[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[Commlist] Call for Papers: Edited Collection: Researching Horror Fans and Audiences in the Twenty-First Century
Thu Jul 07 15:18:15 GMT 2022
*Edited by: James Rendell and Kate Egan*
**
*Submission**deadline: 31^st July 2022.*
If ‘[w]e… want to think about horror as an umbrella term encompassing
several different sub-categories’ (Cherry 2009: 3), frequently clustered
as ‘cycles’ located on particular media at specific times and places
(Mittell 2004: 8; Hutchings 2004: 15-16), then horror fans are even more
nebula. From the individual illegally downloading rare banned cinema
from other parts of the world to the parents taking their children to a
kid-friendly /Stranger Things /Secret Cinema matinee event, horror
fandom is a leviathan that is both shapeshifting and hydra-headed. There
are those who love certain monsters, subgenres, and creatives, whilst
others enjoy the genre via specific media such as novels, theatre,
cinema, TV, and video games. Equally, the types of affective pleasure
that come from consuming horror media are myriad: the thrills of being
scared (Barker et al. 2016), to the emotional bond formed with
characters (Rendell 2019), to valuing subcultural knowledge-over-effect
(Hills 2005). Likewise, intersectional make-up such as gender, race,
sexuality, and nationality inform audience responses to horror media and
shape fan identity (e.g. Johnson 2015; Morales**2021). Conversely,
horror fandom is often married with anti-fandom reacting to perceived
misuses of the genre, such as cult fans’ disdain for Hollywood teen
Gothic blockbusters, viewers who prefer aesthetic restraint over the
shock and gore of depicted corporeal trauma, and those who find issues
with onscreen representations or lack thereof. Moreover, the variety of
fan practices further complicates horror fandoms as participatory
cultures, oscillating between the textual and tactile, between the
offline and online, and between affirmational and transformative works.
We might also note that whilst devotees invest time, energy, and
finances into consuming an array of genre paratexts (e.g. Sexton 2015),
there are also audiences who casually or infrequently enjoy horror (e.g.
Church 2021). Yet, despite the continual study of horror media, the
industries producing it, and the cultures or nations from which it
arises, comparatively the examination of horror fans have been left
somewhat in the shadows (Hills**2014: 90; Barker et al. 2016: 66-67).
Addressing this shortcoming, this edited collection seeks a diverse
range of chapters on horror audiences, fans, and anti-fans. Topics could
include (but are not limited to):
* Horror fans and affect
* Identity and horror fandom
* Horror fandom of specific texts, monsters, subgenres, creatives, or
media
* Life cycles of horror fandom
* Transmedia and horror audiences
* Horror fans collecting, paratexts, and merchandise
* Controversy surrounding horror audiences and intra-fandom conflict
* Horror anti-fandom
* Horror fandoms’ online cultures and digital media
* Transformative horror fan works
* Haptic fan experiences and tactile fan crafts
* Horror fandom and the body – cosplay, clothing, tattoos
* National, transcultural, and global horror fandom
* Lay audiences and causal fandom
* Genre nostalgia, memories of horrors past, and audiences’
experiences of horror media
* Horror fans and public events – conventions, festivals, themed
events, and experiential cinema**
Please submit abstracts (maximum 350 words) and bios (maximum 150
words), or any questions you have, to James Rendell
((james.rendell /at/ southwales.ac.uk) <mailto:(james.rendell /at/ southwales.ac.uk)>)
and Kate Egan ((kate.egan /at/ northumbria.ac.uk)
<mailto:(kate.egan /at/ northumbria.ac.uk)>). There is an intention to submit
the collection for the 21st Century Horror series at EUP who have
expressed initial interest. *Submission* *deadline: 31^st July 2022.*
//
*/Work Cited/*
Barker, M., Egan, K., Phillips, T. and Ralph, S. 2016. /Alien Audiences:
Remembering and Evaluating a Classic Movie/. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Cherry, B. 2009. /Horror/. London: Routledge.
Church, D. 2021. /Post-Horror: Art, Genre, and Cultural Elevation/.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hills, M. 2005. /The Pleasures of Horror/. London: Continuum.*__*
Hills, M. 2014. ‘Horror Reception/Audiences.’ In Benshoff, H.M. (ed). /A
Companion to the Horror Film/. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. pp:90-108
Hutchings, P. 2004. /The Horror Film. /Harlow://Pearson Longman.*__*
Johnson, D. D. 2015. ‘Misogynoir and Antiblack Racism: What /The Walking
Dead/ Teaches us About the Limits of Speculative Fiction Fandom.’
/Journal of Fandom Studies/. 3(3). pp:259-275
Mittell, J. 2004. /Genre and Television: From Cop Shows to Cartoons in
American Culture/. New York: Routledge.*__*
Morales, O. 2021. ‘The Visceral in Latinx Horror’. /Flow/ [online].
27^th April. Available at:
http://www.flowjournal.org/2021/04/visceral-in-latinx-horror/
<http://www.flowjournal.org/2021/04/visceral-in-latinx-horror/>
Rendell, J. 2019. A picture is worth a thousand corpses: Audiences’
affective engagement with /In the Flesh/ and /The Walking Dead/ through
online image practices. /Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception
Studies/. 16(2). pp.88-117
Sexton, J. 2015. Creeping Decay: Cult Soundtracks, Residual Media, and
Digital Technologies. /New Review of Film and Television Studies/.
13(1). pp:12-30
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ commlist.org)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]