Archive for 2003

(From 2002 until 2005, this mailing list was called the ECCR mailing list)
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]

[eccr] The Weekly Spin, Wednesday, November 12, 2003

Thu Nov 13 15:23:37 GMT 2003


>THE WEEKLY SPIN, Wednesday, November 12, 2003
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>sponsored by PR WATCH (www.prwatch.org)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to
>further information about current public relations campaigns.
>It is emailed free each Wednesday to subscribers.
>
>SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS)
>Who do you know who might want to receive Spin of the Week?
>Help us grow our subscriber list!  Just forward this message to
>people you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link:
>
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>THIS WEEK'S NEWS
>
>1. US Officials Want Ban On British Protests
>2. Pentagon's Iraqi Media Network 'Fair And Balanced'
>3. Wesley Clark Campaigns Wrapped in the Flag
>4. The Center for Media & Democracy Needs Your Support!
>5. PR Watch Second Quarter Issue Now Online
>6. Cronkite Fires Back at VNR Producer
>7. Newman's Own Boosts McDonald's
>8. Miami Police "Embed" Journalists For Trade Protests
>9. Jessica Lynch Proves Her Courage & Integrity
>10. Image Is Everything in Bush's Propaganda War
>11. Lynch Says Military Should Not Have Filmed Her Rescue
>12. Bush Shifts War Justification To Democracy
>13. Jessica Lynch: The Symbol Clashes
>14. Street Poet As Stealth Huckster for Nissan
>15. Recovery or Snow Job?
>16. Battle Hymn of the New Liberal Media
>17. Deceivers or Deluded?
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>1. US OFFICIALS WANT BAN ON BRITISH PROTESTS
>http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=462900
>   When George W. Bush visits London next week, U.S. officials want to
>   keep protesters out of sight, demanding a rolling "exclusion zone"
>   around the President. "The Stop The War Coalition said yesterday
>   that it had been told by the police that it would not be allowed to
>   demonstrate in Parliament Square and Whitehall next Thursday - a
>   ban it said it was determined to resist," the Independent reports.
>   "The coalition says that it has also been told by British officials
>   that American officials want a distance kept between Mr Bush and
>   protesters, for security reasons and to prevent their appearance in
>   the same television shots. ... The mayor of London, Ken
>   Livingstone, said yesterday that Mr Bush should not be shielded
>   from public anger about the Iraq war, and Londoners should not have
>   to pick up the £4m policing bill. He said: 'To create a situation
>   in which perhaps 60,000 people remain unseen would require a
>   shutdown of central London which is just not acceptable.'"
>SOURCE: Independent (UK), November 12, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068613204
>
>2. PENTAGON'S IRAQI MEDIA NETWORK 'FAIR AND BALANCED'
>http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0346/cotts.php
>   The U.S. sponsored Iraqi Media Network -- planned to include a
>   24-hour satellite channel, two land-based TV channels, two radio
>   channels, a national newspaper and studios in every major Iraqi
>   region -- promises Iraqis "comprehensive, accurate, fair, and
>   balanced news." The Village Voice's Cynthia Cotts reports, however,
>   that IMN already faces credibility issues. Budgeted at $100 million
>   (part of the $87.5 billion approved for Iraq), the project's money
>   will flow through the Defense Department's Special Operations and
>   Low-Intensity Conflict division, which also handles military
>   psy-ops. "Critics say the network's mission is weakened by its
>   contradictory goals. So far IMN is touted as both the voice of an
>   occupying military force and an inspiration for Iraqis to produce
>   fair and balanced news coverage. But many Iraqis have already
>   dubbed the network a propaganda organ. (As if to underscore that
>   impression, IMN recently ran a speech by CPA administrator Paul
>   Bremer in which he spoke repeatedly of Hussein as 'the evil one.')
>   A recent poll found that 35 percent of Iraqis now have satellite
>   receivers, and of those, 67 percent prefer to get TV news from the
>   satellite channels Al Arabiya and Al Jazeera, rather than from
>   IMN," Cotts writes.
>SOURCE: Village Voice, November 12, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068613203
>
>3. WESLEY CLARK CAMPAIGNS WRAPPED IN THE FLAG
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/12/politics/12CLAR.html?ex=1069648567&ei=1&en=3e9515bd12aa8d94
>   The New York Times reports that former general and corporate
>   lobbyist, now presidential candidate Wesley Clark supports "a
>   proposed constitutional amendment that would make it illegal to
>   desecrate the American flag by burning or other means, a position
>   that puts him at odds with many constituencies in the Democratic
>   Party and several other candidates for the Democratic nomination
>   for president." Changing the U.S. Constitution to ban flag
>   desecration has been criticized for years as a dangerous attack on
>   free speech and dissent. Clark announced his positiion before the
>   American Legion, a well-funded group long behind the amendment
>   through the Citizens Flag Alliance. The CFA has been represented by
>   PR and lobby heavyweights including Burson-Marsteller and Belanger
>   Consulting.
>SOURCE: New York Times, Wednesday, November 12, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068613202
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068613202
>
>4. THE CENTER FOR MEDIA & DEMOCRACY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!
>https://secure.groundspring.org/dn/index.php?id=1118&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eprwatch%2Eorg%2Fbooks%2Fwmd%2Ehtml
>   Please help to support our work here at the Center for Media &
>   Democracy with a donation of $35, $100, $1,000 or more. You can
>   securely donate on-line with a credit card. Contributors of at
>   least $35 dollars will receive a subscription to our award winning
>   quarterly PR Watch, now in its tenth year. To ensure independence
>   we refuse to accept corporate or government grants or advertising,
>   and depend on concerned individuals like you. Consider contributing
>   $100 or more to receive a complimentary signed copy of our
>   bestselling book, Weapons of Mass Deception. The Center remains the
>   only public interest organization in the world dedicated to
>   exposing and countering special interest propaganda, and we need
>   your help now more than ever. Thank you!
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068613201
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068613201
>
>5. PR WATCH SECOND QUARTER ISSUE NOW ONLINE
>http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2003Q2/index.html
>   The second quarter 2003 issue of PR Watch is now available online,
>   featuring stories about the anti-environmental Wise Use movement's
>   propaganda campaign against fish in Oregon's Klamath Basin and an
>   excerpt from our latest book, Weapons of Mass Deception.
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068613200
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068613200
>
>6. CRONKITE FIRES BACK AT VNR PRODUCER
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/11/business/media/11walter.html
>   In a follow-up to events that we mentioned in May and discussed on
>   the PR Watch Forum, former CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite has
>   filed a lawsuit against WJMK, a Florida producer of video news
>   releases, seeking $25 million in damages and saying the company
>   misled him and tarnished his reputation when it persuaded him to
>   appear in videos that promoted prescription drugs and other
>   products. The company previously filed suit against Cronkite in
>   September after he tried to end a contract he had signed to appear
>   as the host of a series of videos, including some called American
>   Medical Review.
>SOURCE: New York Times, November 11, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068526800
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068526800
>
>7. NEWMAN'S OWN BOOSTS MCDONALD'S
>http://www.prweek.com/news/news_story.cfm?ID=194582&site=3
>   Faced with the nation's growing waistline and flat sales in recent
>   years, fast-food restaurants are relying on new products and PR to
>   help improve their image and their profit. "Mike Donahue, VP, US
>   communications and customer satisfaction for McDonald's, notes that
>   PR pioneered McDonald's integrated marketing push on its salads,"
>   PR Week writes. "The company aligned its salads with Paul Newman's
>   Newman's Own brand of salad dressings, offering those dressings for
>   its new product. Newman's Own is highly regarded in the world of
>   natural and organic foods. The company donates its profits to
>   charitable and educational causes, giving more than $150 million
>   since 1982. 'We felt the social responsibility connection would be
>   impactful,' says Donahue. McDonald's launched its salads in March
>   with a New York press event featuring Newman. PR from that sent
>   salad sales up 15% even before advertising started, Donahue says.
>   'There was real credibility with Newman,' he recalls."
>SOURCE: PR Week, November 10, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068440402
>
>8. MIAMI POLICE "EMBED" JOURNALISTS FOR TRADE PROTESTS
>http://www.editorandpublisher.com/editorandpublisher/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=2024436
>   Miami police will be "embedding" reporters with police squads
>   during next week's protests against trade negotiations.The
>   Associated Press reports, Police Chief John Timoney said his
>   embedding plan would place journalists on the front lines during
>   the Free Trade Area of the Americas talks taking place in Miami.
>   Police expect tens of thousands of demonstrators. "The news
>   organizations invited to participate in the embedding include The
>   Associated Press, NBC, Reuters, The Miami Herald, CNN, Fox and
>   several TV stations. The police are still drawing up the rules
>   reporters must follow, so individual organizations have not
>   officially agreed yet to participate," AP writes. "The journalists
>   will be responsible for their own safety and will be required to
>   have a riot helmet and gas mask. Journalists are also required to
>   sign a release form as well as agree not to report on such things
>   as the number of officers in a unit or how many units are
>   participating in an event."
>SOURCE: Editor & Publisher, November 10, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068440401
>
>9. JESSICA LYNCH PROVES HER COURAGE & INTEGRITY
>http://www.buzzflash.com/editorial/03/11/edi03002.html
>   Buzzflash editorializes, "So this, in summary, is what happened:
>   The Bush Cartel Ministry of Truth heard that a young blonde female
>   soldier was severely injured and they made up a heroic story about
>   her, as part of their ongoing Iraq-war attempt to manipulate
>   American public opinion. And what does Jessica Lynch do? She has
>   the nerve to toss out the script the propagandists wrote for her.
>   She has the audacity to speak for herself. She has the American
>   heartland respect for the truth. She became a hero, in an entirely
>   different role than the Bush Cartel wrote for her. Jessica Lynch,
>   the young woman who joined the army after she was turned down for a
>   position at Wal-Mart has something no one else in the Bush Cartel
>   has -- or anyone in the fawning corporate media -- or anyone of the
>   braying 'amen choir' of millionaire GOP television and radio
>   pundits: Jessica Lynch has integrity."
>SOURCE: Buzzflash, November 10, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068440400
>
>10. IMAGE IS EVERYTHING IN BUSH'S PROPAGANDA WAR
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/09/arts/09RICH.html?ex=1069420430&ei=1&en=cb9eb90b23f0b950
>   Frank Rich writes, "Ah, the dazzling pyrotechnics of 'shock and
>   awe.' The finality of the toppling of Saddam Hussein's statue. The
>   thrill of that re-enactment of 'Top Gun.' The sense of closure
>   provided by the banner reading 'Mission Accomplished.' Like all
>   wars of the TV age, the war in Iraq is not just a clash of armies,
>   but a succession of iconic images. Those who control the images,
>   and the narratives they encapsulate, control history. At least
>   until a new reality crashes in. ... The Bush administration tries
>   to shut down pictures as effectively as it has stonewalled
>   Congressional committees and the bipartisan commissions looking
>   into intelligence failures surrounding 9/11."
>SOURCE: New York Times, November 9, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068354000
>
>11. LYNCH SAYS MILITARY SHOULD NOT HAVE FILMED HER RESCUE
>http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/031107/w110724.html
>   "Former prisoner of war Jessica Lynch said the U.S. military was
>   wrong to manipulate the story of her dramatic rescue and should not
>   have filmed it in the first place. ... 'It's wrong,' she said." As
>   we report in Weapons of Mass Deception, the filming of Lynch's
>   rescue was done by the Pentagon's own propaganda unit called Combat
>   Camera. No real journalists participated in or filmed the event as
>   it happened. Film was later provided by the Pentagon to the news
>   media. Lynch's book written by Rick Bragg claims she was raped,
>   although she has no memory of being raped and her Iraqi doctors who
>   saved her life are saying they saw no evidence of sexual assault
>   and they are wondering why such sensational claims are being made.
>SOURCE: Associated Press, November 8, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068267600
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068267600
>
>12. BUSH SHIFTS WAR JUSTIFICATION TO DEMOCRACY
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10003-2003Nov6.html
>   Addressing the National Endowment for Democracy, George W. Bush
>   said that "the United States must commit itself to a decades-long
>   transformation of the Middle East and termed the U.S. occupation of
>   Iraq a turning point in the future of worldwide democracy," the
>   Washington Post reports. "Bush's speech was the latest effort by
>   the administration to stop the slipping support for the U.S.
>   occupation of Iraq at home and abroad. Though he had previously
>   mentioned the spread of Mideast democracy as a justification for
>   the invasion of Iraq, Bush elevated that rationale to primacy
>   yesterday, making no mention of weapons of mass destruction and
>   only passing reference to national security and terrorism." But
>   Washington has a "long-standing credibility problem" in the Middle
>   East. "In the past, every time a U.S. official has talked about
>   democracy and responsible government, people in the region have
>   looked at them and said, 'You're running against a 50-year legacy
>   of doing the opposite.' We grew up understanding that the United
>   States would not tolerate real democracy as we'd end up with
>   governments or leaders or ideologies that were not compatible with
>   the West," Hisham Melhem, an Arab journalist and commentator, told
>   the Post.
>SOURCE: Washington Post, November 7, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068181201
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068181201
>
>13. JESSICA LYNCH: THE SYMBOL CLASHES
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/07/national/07LYNC.html
>   In her first significant public interview, Private Jessica Lynch
>   has debunked many of the official stories told by the U.S. military
>   about her personal heroics, abuse at the hands of Iraqis, and
>   rescue. "It hurt in a way that people would make up stories that
>   they had no truth about," Lynch said, adding that it bothered her
>   that "they used me as a way to symbolize all this stuff. Yeah, it's
>   wrong." Meanwhile, an NBC docudrama about Lynch's rescue is taking
>   as many liberties with the truth as the Pentagon. Mohammed Odeh
>   al-Rehaief, the Iraqi who led the Americans to Lynch, is the focus
>   of the NBC documentary and was reportedly an advisor to NBC on the
>   film that lionizes his heroism. After the rescue he was granted
>   asylum in the US and given a job at the powerful DC lobby shop run
>   by Republican Bob Livingston and Democrat Toby Moffet. Livingston
>   has personally lobbied in the past for GE, the parent company of
>   NBC. The movie is likely to spur sales of Mohammed's book which is
>   being promoted by his lobbyist co-worker Lauri Fitz-Pegado. She
>   was, in 1990, the account supervisor for the Hill & Knowlton PR
>   firm's lucrative work with the front group "Citizens for a Free
>   Kuwait" which featured the phony and now infamous "Nayirah" claims
>   about Iraqi soldiers killing babies in hospitals.
>SOURCE: New York Times, November 7, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068181200
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068181200
>
>14. STREET POET AS STEALTH HUCKSTER FOR NISSAN
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/business/media/06adco.html?ex=1069559522&ei=1&en=c50fc79789f5a9e7
>   "Nissan Motors is planting actors in movie theaters to perform live
>   commercials before the start of showings of 'The Matrix
>   Revolutions' in an effort to expose jaded, skeptical consumers to
>   advertising by masking it as something else. The brief in-person
>   pitches feature actors scattered among the ticket-buying audience
>   who stand and deliver lines that evoke the words spoken by poets at
>   events known as slams or jams. Their performances are timed to
>   accompany a commercial the audience sees on the movie screen, which
>   begins without identifying the sponsor but concludes with the
>   Nissan Altima logo. The campaign by the Nissan North America
>   division of Nissan Motor, intended to pique the curiosity of
>   younger consumers about the Nissan Altima sedan, began yesterday in
>   theaters operated by the Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corporation
>   in seven large markets and is scheduled to continue through
>   tomorrow."
>SOURCE: New York Times, November 6, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068094800
>
>15. RECOVERY OR SNOW JOB?
>http://www.tompaine.com/op_ads/opad2.cfm/ID/9315
>   Recent news reports have heralded a recent jump in the U.S. Gross
>   Domestic Product (GDP) as signs that the economy is turning around.
>   The question, however is, "Which economy?" While the GDP grew 7.2%
>   last quarter, 146,000 jobs were lost. That's good news for
>   corporate CEOs, but bad news for most of the rest of us. And
>   economists warn that even the boost to the CEO economy is a
>   temporary "sugar high" that won't last once markets respond to
>   tolerate the fiscal recklessness and heavy debt the White House has
>   embraced. As Jonathan Tahini observes, "GDP was never meant to be
>   such a central factor in describing economic growth" and its
>   current use for that purpose produces a grossly distorted picture.
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068047397
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068047397
>
>16. BATTLE HYMN OF THE NEW LIBERAL MEDIA
>http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1016-06.htm
>   If corporations can play the talk radio game, so can labor unions.
>   United Auto Workers has put money and resources into developing the
>   i.e. America Radio Network, which syndicates liberal talk radio
>   from coast to coast. "Following on i.e.'s successes, AnShell media,
>   according to industry rumors, is on the verge of achieving funding
>   goals to roll out America's second liberal radio network in
>   January," notes i.e. America talker Thom Hartmann. "Al Gore and
>   Joel Hyatt are talking about a cable TV network to take on Fox
>   News. ... Progressive business people and labor unions are learning
>   from the success of conservative media that with a good business
>   plan and a little patience it's possible to both advance your
>   side's social/political goals and to reach customers and potential
>   members. Working together with progressive talent, liberal
>   activists, and progressive, democracy-oriented companies and
>   unions, America's "new liberal media" just may succeed in the
>   battle to wrest American back from the clutching fingers of the
>   extremist conservatives who've held sway these past two decades."
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068017119
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068017119
>
>17. DECEIVERS OR DELUDED?
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/05/opinion/05KRIS.html
>   The New York Times' Nicolas Kristof writes, "Ultimately, Saddam's
>   rule collapsed in part because he couldn't read Iraq and made
>   decisions based on hubris and bad information. These days,
>   President Bush and his aides are having the same problem. Critics
>   complain that they lied to the American public about how difficult
>   the war would be, but I fear the critics are wrong: they didn't
>   just fool us -- they also fooled themselves. Evidence suggests that
>   Mr. Bush and Dick Cheney may have actually believed that our troops
>   would be, as Mr. Cheney predicted, 'greeted as liberators.' The
>   administration chose to rely not on intelligence but on wishful
>   thinking, and it became intoxicated by the siren calls of Ahmad
>   Chalabi, a silver-tongued charlatan." Ever optimistic, Cheney cited
>   a Zogby International poll to back his claim that there is "very
>   positive news" in Iraq. But Kristof writes that pollster John Zogby
>   told him, "I was floored to see the spin that was put on it; some
>   of the numbers were not my numbers at all." Zogby points his finger
>   at the American Enterprise Institute, who commissioned the poll, as
>   the source of the spin. AEI's interpretation of Zogby's poll was
>   used by Cheney in an October "Meet the Press" appearance.
>SOURCE: New York Times, November 5, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/November_2003.html#1068008402
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1068008402
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at PR Watch.
>To subscribe or unsubcribe, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found at the
>Spin of the Day" section of the PR Watch website:
>http://www.prwatch.org/spin/index.html
>
>Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at:
>http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues
>
>PR Watch, Spin of the Day and the Weekly Spin are projects
>of the Center for Media & Democracy, a nonprofit organization
>that offers investigative reporting on the public relations
>industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and
>misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of
>secretive, little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that
>work to control political debates and public opinion.
>Please send any questions or suggestions about our
>publications to:
>(editor /at/ prwatch.org)
>
>Contributions to the Center for Media & Democracy
>are tax-deductible. Send checks to:
>    CMD
>    520 University Ave. #310
>    Madison, WI 53703
>
>To donate now online, visit:
>https://www.egrants.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2344-0|1118-0
>_______________________________________________
>Weekly-Spin mailing list
>(Weekly-Spin /at/ prwatch.org)
>http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/weekly-spin

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carpentier Nico (Phd)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Katholieke Universiteit Brussel - Catholic University of Brussels
Vrijheidslaan 17 - B-1081 Brussel - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-412.42.78
Office: 4/0/18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Free University of Brussels
Centre for Media Sociology (CeMeSO)
Pleinlaan 2 - B-1050 Brussels - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-629.18.30
Office: C0.05
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mail: (Nico.Carpentier /at/ kubrussel.ac.be)
Web: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------  


----------------
ECCR-Mailing list
---
To unsubscribe, send an email message to (majordomo /at/ listserv.vub.ac.be)
with in the body of the message (NOT in the subject): unsubscribe eccr
---
ECCR - European Consortium for Communications Research
Secretariat: P.O. Box 106, B-1210 Brussels 21, Belgium
Tel.: +32-2-412 42 78/47
Fax.: +32-2-412 42 00
Email: (freenet002 /at/ pi.be) or (Rico.Lie /at/ pi.be)
URL: http://www.eccr.info
----------------


[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]