium for Communications Research
Secretariat: P.O. Box 106, B-1210 Brussels 21, Belgium
Tel.: +32-2-412 42 78/47
Fax.: +32-2-412 42 00
Email: (freenet002 /at/ pi.be) or (Rico.Lie /at/ pi.be)
URL: http://www.eccr.info
----------------


[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]