(From 2002 until 2005, this mailing list was called the ECCR mailing list)
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[eccr] Fwd: The Weekly Spin, Wednesday, June 4, 2003
Mon Jun 09 12:17:58 GMT 2003
>THE WEEKLY SPIN, Wednesday, June 4, 2003
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>sponsored by PR WATCH (www.prwatch.org)
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to
>further information about current public relations campaigns.
>It is emailed free each Wednesday to subscribers.
>
>SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS)
>Who do you know who might want to receive Spin of the Week?
>Help us grow our subscriber list! Just forward this message to
>people you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link:
>
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>THIS WEEK'S NEWS
>
>1. Weapons of Mass Deception
>2. Sell Job on Iraq -- Worst Scandal Ever in US Politics?
>3. America's Matrix
>4. PR Firm Gets 'Public Interest' Groups Fronting for Industry
>5. Efforts to Contain Mad Cow Disease Fall Short
>6. FCC Ruling Fuels Movement for Media Democracy
>7. Show Me The Weapons
>8. Hyping the Heck out of Nanotech, the Next Biotech
>9. Spun Doctors
>10. Feeding the Rage
>11. War on Iraq Reads Like One Big 'Wag the Dog' Tale
>12. Save Our Spooks
>13. FCC Favors Industry Over Consumers
>14. The Unseen War
>15. Status Report on Iraq War Myths
>16. Former Hill & Knowlton Chair Calls PR 'A Game'
>17. HRT Maker's PR Activities Raise Concern
>18. Spinning Global Capitalism
>19. Trust In Media Keeps Slipping
>20. Middle East TV To Take Cues From American Cable News
>21. "Wal-Martizing" the Media
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>1. WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION
>http://www.prwatch.org/books/wmd.html
> PR Watch editors Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber have written a
> new book, titled Weapons of Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda
> in Bush's War on Iraq. Available in bookstores on July 28, Weapons
> of Mass Deception will be the first book to expose the aggressive
> public relations campaign used to sell the American public on the
> war with Iraq. Journalists and book reviewers should email our
> office to request a review copy.
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2003.html#1054699200
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054699200
>
>2. SELL JOB ON IRAQ -- WORST SCANDAL EVER IN US POLITICS?
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/03/opinion/03KRUG.html?ex=1055646417&ei=1&en=c940ce95469728ba
> Columnist Paul Krugman writes that "the public was told that Saddam
> posed an imminent threat. If that claim was fraudulent, the selling
> of the war is arguably the worst scandal in American political
> history - worse than Watergate, worse than Iran-contra. Indeed, the
> idea that we were deceived into war makes many commentators so
> uncomfortable that they refuse to admit the possibility. But here's
> the thought that should make those commentators really
> uncomfortable. Suppose that this administration did con us into
> war. And suppose that it is not held accountable for its
> deceptions, so Mr. Bush can fight what Mr. Hastings calls a 'khaki
> election' next year. In that case, our political system has become
> utterly, and perhaps irrevocably, corrupted."
>SOURCE: New York Times, June 3, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054612800
>
>3. AMERICA'S MATRIX
>http://www.consortiumnews.com/Print/060103a.html
> In a wide-ranging critique of the Matrix-like "false reality" that
> Americans experience through their TV screens, journalist Bob Parry
> examines the CIA's recent report on mobile laboratories that it
> claims were designed to produce biological weapons. "The report
> reads like one more example of selective intelligence, which spurns
> plausible alternatives if they don't fit Bush's political needs,"
> Parry states. "Captured scientists said the labs were used to
> produce hydrogen for artillery weather balloons. In the CIA-DIA
> report, U.S. analysts agreed that hydrogen production was a
> plausible explanation for the labs." Moreover, "U.S. intelligence
> analysts found no evidence that these labs had been used to make
> biological weapons or that the two labs alone could produce
> weaponized BW agents. But that was obviously the wrong answer. ...
> So the CIA-DIA analysis veered off into an argumentative direction.
> The report asserted that the labs would be 'inefficient' for
> producing hydrogen" and "concluded that hydrogen production must be
> a 'cover story.'"
>SOURCE: Consortium News, June 2, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2003.html#1054526405
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054526405
>
>4. PR FIRM GETS 'PUBLIC INTEREST' GROUPS FRONTING FOR INDUSTRY
>http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/06_02_03_pressrelease.html
> "[T]he Gray Panthers, a public interest group that defends the
> rights of senior citizens, took out full page ads in newspapers
> around the country calling on federal officials to stop awarding
> federal contracts to MCI WorldCom -- which committed one of the
> largest corporate frauds in history. ... At the bottom of the ads,
> in small type, is this: 'This ad was paid for by Gray Panthers.' In
> fact, the $200,000 spent by the Gray Panthers to place the
> newspaper ads was raised by Issue Dynamics Inc., a Washington,
> D.C.-based [PR] consulting firm that represents the Baby Bells in
> their fight against WorldCom and that specializes in 'bridging gaps
> between industry and consumer groups on public policy issues.' ...
> Over the past couple of years, Issue Dynamics played a pivotal role
> in turning the National Consumers League from a consumer group into
> a corporate front group. And last year, Sam Simon, Issue Dynamics'
> founder and president, was named chairman of the board of the
> National Consumers League ."
>SOURCE: Corporate Crime Reporter, June 2, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2003.html#1054526404
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054526404
>
>5. EFFORTS TO CONTAIN MAD COW DISEASE FALL SHORT
>http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2003-06-02-edit_x.htm
> In 1997 Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber wrote Mad Cow USA, warning
> that that mad cow type diseases were possible in the U.S. Even now,
> in the face of North America's first case of mad cow disease in
> Canada, the powerful livestock industry and their friends in
> government are refusing to adopt the strict British standards
> regarding animal feeding and testing. USA Today editorializes that
> "Lax federal regulation and enforcement have left the U.S. beef
> supply and consumers' health unnecessarily vulnerable to an
> outbreak of mad cow... . ... The 1997 partial ban does not include
> cattle blood, which is fed to calves as a replacement for milk. ...
> A total ban on animal additives in animal feed would greatly reduce
> remaining risks. ... But the cattle industry and the FDA argue that
> a ban on animal products in feed is unnecessary because adequate
> safeguards against mad cow already are in place. ... That argument
> hides the industry's economic incentive to keep low-cost sources of
> animal protein in the diets of cattle."
>SOURCE: USA Today, June 2, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2003.html#1054526403
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054526403
>
>6. FCC RULING FUELS MOVEMENT FOR MEDIA DEMOCRACY
>http://www.mediareform.net/conference.php
> John Nichols writes in the Nation on-line that today's "3-2 vote by
> the Federal Communications Commission to remove barriers to
> corporate consolidation of control over the media capped a process
> that ... bent the rules to serve the special interests. ... In
> addition to provoking passionate opposition ... this spring's
> debate over the six sweeping changes in media ownership regulations
> drew more scrutiny of the FCC than had ever before been seen. And
> that attention has revealed an agency where corporations that are
> supposed to be regulated enjoy extraordinary access to the
> regulators and the favorable treatment that extends from that
> access." Nichols is one of many journalists, critics, public
> interest activists and public officials participating in the first
> National Conference on Media Reform this November 7-9 in Madison,
> Wisconsin, geared to building a political movement to democratize
> American media.
>SOURCE: The Nation online, June 2, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2003.html#1054526402
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054526402
>
>7. SHOW ME THE WEAPONS
>http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=RJ53EER4TABMYCRBAELCFEY?type=politicsNews&storyID=2865622
> Lawmakers in both the House and Senate are asking the White House
> for more information behind its charges that Iraq had weapons of
> mass destruction. Reuters reports, "Senate Armed Services Committee
> Chairman John Warner, a Virginia Republican, said his panel would
> hold hearings on the issue, possibly along with the Senate
> Intelligence Committee, because 'the situation is becoming one
> where the credibility of the administration and Congress is being
> challenged.' Rep. Henry Waxman of California, top Democrat on the
> House of Representatives Government Reform Committee, called on
> President Bush to explain why the administration repeatedly cited
> dubious and later discredited documents to back a claim that Iraq
> may have been pursuing nuclear weapons."
>SOURCE: Reuters, June 2, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2003.html#1054526401
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054526401
>
>8. HYPING THE HECK OUT OF NANOTECH, THE NEXT BIOTECH
> "Nanotech joins biotech among those promising technologies that
> hold the potential to change our world radically," Citigate
> Cunningham vice president Bill Bennett told PR trade publication
> The Holmes Report. Many in the PR industry are looking to
> nanotechology as the next big thing. "Such potential will never be
> without controversy, and already there are pockets of 'gray goo'
> paranoia springing up. The key here is to show the marketplace that
> the risks are no different than those attending the advent of the
> ATM," Bennett said. While the PR marketers paid to over-hype
> biotech are preparing to do the same for nanotechnology, public
> interest activists led by ETC Group are raising serious
> precautionary concerns about the downside of the rapidly developing
> new technology.
>SOURCE: The Holmes Report, June 2, 2003
>Web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2003.html#1054526400
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054526400
>
>9. SPUN DOCTORS
>http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/7400/1205
> "Few doctors have heard of the world's leading medical public
> relations companies - Edelman, Ruder Finn, Noonan/Russo Presence,
> the Shire Health Group, and Medical Action Communications, among
> others," write Bob Burton and Andy Rowell in the British Medical
> Journal. "Yet barely a day passes without most doctors or their
> patients being exposed to messages that have been carefully crafted
> by these public relations companies, aimed at boosting sales of
> their clients' drugs." Several other articles in the same issue of
> the BMJ examine the ethical conflicts of interest involved in drug
> company PR and the crisis of confidence they have helped create for
> the health care industry.
>SOURCE: British Medical Journal, May 31, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/May_2003.html#1054353600
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054353600
>
>10. FEEDING THE RAGE
>http://www.Journalismjobs.com/matt_labash.cfm
> In a candid interview about being a conservative reporter, Weekly
> Standard senior writer Matt Labash explained to JournalismJobs.com
> why conservative media has become so popular. "Because they feed
> the rage," Labash said. "We bring the pain to the liberal media. I
> say that mockingly, but it's true somewhat. We come with a strong
> point of view and people like point of view journalism. While all
> these hand-wringing Freedom Forum types talk about objectivity, the
> conservative media likes to rap the liberal media on the knuckles
> for not being objective. We've created this cottage industry in
> which it pays to be un-objective. ... Criticize other people for
> not being objective. Be as subjective as you want. It's a great
> little racket." Former executive editor of George Magazine Richard
> Blow commented on the interview, "I suspect that liberals would
> rather calm angry passions than incite them, that they seek harmony
> rather than promote division, and as earnest as that may sound, I
> still think it's better."
>SOURCE: Journalismjobs.com, May 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/May_2003.html#1054337268
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054337268
>
>11. WAR ON IRAQ READS LIKE ONE BIG 'WAG THE DOG' TALE
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/30/opinion/30KRUG.html?ex=1055601598&ei=1&en=cda94af2aafc8235
> Columnist Paul Krugman compares the war on Iraq to the 1997 movie
> Wag the Dog, saying that "if you don't think it bears a resemblance
> to recent events, you're in denial" because "much of the supposed
> justification for the war turns out to have been fictional. The war
> was justified to the public by links between Saddam and Al Qaeda,
> and Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction. No evidence
> of the Qaeda link has ever surfaced, and no W.M.D.'s that could
> have posed any threat to the U.S. or its allies have been found.
> ... Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary, recently told
> Vanity Fair that the decision to emphasize W.M.D.'s had been taken
> for 'bureaucratic reasons . . . because it was the one reason
> everyone could agree on.' ... For the time being, the public
> doesn't seem to care - or even want to know. A new poll by the
> Program on International Policy Attitudes finds that 41 percent of
> Americans either believe that W.M.D.'s have been found, or aren't
> sure."
>SOURCE: May 30, 2003, New York Times
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054267201
>
>12. SAVE OUR SPOOKS
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/30/opinion/30KRIS.html?pagewanted=print
> "The American people were manipulated" about alleged Iraqi weapons
> of mass destruction, says a member of the Defense Intelligence
> Agency. Several U.S. intelligence officers who are angry about the
> politicized distortion of their work and have formed a group called
> Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity. "While there have
> been occasions in the past when intelligence has been deliberately
> warped for political purposes," they stated in an open letter to
> President Bush, "never before has such warping been used in such a
> systematic way to mislead our elected representatives into voting
> to authorize launching a war."
>SOURCE: New York Times, May 30, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/May_2003.html#1054267200
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054267200
>
>13. FCC FAVORS INDUSTRY OVER CONSUMERS
>http://www.public-i.org
> "The nation's top broadcasters have met behind closed doors with
> Federal Communications Commission officials more than 70 times to
> discuss a sweeping set of proposals to relax media ownership
> rules," the Center for Public Integrity writes. "The private
> sessions included dozens of meetings between broadcasters and the
> agency's five commissioners and their top advisors. A June 2 vote
> is scheduled on the controversial proposals, which critics fear
> will touch off a major new round of media consolidation. In
> contrast, FCC officials held five private sessions with Consumers
> Union and the Media Access Project, the two major consumer groups
> working on the issue, since the proposals first surfaced eight
> months ago."
>SOURCE: Center for Public Integrity, May 29, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054180801
>
>14. THE UNSEEN WAR
>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/16293
> "Before arriving in Doha, I had spent hours watching CNN back home,
> and I was sadly reminded of the network's steady decline in recent
> years," writes Michael Massing. "Paula Zahn looked and talked like
> a cheerleader for the US forces; Aaron Brown kept reaching for the
> profound remark without ever finding it; Wolf Blitzer politely
> interviewed Washington's high and mighty, seldom asking a pointed
> question. None of them, however, appeared on the broadcasts I saw
> in Doha. CNN International bore more resemblance to the BBC than to
> its domestic edition - a difference that showed just how
> market-driven were the tone and content of the broadcasts. For the
> most part, US news organizations gave Americans the war they
> thought Americans wanted to see."
>SOURCE: New York Review of Books, May 29, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/May_2003.html#1054180800
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054180800
>
>15. STATUS REPORT ON IRAQ WAR MYTHS
>http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20030528.html
> In the wake of the war in Iraq, a number of questions have arisen
> about events during the war and Iraq's alleged possession of
> weapons of mass destruction and ties to Al Qaeda. Brendan Nyhan and
> Bryan Keefer sift through the evidence to date and attempt to
> separate spin from reality regarding events including the looting
> of Iraq's National Museum and the capture and rescue of Private
> Jessica Lynch.
>SOURCE: Spinsanity, May 28, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054094402
>
>16. FORMER HILL & KNOWLTON CHAIR CALLS PR 'A GAME'
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/28/nyregion/28PSYC.html?pagewanted=print&position=
> "Public relations was a game," former Hill & Knowlton chair Dick
> Cheney (no relation to the vice president) told the New York Times'
> Geraldine Fabrikant. "It was a fun game, but it was really just a
> game," said Cheney, who left PR to become a psychoanalyst. Cheney
> worked for H&K, one of the world's largest PR firms, on business
> takeovers between 1960 and 1993. Comments on the O'Dwyer's PR Daily
> website take issue with Cheney's career move. "Cheney helps one
> person at a time but a good PR writer helps millions," Ron Levy
> writes. "PR person with health accounts can lead patients to
> knowledge of drugs that help the mind and the body. ... Cheney
> charges people for his advice but PR brings the public advice FREE
> from the world's leading experts ... --experts who become
> increasingly expert at their specialties while Cheney spent time at
> what he now calls a game."
>SOURCE: New York Times, May 28, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/May_2003.html#1054094401
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054094401
>
>17. HRT MAKER'S PR ACTIVITIES RAISE CONCERN
>http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/28/1053801419770.html
> The Sydney Morning Herald reports that a booklet put out by the
> Australasian Menopause Society that "suggested [hormone replacement
> therapy] could prevent heart disease, Alzheimer's and ageing skin,
> yet ... failed to mention the established side-effect of blood
> clots, or the accumulating evidence that the drugs were causing
> heart disease" was drafted by HRT manufacturer, Wyeth, and its PR
> firm, Hill & Knowlton. HRT's revenues for Wyeth are $3 billion a
> year. With the release of a major study that reports a particular
> combination of hormones are twice as likely to lead to dementia for
> older women, the Herald writes, "there is more concern about
> Wyeth's behind-the-scenes activities. Scientists who conducted the
> dementia study are concerned that the company secretly briefed
> selected medical societies long before today's JAMA paper was out,
> in order to allow those societies plenty of time to prepare
> positions for the PR battle that is certain to erupt."
>SOURCE: Sydney Morning Herald, May 28, 2003
>More web links related to this story are available at:
> http://www.prwatch.org/spin/May_2003.html#1054094400
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054094400
>
>18. SPINNING GLOBAL CAPITALISM
>http://www.redpepper.org.uk/May2003/x-GlobalPR.html
> "[I]n a way the term public relations is misleading, because the
> vast majority of PR is hidden from the public," David Miller writes
> in the British magazine Red Pepper. "PR is much more important than
> just media spin. It is the very lifeblood of the global capitalist
> system. PR can only flourish as a profession and an industry in a
> society run on market principles. The further a society moves away
> from neo-liberal dogma the less role there is for the PR industry
> and vice versa."
>SOURCE: Red Pepper, May 27, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054008002
>
>19. TRUST IN MEDIA KEEPS SLIPPING
>http://www.usatoday.com/life/2003-05-27-media-trust_x.htm
> "Public confidence in the media, already low, continues to dip,"
> reports Peter Johnson. In a recent survey, only 36 percent of
> respondents, among the lowest in years, believe news organizations
> get the facts straight.
>SOURCE: USA Today, May 27, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1054008001
>
>20. MIDDLE EAST TV TO TAKE CUES FROM AMERICAN CABLE NEWS
>http://www.prweek.com/news/news_story.cfm?ID=180835&site=3
> The White House is dedicating $60 million to the proposed Middle
> East TV Network. The Broadcasting Board of Governors, a federal
> agency, will oversee the network, which will be headed by former
> CNN Washington bureau chief William Headline. "The BBG is currently
> doing market research in several Muslim countries that will
> determine the network's programming," PR Week writes. "Government
> officials are insisting that the network's purpose is not to
> influence Muslims with US propaganda, but to bring independent
> journalism into a region more accustomed to government-controlled
> press. 'The network would present objective news and information in
> a format similar to an American cable news network,' read a BBG
> statement."
>SOURCE: PR Week, May 26, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1053921602
>
>21. "WAL-MARTIZING" THE MEDIA
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40440-2003May26.html
> "Critics say the chance of hearing unique and offbeat voices in
> broadcasting could drop dramatically even as the number of outlets
> proliferates when the Federal Communications Commission votes on
> media ownership rules in about a week," reports Reshma Kapadia.
> "Like the Wal-Mart supercenters that have crowded out the
> mom-and-pop stores on Main Street and changed the U.S. retail
> landscape, the five major media owners could tighten their grip on
> programming, squeezing out local and independent views."
>SOURCE: Reuters, May 26, 2003
>To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:
> http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1053921601
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at PR Watch.
>To subscribe or unsubcribe, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found at the
>Spin of the Day" section of the PR Watch website:
>http://www.prwatch.org/spin/index.html
>
>Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at:
>http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues
>
>PR Watch, Spin of the Day and the Weekly Spin are projects
>of the Center for Media & Democracy, a nonprofit organization
>that offers investigative reporting on the public relations
>industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and
>misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of
>secretive, little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that
>work to control political debates and public opinion.
>Please send any questions or suggestions about our
>publications to:
>(editor /at/ prwatch.org)
>
>Contributions to the Center for Media & Democracy
>are tax-deductible. Send checks to:
> CMD
> 520 University Ave. #310
> Madison, WI 53703
>
>To donate now online, visit:
>https://www.egrants.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2344-0|1118-0
>_______________________________________________
>Weekly-Spin mailing list
>(Weekly-Spin /at/ prwatch.org)
>http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/weekly-spin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carpentier Nico (Phd)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Free University Brussels
Studies on Media, Information & Telecommunication (SMIT)
Centre for Media Sociology (CeMeSO)
Office: C0.05
Pleinlaan 2 - B-1050 Brussels - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-629.18.30
F: ++ 32 (0)2-629.28.61
E-mail: (Nico.Carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
W1: http://smit.vub.ac.be/
W2: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
ECCR-Mailing list
---
To unsubscribe, send an email message to (majordomo /at/ listserv.vub.ac.be)
with in the body of the message (NOT in the subject): unsubscribe eccr
---
ECCR - European Consortium for Communications Research
Secretariat: P.O. Box 106, B-1210 Brussels 21, Belgium
Tel.: +32-2-412 42 78/47
Fax.: +32-2-412 42 00
Email: (freenet002 /at/ pi.be) or (Rico.Lie /at/ pi.be)
URL: http://www.eccr.info
----------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
