Archive for 2003

(From 2002 until 2005, this mailing list was called the ECCR mailing list)
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]

[eccr] Re: The Weekly Spin, Wednesday, July 30, 2003

Wed Jul 30 09:08:18 GMT 2003


At 05:00 30/07/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>THE WEEKLY SPIN, Wednesday, July 30, 2003
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>sponsored by PR WATCH (www.prwatch.org)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to
>further information about current public relations campaigns.
>It is emailed free each Wednesday to subscribers.
>
>SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS)
>Who do you know who might want to receive Spin of the Week?
>Help us grow our subscriber list!  Just forward this message to
>people you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link:
>
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>THIS WEEK'S NEWS
>
>1. Citizens Boycott Sludge Conference
>2. Pentagon Says  ' Get Rich Betting On Terror! '
>3. Department of Justice Plugs USA Patriot Act
>4. Weapons of Mass Deception Reviewed
>5. Qorvis Communication Quacks For Kingdom
>6. Edelman Drops British American Tobacco Account
>7. White House Fumbles On 16-Word Crisis
>8. Moran's War
>9. Miller's 2nd Draft of History
>10. Mega PR Firm Plays Role In School Reform
>11. Dissent in Stars and Stripes
>12. PR Firm Advises MIT Research Center On Privacy Issue
>13. The War of Spin
>14. Drug Industry Front Scares Seniors With Radio Ads
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>1. CITIZENS BOYCOTT SLUDGE CONFERENCE
>http://www.commondreams.org/news2003/0728-05.htm
>   Sludge researchers, activists, and rural residents exposed to land
>   applied sewage sludges across the nation are boycotting today's
>   summit at the Hilton Alexandria Old Town, in Alexandria, Va.,
>   organized by the EPA, the Water Environment Research Foundation
>   (WERF) and the New England Biosolids and Residuals Association
>   (NEBRA). "We are boycotting this conference because its real
>   purpose is to create an illusion that EPA and the sludge industry
>   are concerned about people getting sick from sludge spreading.
>   Organizers have arranged this conference while continuing to malign
>   and intimidate scientists and citizens who raise concerns about
>   land application," said Barbara Rubin of Neighbors Against Toxic
>   Sludge. PR Watch editors Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber exposed
>   the sludge same in our 1995 book, Toxic Sludge Is Good For You.
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1059511606
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1059511606
>
>2. PENTAGON SAYS  ' GET RICH BETTING ON TERROR! '
>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/07/28/national1653EDT0669.DTL
>   "The Pentagon is setting up a stock-market style system in which
>   investors would bet on terror attacks, assassinations and other
>   events in the Middle East. Defense officials hope to gain
>   intelligence and useful predictions while investors who guessed
>   right would win profits. ... The Pentagon office overseeing the
>   program, called the Policy Analysis Market, said it was part of a
>   research effort 'to investigate the broadest possible set of new
>   ways to prevent terrorist attacks.' ... Investors would buy and
>   sell futures contracts -- essentially a series of predictions about
>   what they believe might happen in the Mideast. ... [T]he Policy
>   Analysis Market would be a joint program of the Pentagon's Defense
>   Advanced Research Projects Agency, known as DARPA, and two private
>   companies: Net Exchange [and ] ... The Economist magazine. DARPA
>   has received strong criticism from Congress for its Terrorism
>   Information Awareness program, a computerized surveillance program
>   that has raised privacy concerns. [U.S. Senator Ron] Wyden said the
>   Policy Analysis Market is under retired Adm. John Poindexter, the
>   head of the Terrorism Information Awareness program and, in the
>   1980s, a key figure in the Iran-Contra scandal."
>SOURCE: Associated Press, July 28, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1059364801
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1059364801
>
>3. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PLUGS USA PATRIOT ACT
>http://www.prweek.com/news/news_story.cfm?ID=186335&site=3
>   "The Department of Justice is going on the offensive against
>   critics of the USA Patriot Act," PR Week reports. Civil liberties
>   advocates criticize the legislation for removing checks on law
>   enforcement and undermining Constitutional rights, prompting some
>   state and local governments to pass resolutions condemning the act.
>   "Attorney General John Ashcroft and department spokespeople are now
>   aggressively speaking out to the public and the press with an eye
>   toward setting the record straight," PR Week writes. "Ashcroft used
>   a trip last week to Alaska, one of the states to pass a resolution
>   against the act, as an opportunity to speak out on the issue. He
>   said it was understandable that the public would be concerned about
>   invasions of privacy, but countered, 'We use these tools to secure
>   the liberties of our citizens. We use these tools to save innocent
>   lives.'" The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), however, says
>   that insufficient surveillance powers were not the reason
>   government failed to detect terrorist activities that led to the
>   9/11 attacks. "The [Congressional report on 9/11] shows that these
>   new powers were not needed and that instead the government must
>   effectively use those already at its disposal," said Laura W.
>   Murphy, Director of the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office.
>SOURCE: PR Week, July 28, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1059364800
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1059364800
>
>4. WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION REVIEWED
>http://www.prwatch.org/books/wmd_reviews.html
>   Weapons of Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War on
>   Iraq, the new book by Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber, arrives in
>   bookstores on Monday, and early book reviews have already begun
>   appearing. We have compiled a list of book reviews and will be
>   updating it periodically.
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1059198722
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1059198722
>
>5. QORVIS COMMUNICATION QUACKS FOR KINGDOM
>http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/0725saudis.htm
>   "Qorvis Communication is helping Saudi Arabia lash out at critics
>   who believe the 'blanked-out' section of the Congressional 9/11
>   report exposes the Kingdom's involvement in the terror attacks,"
>   O'Dwyer's PR reports. "The Bush Administration demanded that the
>   28-page section dealing with the role played by Saudi Arabia and
>   other governments in 9/11 be omitted from the 900-page report."
>   Qorvis has a $200,000 a month contract with the Kingdom for PR
>   work. Saudi Arabia spent $288,000 at Patton Boggs -- a well
>   connected D.C. lobbying firm and a Qorvis affiliate -- for
>   scheduling and accompanying Embassy officials to meetings with
>   Members of Congress and their staffers, according to a February
>   2003 O'Dwyer's story.
>SOURCE: O'Dwyer's PR Daily, July 25, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1059105601
>
>6. EDELMAN DROPS BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO ACCOUNT
>http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/0725edelman_drops_bat.htm
>   "Edelman PR Worldwide, which represents the National Dialogue on
>   Cancer, has dropped British American Tobacco as a client in
>   Malaysia, according to The Cancer Letter of July 25," O'Dwyer's PR
>   reports. "Richard and Daniel Edelman had signed a pledge that the
>   firm would not work for tobacco companies when it won the
>   non-profit group's account last October. Edelman's Kuala Lumpur
>   office, however, helped BAT promote 'social reporting,' issuing
>   press releases about scholarships for children of tobacco farmers.
>   Leslie Dach, Edelman's vice chairman, terminated that project when
>   contacted by a reporter from TCL. 'Our policy is that we don't do
>   work for tobacco companies through our companies anywhere in the
>   world,' he told the publication. Dach said the Malaysian BAT work
>   slipped through the cracks," O'Dwyer's writes.
>SOURCE: O'Dwyer's PR, July 25, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1059105600
>
>7. WHITE HOUSE FUMBLES ON 16-WORD CRISIS
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37481-2003Jul23.html?nav=hptop_ts
>   "If President Bush's White House is known for anything, it is
>   competence at delivering a disciplined message and deftness in
>   dealing with bad news," Washington Post's Dan Balz and Walter
>   Pincus write. "That reputation has been badly damaged by the
>   administration's clumsy efforts to explain how a statement based on
>   disputed intelligence ended up in the president's State of the
>   Union address." The shifting White House story about it's
>   references to Iraq, Niger and uranium continues to draw attention
>   to the Bush administration deception. "White House allies outside
>   the government have expressed surprise at the administration's
>   repeated missteps over the past two weeks.... Said one senior
>   administration official, 'These stories get legs when they're
>   mishandled and this story has been badly mishandled.' Joe Lockhart,
>   who was press secretary to President Bill Clinton, said he has been
>   equally surprised by the way this White House has dealt with the
>   controversy. 'Their every move has resulted in people being more
>   interested in the story rather than less interested,' he said," the
>   Post reports.
>SOURCE: Washington Post, July 24, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1059019200
>
>8. MORAN'S WAR
>http://www.sbs.com.au/dateline/trans.php3?dte=2003-07-23&title=Paul+Moran+Story
>   During the war in Iraq, Paul Moran, a TV cameraman for the
>   Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), was killed by a suicide
>   bomber. After his death, his hometown newspaper discovered that
>   Moran also worked for the Rendon Group, a secretive public
>   relations firm that works with the Pentagon. Now additional
>   information has come to light showing that Moran played an
>   important role with the Iraqi National Congress (INC), a PR front
>   created by Rendon, in feeding stories to the press about Iraq's
>   alleged weapons programs from Iraqi defector Adnan Ihsan Saeed al
>   Haideri. "The man who helped orchestrate publicity for al-Haideri
>   was Zaab Sethna, media spokesman for the INC," reports John
>   Hosking. "Sethna spent more than a decade working in and around
>   Iraq. Much of it with his Australian mate Paul Moran. After the INC
>   helped al Haideri escape from Iraq, it was Paul Moran who was
>   called in to do the one television interview that would go around
>   the world."
>SOURCE: Special Broadcasting Service (Australia), July 23, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1058932801
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1058932801
>
>9. MILLER'S 2ND DRAFT OF HISTORY
>http://www.mediainfo.com/editorandpublisher/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1938827
>   New York Times reporter Judith Miller has begun revising her first
>   draft of history, some two months after her widely criticized
>   stories made the case that evidence of Saddam's unconventional
>   weapons was being found. In a hindsight account written July 20,
>   Miller belatedly concluded that the postwar search for evidence was
>   plagued by "chaos, disorganization, interagency feuds, disputes
>   within and among military units, and shortages of everything. ...
>   To this day, whether Saddam Hussein possessed such weapons when the
>   war began remains unknown." But as William E. Jackson Jr. notes, it
>   was Miller's own stories in April and May that "made it appear a
>   great deal was being discovered that served to demonstrate the
>   validity of the administration's major reasons for a pre-emptive
>   attack. ... Only after Miller's reporting came under fire from
>   reporters within the Times and in the pages of the Post -- among
>   other newspapers and journals -- did the editors couple her with
>   William Broad to write more skeptically about the alleged successes
>   of the WMD search. ... It is puzzling that a star reporter caught
>   in highly misleading reporting on WMDs would be so protected from
>   the consequences of her actions. Disturbing questions are raised
>   when the Times publishes big stories that travel the same winding
>   road as the Bush administration on the very grave matter of why
>   American soldiers were sent off to war."
>SOURCE: Editor and Publisher, July 23, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1058932800
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1058932800
>
>10. MEGA PR FIRM PLAYS ROLE IN SCHOOL REFORM
>http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/0722fitz.htm
>   "Civic Progress, a St. Louis-based group made up of the heads of
>   the region's largest corporations, is paying Jay Lawrence, who is
>   co-chairman of Fleishman-Hillard's corporate reputation management
>   unit, to play a behind-the-scenes role in the city school reform
>   effort," O'Dwyer's PR reports. "The St. Louis Post-Dispatch said
>   the 54-year-old Lawrence, who is a senior VP at F-H, was paid
>   $80,000 for his services to the school board. The paper said
>   Lawrence, who has been at the school board's side at every public
>   appearance since the end of June, has been coaching board members
>   through an almost daily barrage of criticism, setting up media
>   interviews and offering tours of the district's antiquated and
>   much-maligned warehouse. F-H is also donating the equivalent of two
>   full-time PR staffers to the board for the next several weeks. The
>   paper said the St. Louis Public Schools already spends $314,000
>   annually for PR. That includes the salary of a director, a
>   coordinator, a secretary and a student intern, plus printing and
>   other costs."
>SOURCE: O'Dwyer's PR Daily, July 22, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1058846403
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1058846403
>
>11. DISSENT IN STARS AND STRIPES
>http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=15991&archive=true
>   "As frustration over their lengthening deployment grows among
>   troops in Iraq, soldiers are smacking head-on into limits on their
>   public speech," writes Steve Liewer, a correspondent for the
>   European version of Stars and Stripes magazine. Troops interviewed
>   in Germany and Iraq say they have been briefed to refer questions
>   to a public affairs specialist and that soldiers have been getting
>   in trouble for speaking out. "I'm not comfortable telling you what
>   I really think, and I'm not going to lie to you, so it's better if
>   I just don't say anything," said one soldier. Another commented, "I
>   find it absurd that these same people we put our lives on the line
>   for can punish us for having our own opinions."
>SOURCE: Stars and Stripes, July 22, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1058846402
>
>12. PR FIRM ADVISES MIT RESEARCH CENTER ON PRIVACY ISSUE
>http://www.prweek.com/news/news_story.cfm?ID=185747&site=3
>   "A privacy group is blasting a unit of the Massachusetts Institute
>   of Technology for its PR plans for a controversial product-ID
>   technology and other internal documents labeled confidential that
>   were posted on its public website," PR Week's John Frank writes.
>   Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering
>   (CASPIAN) has been raising the red flag over privacy concerns
>   associated with the use of tiny radio-frequency transmitting ID
>   tags in consumer products. MIT's Auto-ID Center is developing the
>   devise, know as an RFID tag, which is said will be used to tell
>   retailers where products are. CASPIAN uncovered documents on the
>   Auto-ID Center's website prepared by PR firm Fleishman-Hillard
>   giving advise on how the center should handle privacy concerns and
>   win public acceptance for the tags. According to PR Week, the PR
>   plan recommends that external communications "convey inevitability
>   of technology" and that the center develop a plan that "neutralizes
>   opposition."
>SOURCE: PR Week, July 21, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1058760002
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1058760002
>
>13. THE WAR OF SPIN
>http://www.canada.com/edmonton/edmontonjournal/story.asp?id=EE414626-062D-4E0B-82D7-1DE6EEBDE060
>   David Kelly, the scientist whose suicide marked a tragic twist in
>   the unfolding controversy over British intelligence dossiers that
>   supported the war in Iraq, was "ripped apart in the middle" of a
>   "war of spin," said an editor at the British Broadcasting
>   Corporation. The BBC has come under intense criticism for its
>   reports alleging that top British officials "sexed up" the
>   dossiers, and now it is being criticized on grounds that its
>   reports may have contributed to Kelly's suicide. "Yes, we had a
>   role in it," the editor said. "But the BBC has looked at the way it
>   has handled this entire affair and at this stage we do not believe
>   we could have handled things differently." The BBC stands by its
>   reporting and says it has a tape-recorded interview with Kelly, as
>   well as other evidence showing that it accurately represented
>   Kelly's views. British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who has bitterly
>   criticized the BBC's reporting, is also coming under intense
>   criticism as government officials fight to evade responsibility for
>   outing Kelly publicly as the BBC's whistleblower. ""Some people
>   can't stop spinning - even now," commented a former Labour
>   minister.
>SOURCE: Daily Telegraph, July 20, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1058673600
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1058673600
>
>14. DRUG INDUSTRY FRONT SCARES SENIORS WITH RADIO ADS
>http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1058307010292&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154
>   A bipartisan group of lawmakers has condemned a radio scare
>   campaign sponsored by the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. "In a bid
>   to defeat legislation that would allow the 'reimportation' of
>   American-made drugs from Canada and Europe, a lobby group calling
>   itself the Seniors Coalition is questioning the safety of Canadian
>   and European prescription drugs," the Toronto Star reports.
>   Reimported drugs are cheaper for seniors to buy. The legislation is
>   part of the $400 billion, 10-year overhaul of the Medicare. "A
>   spokesperson for the Seniors Coalition, Christopher Butler, denied
>   his group is a 'front' for the pharmaceutical industry, but he
>   acknowledged receiving funding from big drug makers. He would not
>   say what proportion of its budget came from the industry," the Star
>   writes.
>SOURCE: Toronto Star, July 16, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
>    http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1058328000
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at PR Watch.
>To subscribe or unsubcribe, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found at the
>Spin of the Day" section of the PR Watch website:
>http://www.prwatch.org/spin/index.html
>
>Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at:
>http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues
>
>PR Watch, Spin of the Day and the Weekly Spin are projects
>of the Center for Media & Democracy, a nonprofit organization
>that offers investigative reporting on the public relations
>industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and
>misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of
>secretive, little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that
>work to control political debates and public opinion.
>Please send any questions or suggestions about our
>publications to:
>(editor /at/ prwatch.org)
>
>Contributions to the Center for Media & Democracy
>are tax-deductible. Send checks to:
>    CMD
>    520 University Ave. #310
>    Madison, WI 53703
>
>To donate now online, visit:
>https://www.egrants.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2344-0|1118-0
>_______________________________________________
>Weekly-Spin mailing list
>(Weekly-Spin /at/ prwatch.org)
>http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/weekly-spin

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carpentier Nico (Phd)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Free University Brussels
Studies on Media, Information & Telecommunication (SMIT)
Centre for Media Sociology (CeMeSO)
Office: C0.05
Pleinlaan 2 - B-1050 Brussels - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-629.18.30
F: ++ 32 (0)2-629.28.61
E-mail: (Nico.Carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
W1: http://smit.vub.ac.be/
W2: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 


----------------
ECCR-Mailing list
---
To unsubscribe, send an email message to (majordomo /at/ listserv.vub.ac.be)
with in the body of the message (NOT in the subject): unsubscribe eccr
---
ECCR - European Consortium for Communications Research
Secretariat: P.O. Box 106, B-1210 Brussels 21, Belgium
Tel.: +32-2-412 42 78/47
Fax.: +32-2-412 42 00
Email: (freenet002 /at/ pi.be) or (Rico.Lie /at/ pi.be)
URL: http://www.eccr.info
----------------


[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]