[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[Commlist] New report on IPSO (Independent Press Standards Organisation)
Sat Jun 26 21:16:06 GMT 2021
You may be interested in a new report that we have just published on the
Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) which was set up as a
press regulator by some of the largest newspaper publishers following
the 2011/12 Leveson Inquiry.
The full report is available on this page:
https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/v4zx8/ipso-regulator-or-complaints-handler-how-uk-news-publishers-set-up-their-own-regulator-to-avoid-scrutiny
<https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/v4zx8/ipso-regulator-or-complaints-handler-how-uk-news-publishers-set-up-their-own-regulator-to-avoid-scrutiny>
A short 6 page summary report is available here:
https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/v4zx9/ipso-regulator-or-complaints-handler-summary
<https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/v4zx9/ipso-regulator-or-complaints-handler-summary>
The report is based on original documentary analysis, and reveals for
the first time how IPSO was set up largely as a predetermined industry
plan rather than as a response to the Leveson recommendations. It also
reveals how:
* a last-minute wording change to IPSO’s regulations by publishers
effectively removed its ability to launch a standards investigation
or impose sanctions, thereby reducing it to little more than a
complaints-handling body
* the industry has made it almost impossible for IPSO to gather
complete information on code breaches, and therefore to monitor
compliance with regulatory standards.
The report concludes that “IPSO’s hands have been tied by the industry,
and…. does not have the tools to fulfil the task of genuinely
independent and effective self-regulation.”
We argue that the consequences of this ineffectual regulation are
detrimental to the public who see injustices go unchallenged, and unfair
to the vast majority of working journalists who follow agreed
professional codes but see poor practices ignored. Crucially, deficient
regulation undermines trust in a vital democratic institution at a time
that professional newsgathering and accurate reporting are under huge
pressure from social media platforms.
We believe there are important policy implications for the forthcoming
Online Safety Bill which seeks to protect certain journalistic
privileges by reference to regulatory bodies that purport to act as
guarantors of professional journalistic standards.
There are a limited number of hard copies available of the full report
for those who think it may be a useful resource for their library (a
quaint and outmoded concept, I appreciate).
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]