(From 2002 until 2005, this mailing list was called the ECCR mailing list)
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[eccr] Fwd: The Weekly Spin, Wednesday, August 13, 2003
Wed Aug 13 07:29:02 GMT 2003
>THE WEEKLY SPIN, Wednesday, August 13, 2003
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>sponsored by PR WATCH (www.prwatch.org)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to
>further information about current public relations campaigns.
>It is emailed free each Wednesday to subscribers.
>
>SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS)
>Who do you know who might want to receive Spin of the Week?
>Help us grow our subscriber list! Just forward this message to
>people you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link:
>
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>THIS WEEK'S NEWS
>
>1. Fox Sues Franken
>2. WMD Sells, Despite Media Blackout
>3. Techies, Politics Now Click
>4. White House Exaggerated Iraq's Nuclear Threat
>5. GIs Say: "Bring Us Home"
>6. White House Accused Of Distorting And Suppressing Data
>7. Suit Challenges Global Warming Report
>8. Free Cigs For Celebs
>9. Ashcroft Goes On Victory Tour
>10. Bad Call on Iraq
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>1. FOX SUES FRANKEN
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/12/nyregion/12FRAN.html
> The Fox News Network is suing comedian Al Franken in an effort to
> block publication of his upcoming new book, Lies and the Lying
> Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right. The
> lawsuit claims that Franken's title infringes Fox's copyright on
> the phrase "fair and balanced," and characterizes Franken as
> "shrill and unstable," a "parasite" whose behavior is "either
> intoxicated or deranged." Evidently the network is still fuming
> over Franken's hilarious, televised run-in with Fox commentator
> Bill O'Reilly at a recent book publishers' convention.
>SOURCE: New York Times, August 12, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/August_2003.html#1060660800
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060660800
>
>2. WMD SELLS, DESPITE MEDIA BLACKOUT
>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/08/10/RVBESTSELLERS.DTL&type=printable
> The mainstream broadcast media in the U.S. have thus far avoided
> reviewing Weapons of Mass Deception, the new book by PR Watch
> editors Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber. Nevertheless, the book
> debuted this week at #4 on the San Francisco Chronicle's paperback
> best-seller list. The book has also received strong reviewed from a
> number of newspapers and from national media outlets in England and
> Australia. Check out our updated list of reviews, including our
> Friday interview on Democracy Now.
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/August_2003.html#1060652112
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060652112
>
>3. TECHIES, POLITICS NOW CLICK
>http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-geeks11aug11000416,1,3687057.story?coll=la-headlines-business-manual
> "After years as political agnostics, the programmers and engineers
> who orchestrated the technological revolution of the 1990s are
> trying to reboot government," writes Joseph Menn. "They have money,
> earned during the boom. They have time, found since the bust. And
> they are using their technological savvy to recruit even casual
> Internet users to their causes." Menn looks at the new
> "techno-populists" such as MoveOn.org and DigitalConsumer.org.
>SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, August 11, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/August_2003.html#1060574400
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060574400
>
>4. WHITE HOUSE EXAGGERATED IRAQ'S NUCLEAR THREAT
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A39500-2003Aug9.html
> In an article based on "interviews with analysts and policymakers
> inside and outside the U.S. government, and access to internal
> documents and technical evidence not previously made public," the
> Washington Post's Barton Gellman and Walter Pincus report the White
> House overstated Iraq's nuclear threat in its case to go to war.
> "The new information indicates a pattern in which President Bush,
> Vice President Cheney and their subordinates -- in public and
> behind the scenes -- made allegations depicting Iraq's nuclear
> weapons program as more active, more certain and more imminent in
> its threat than the data they had would support. On occasion
> administration advocates withheld evidence that did not conform to
> their views. The White House seldom corrected misstatements or
> acknowledged loss of confidence in information upon which it had
> previously relied," Gellman and Pincus write.
>SOURCE: Washington Post, August 10, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060488001
>
>5. GIS SAY: "BRING US HOME"
>http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1015711,00.html
> Breaking the traditional silence of military families during time
> of war, Susan Schuman is complaining loudly about the government
> decisions that sent her son Justin to Iraq. "I want them to bring
> our troops home," she says. "I am appalled at Bush's policies. He
> has got us into a terrible mess." Soldiers and their families are
> airing their grievances using a weapon not available during
> previous wars: the Internet. "Somewhere down the line, we became an
> occupation force in [Iraqi] eyes. We don't feel like heroes any
> more," writes Private Isaac Kindblade of the 671st Engineer
> Company. Criticism is coming from retired soldier David Hackworth,
> Veterans for Common Sense, and Military Families Speak Out.
>SOURCE: Guardian (UK), August 10, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/August_2003.html#1060488000
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060488000
>
>6. WHITE HOUSE ACCUSED OF DISTORTING AND SUPPRESSING DATA
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/08/politics/08REPO.html
> A new study says the "Bush administration persistently manipulates
> scientific data to serve its ideology and protect the interests of
> its political supporters," the New York Times writes. The 40-page
> report, Politics and Science in the Bush Administration, was
> prepared at the request of Rep. Henry Waxman, the Government Reform
> Committee's ranking Democrat. From agricultural pollution to global
> warming to workplace safety, the Bush administration has
> compromised the scientific integrity of federal research,
> monitoring and regulatory institutions and "has manipulated the
> scientific process and distorted or suppressed scientific
> findings," the report says. "The administration's political
> interference with science has led to misleading statements by the
> president, inaccurate responses to Congress, altered Web sites,
> suppressed agency reports, erroneous international communications
> and the gagging of scientists," adds the report. White House press
> secretary Scott McClellan dismissed the report. According to the
> Times, McCellen "contended that its sponsor, Mr. Waxman, who is
> widely known for his aggressive inquiry into the tobacco industry,
> was seeking to score political points."
>SOURCE: New York Times, August 8, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/August_2003.html#1060315200
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060315200
>
>7. SUIT CHALLENGES GLOBAL WARMING REPORT
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/07/politics/07DATA.html?ei=1&en=e9368ec46a4cfa2d&ex=1061278901&pagewanted=print&position=
> The Competitive Enterprise Institute, a Washington DC-based think
> tank that is funded by right-wing foundations and industries that
> deny global warming, sued the Bush administration over its 2000
> report on climate change. The New York Times reports CEI is trying
> to stop the government from distributing the report, saying it is
> inaccurate and biased. The suit says the report violates the
> Federal Data Quality Act, a little known law passed in December
> 2000 that requires information disseminated by the government to
> pass standards for objectivity, quality, and utility. While
> sounding like reasonable lawmaking, the watchdog group Public
> Citizen warns that FDQA is "susceptible to misuse by opponents of
> regulatory safeguards who may attempt to exploit the Act to
> dissuade agencies from disseminating information to the public or
> engaging in protective rulemaking."
>SOURCE: New York Times, August 7, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/August_2003.html#1060228801
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060228801
>
>8. FREE CIGS FOR CELEBS
>http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20030807/APN/308070620
> "A tobacco company is offering a free lifetime supply of cigarettes
> to celebrity smokers as part of a guerrilla marketing campaign to
> raise the public profile of its recently launched brand," the
> Associated Press reports. "In a tersely worded pitch, Freedom
> Tobacco International Inc. said it was seeking to 'seed' its
> cigarettes with adult celebrities. The appeal was made Tuesday to
> publicists through a Web-based network subscribed to by hundreds of
> public relations agencies. ... Freedom paid covert actresses,
> called 'leaners,' to smoke the cigarettes in Manhattan bars and
> nightclubs for several weeks this spring in a New York effort to
> promote the fledgling brand, company spokeswoman Nancy Tamosaitis
> said. The company is also behind the Right to Smoke Coalition, a
> group organized to fight bans against public smoking, like the one
> recently enacted in New York City," AP reports.
>SOURCE: Sarasota Herald Tribune, August 7, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060228800
>
>9. ASHCROFT GOES ON VICTORY TOUR
>http://www.nydailynews.com/08-06-2003/news/wn_report/story/106872p-96686c.html
> "Attorney General John Ashcroft is hitting the road to rally
> support for the Victory Act, which would further expand his powers
> to go after Al Qaeda and narcoterrorists," the New York Daily News
> reports. Ashcroft's 10-day tour will visit 20-states promoting his
> Vital Interdiction of Criminal Terrorist Organizations Act. Critics
> say expanding Ashcroft's powers would further erode civil
> liberites. The Victory Act if passed would "clamp down on Arab
> hawala transactions, where cash exchanged in an honor system has
> been funneled to terrorists; get business records without a court
> order in terrorism probes and delay notification; track wireless
> communications with a roving warrant; and increase sentences for
> drug kingpins to 40 years in prison and $4 million in fines," the
> Daily News reports. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch
> (R-Utah) is expected to introduce the Victory Act next month.
>SOURCE: New York Daily News, August 6, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/August_2003.html#1060142401
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060142401
>
>10. BAD CALL ON IRAQ
>http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.cgi?database=Hacks%20Target.db&command=viewone&op=t&id=28&rnd=151.93229315426774
> Maverick ex-soldier David Hackworth believed the Bush
> administration's claims about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction
> until recently, but now he's steamed. "A whole bunch of folks here
> in the USA and around this beat-up globe are all worked up over
> George W. Bush's 16 shifty words in his 'Let's Do Saddam' State of
> the Union speech when they should be taking a harder look at the
> president's judgment on the most critical matter to a state: war,"
> Hackworth writes. "Don't have heartburn over those 16 words. Have
> it instead over the folks who've gotten our nation in a megamess
> that might cost hundreds more casualties and around $100 billion by
> Christmas, a figure this regime's Liars Club is busy doing its best
> to hide."
>SOURCE: Soldiers for the Truth, August 5, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1060056000
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at PR Watch.
>To subscribe or unsubcribe, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found at the
>Spin of the Day" section of the PR Watch website:
>http://www.prwatch.org/spin/index.html
>
>Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at:
>http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues
>
>PR Watch, Spin of the Day and the Weekly Spin are projects
>of the Center for Media & Democracy, a nonprofit organization
>that offers investigative reporting on the public relations
>industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and
>misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of
>secretive, little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that
>work to control political debates and public opinion.
>Please send any questions or suggestions about our
>publications to:
>(editor /at/ prwatch.org)
>
>Contributions to the Center for Media & Democracy
>are tax-deductible. Send checks to:
> CMD
> 520 University Ave. #310
> Madison, WI 53703
>
>To donate now online, visit:
>https://www.egrants.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2344-0|1118-0
>_______________________________________________
>Weekly-Spin mailing list
>(Weekly-Spin /at/ prwatch.org)
>http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/weekly-spin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carpentier Nico (Phd)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Free University Brussels
Studies on Media, Information & Telecommunication (SMIT)
Centre for Media Sociology (CeMeSO)
Office: C0.05
Pleinlaan 2 - B-1050 Brussels - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-629.18.30
F: ++ 32 (0)2-629.28.61
E-mail: (Nico.Carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
W1: http://smit.vub.ac.be/
W2: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
ECCR-Mailing list
---
To unsubscribe, send an email message to (majordomo /at/ listserv.vub.ac.be)
with in the body of the message (NOT in the subject): unsubscribe eccr
---
ECCR - European Consortium for Communications Research
Secretariat: P.O. Box 106, B-1210 Brussels 21, Belgium
Tel.: +32-2-412 42 78/47
Fax.: +32-2-412 42 00
Email: (freenet002 /at/ pi.be) or (Rico.Lie /at/ pi.be)
URL: http://www.eccr.info
----------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]