[Commlist] cfp: International Colloquium: The Grip of Communication

*Call for papers (PDF version available here 
<https://www.academia.edu/73966443/International_Colloquium_The_Grip_of_Communication_December_15_16_2022_Sciences_Po_Toulouse_France_>)*
*
*

*The grip of “communication”*

*International Colloquium organized on the occasion*

*of the 10^th  anniversary of the French academic journal*

*/Politiques/**/de Communication/*

*At Sciences Po Toulouse, Manufacture des Tabacs, 21 allée de Brienne, 
31000 Toulouse - France*

*****

·Dates: December 15-16, 2022

·Submission of proposals (abstract): June 15, 2022

·Response and selection: July 15, 2022.

·Final submission of papers (7,500 words max.): November 15, 2022

*****


For its tenth anniversary, the French academic journal /Politiques 
de/<https://www.cairn.info/revue-politiques-de-communication.htm>/communication 
/is//organizing an international colloquium whose ambition is to propose 
an overall reflection on "the grip of communication" in the structuring 
of contemporary social spaces.

The term "communication" is polysemic: depending on the context of use, 
it designates interpersonal relations, data, broadcast media, 
infrastructures, economic sectors, professional groups, organizational 
policies, or even new ways of acting on and thinking about the social 
world. “The grip of communication” can therefore be defined, in a first 
approximation, as the partial transformation of relatively autonomous 
social activities due to the generalization of the use of mass media and 
digital media, and the standardization of the knowledge, know-how and 
professional or profane beliefs associated with them.

As various studies have shown, it can be detected in the transformations 
of organizations, public and private, commercial or not, in a mutation 
in the forms of expression, or in the evolution of the resources and 
skills necessary to succeed socially, and therefore of the hierarchies, 
cleavages and forms of legitimate socialization and sociability. For 
about two decades, this unequal grip of communication has manifested 
itself in an exemplary way in the digitalization of social relations: 
commercial, professional, non-profit, militant, but also friendly or 
amorous. It is also reflected in the growing weight of communication 
professionals in sectors and professions where they were historically 
absent: gastronomy, sports, justice, science, university, publishing, etc.

The ambition of this colloquium is to bring together and bring into 
dialogue empirical studies aiming to measure the forms and the strength 
of this grip of communication in various social fields: politics or 
economic activities, of course, but also culture, journalism, teaching 
and research, sport, fashion, law, religion, food, clothing and even 
ways of being and living in society.

The "grip of communication" is not a new question for social science 
research. Its ideological, political, economic, technical and 
organizational dimensions have been explored. In a cumulative 
perspective, the first ambition of this colloquium is to propose an 
assessment of the works on the evolution of social practices and 
representations of communication and their organizational implications. 
It also proposes to question the social relations of domination - of 
gender, class, "race", generation - of which communication is a tool and 
sometimes a revealer. In what proportions and according to what variable 
modalities is this "grip" of communication exercised (or felt), 
according to the specific logics of a given social space? Is the 
professionalization of communication a form of rationalization of the 
work of legitimization or of symbolic domination? Does the extension of 
the practices of communication take part of a growing subordination to 
economic and political interests? Is it a resource monopolized by a few 
institutions or people with better resources? On the contrary, is it 
also observed - and with what ambivalences - in the militant, scientific 
or artistic practices of contestation of the social order?

The need to capitalize on the numerous contributions of the social 
sciences is in line with the desire of the journal /Politiques de 
communication/ to open up new avenues for research. These new ways are 
established by the exploration of objects having escaped until now the 
investigations of the research, but they can also be drawn in the course 
of a renewed work of problematization and distancing that highlight the 
induced effects of communication in social universes already well studied.

Researchers from different social science disciplines are invited to 
participate in this collective critical enterprise. The expected 
proposals should, on the one hand, present an explicit construction of 
the object around this "grip of communication", and on the other hand, 
mobilize and rely on rigorously constructed empirical data in order to 
avoid the risk of speculative denunciation.

The expected communications can be inscribed in one of the three 
following axes:

*1)**The “professionalization” of communication and its effects*

In this first axis, the expected contributions will try to show how 
agents who seek to legitimize communication skills and know-how are 
gradually imposing themselves in sectors that until now had escaped 
them, affecting at the same time the logics of functioning and sometimes 
even the hierarchies of the spaces in which they evolve.

In an analysis centered on the study of the processes of construction of 
the professional groups, it is first a question of studying the 
emergence, in sectors of activities from which they were excluded until 
now, of agents specialized in communication. How is the profession of 
communicator invented in the artistic, gastronomic or associative 
sectors, for example? By what type of agents are these activities 
carried out and how are new skills and competences imposed in these 
sectors? How is the recognition of these specialties organized through 
the action of professional groups, associations, unions or schools? In 
sectors where professional groups are in the process of being 
institutionalized - such as politics or sports - it will be possible to 
understand how spaces are reconfigured and how new professional norms 
are imposed.

We will then look at the emergence and construction of new professions 
which, based on digital technologies, offer new professional 
opportunities to agents. How are the jobs of influencers, streamers, 
gamers, community managers, etc. being invented today? What are the 
conditions that allow people to make a living from these activities? 
What are the trajectories of those who invest in these new spaces? How 
does professional socialization take place in these sectors? How are the 
norms of the profession progressively constructed and organized?

Finally, it will be a question of understanding what the emergence of 
these professional groups does to the sectors of activity in which they 
have invested. How does the arrival of communicators transform the world 
of publishing or gastronomy?  What are social networks doing to 
politics? How are beauty influencers transforming gender norms? It is 
therefore the grip of communicators on certain fields and sectors of 
activity that will be studied here and their effects on the fields in 
question. In what way does the presence of these agents transform or not 
these sectors of activity and the social hierarchies that govern them? 
What about the effects of their symbolic action on social relations of 
domination?

*2)**Information under the grip of communication*

A second line of questioning deals with the current forms of the grip of 
communication on the production of journalistic information. If the 
professionalization of sources and their influence on the co-production 
of journalistic information, the modalities of information dissemination 
and the representations of the public associated with them, or even the 
sources of media consecration are classic problems since the 1990s and 
2000s, there is a lack of recent empirical work that updates knowledge 
and makes the contemporary forms of these fundamental issues 
intelligible. The answers to the questions raised here will be attentive 
to the characteristics of press institutions and their editorial 
offices, to the distribution of resources and competencies, and to the 
issues of competition in and around the journalistic field.

The contributions can first of all question the modalities of the 
professionalization of information sources and its effects on the 
information produced. Has it become more pronounced? Is it based on new 
knowledge and communication practices, especially with the use of 
social-digital networks? It seems impossible today for a minister, an 
artist or even a scientist to exist publicly without maintaining a 
Twitter account, just as it seems unthinkable for political, cultural or 
scientific journalists not to scrutinize this social network for news. 
Have new sources of information, previously neglected or in the 
minority, acquired a new influence thanks to new communication 
practices? Has the professionalization of sources also developed in 
social sectors - and journalistic specialties - where it was marginal 
(sports information, cultural information, etc.)? Has the development of 
digital technology, and in particular social networks or online videos, 
offered new resources to journalists, allowing them to distance 
themselves more critically from traditional information sources?

The contributions can also take as their object the transformations of 
the modes of diffusion of journalistic information, thanks to the new 
means of communication (websites, smartphones, social networks) and the 
development of "transmedia", and their effects in return on the 
representations of the public and the production of the information. 
What new formats do these means of communication offer, and how are they 
appropriated by journalists? Does the intensification of the measurement 
of Internet users' online behavior increase the influence of marketing 
considerations already identified in the production of information in 
the 1980s? Has the generalization of the use of digital media made 
possible the emergence or the diffusion of "alternative" 
(non-journalistic) forms of information? How is determined the 
credibility and authority of the information thus disseminated?

The contributions can finally question the current forms of media 
consecration. If the processes of accumulation and monetization of media 
capital are beginning to be well known, there are still few works that 
articulate the analysis of the notoriety acquired by the journalistic 
field, and that gained by other means of communication, notably digital 
networks. Under what conditions and for which social agents does the 
latter allow to compensate or increase the former?

*3)** “The grip of communication” as a public problem and a problem of 
the public*

A third axis will focus on the grip of communication, and in particular 
of digitalization, on the "public" in the broadest sense, whether it is 
a question of the reproduction and/or transformation of ordinary social 
relations (receptions, appropriations and uses of the media), on the one 
hand, and of the arenas of construction of public problems 
(claims-making activities), on the other.

One of the effects of the rise of "communication" is the trivialization 
of strategies of self-presentation in the most ordinary interactions, 
such as self-branding on social media or the renewal of profane 
practices of production and circulation of information. If these aspects 
have been widely studied for the last twenty years, few works have tried 
to analyze the social conditions of possibility of these activities, 
their costs and benefits of appropriation - economic and symbolic - 
according to the social properties of the agents who invest in them. 
What assessment can be made of the existing research concerning the hold 
of communication on the receivers, the users, the publics of the media, 
according to the positioning of the agents in social space, of the 
capitals they have, and of the unequal distribution of the material and 
cognitive instruments necessary for the incorporation of the most 
legitimate information and communication practices? What benefits of 
conformity or distinction are agents likely to derive from their 
behaviors and attitudes towards digital media and tools within the 
family circle, peer groups, their professional worlds, their political 
and religious commitments, or their leisure practices? Is digital media 
a recognized and active resource, and if so, for whom and under what 
conditions?

A second aspect of this axis concerns the place and the role of the grip 
of communication in the construction of public problems. We observe, on 
the one hand, a transformation of the processes of publicization and 
politicization of social problems in favor of the multiplication of 
communication channels and the diversification of the arenas of public 
debate. This observation, commonplace, of a rise in the carrying 
capacity of social problems can raise questions that are less so, if we 
reason with the tools of the sociology of public problems: what are the 
effects of this modification of the channels and spaces of expression on 
the principles of selection of the issues? How does the influence of 
communication on the processes of setting the agenda of problems work? 
Can we observe an intensification of the competition between public 
problem entrepreneurs, while the struggles for the attention of the 
public are subject to very sophisticated rationalization strategies? To 
what extent do these transformations contribute to making "communication 
problems" and their "solutions" into political ready-to-think?

The grip of communication is manifested, on the other hand, by the fact 
that it constitutes itself as a public meta-problem, that is to say a 
category subsuming other problems regularly put on the media and 
political agenda, whether it is a question of the criticism of the media 
and journalism, of commercial advertising, of political and public 
communication, or even of the criticism of digital media. How and by 
whom are the public problems of this all-encompassing problem of the 
"grip of communication" constructed and prioritized? Are they the object 
of a specific work of politicization or, on the contrary, of 
depoliticization and even their disappearance from the public agenda? 
Far from limiting ourselves to the analysis of critical discourses and 
"controversies" on these issues, the papers will pay attention to the 
concrete activities of claims-making in the arenas of public debate, but 
also to the power relations between claims-makers, according to their 
socio-professional positions and properties, to the social and 
institutional conditions of their positions and to the specificities, 
hierarchies and mutual relations between the social spaces of production 
and circulation of their discourses, be they local, national or 
international.

*****

Proposals for papers should be sent before June 15, 2022 to the 
following address: (colloque.emprise.communication /at/ gmail.com) 
<mailto:(colloque.emprise.communication /at/ gmail.com)>

Short (about 450 words), they should present their object of study, the 
theoretical framework, the problematic and the empirical elements. They 
will be careful to explain the critical dimension of the approach and 
indicate what they wish to show/demonstrate.

Papers can be submitted in French and English. No payment from the 
authors will be required.

The authors whose proposals are selected will participate in the 
colloquium and, at the same time, will submit a written version of their 
paper, which will be reviewed for publication in the anniversary issue 
of the journal. The proposals will be selected by the editorial board of 
the journal /Politiques de communication/.

The committee will make its decision by July 15, 2022. For the 
publication of a special anniversary issue of the journal, papers should 
be written in a format that corresponds to the journal's format and sent 
to the conference organizing team by November 15, 2022.

***Organizing Committee*

- Olivier BAISNEE

- Benjamin FERRON

- Sandrine LEVEQUE

- Jérémie NOLLET

*Scientific Council*

Anne-Claude AMBROISE-RENDU | Olivier BAISNEE | Christine BARATS | Rodney 
BENSON | Clémentine BERJAUD | Loïc BLONDIAUX | Julien BOYADJIAN | 
Isabelle CHARPENTIER | Ivan CHUPIN | Clément DESRUMAUX | Benjamin FERRON 
| Charles GADEA | Jean-Paul Géhin | Nicolas HUBE | Christian LE BART | 
Jean-Baptiste LEGAVRE | Brigitte LE GRIGNOU | Pierre LEROUX | Sandrine 
LEVEQUE | Erik NEVEU | Jérémie NOLLET | Caroline OLLIVIER-YANIV | 
Aurélie OLIVESI | Stéphane OLIVESI | Valentina PRICOPIE | Rémy RIEFFEL | 
Julie SEDEL | Jean-Claude SOULAGES| Anaïs THEVIOT | Sandra VERA ZAMBRANO**

***Bibliography*

/Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales,/ « L’emprise du journalisme 
», 101-102, 1994.

Aldrin, Philippe, Nicolas HUBE, Caroline Ollivier-Yaniv and Jean-Michel 
UTARD (eds.). 2014. /Les mondes de la communication publique. 
Légitimation et fabrique symbolique du politique/. Rennes : Presses 
Universitaires de Rennes, Res Publica.

Aldrin, Philippe and Nicolas Hubé. 2022. /Introduction à la 
communication politique/. Paris : De Boeck.

Alexandre, Olivier, Jean-Samuel Beuscart and  Sébastien Broca. 2022. Une 
sociohistoire des critiques numériques. /Réseaux/ 231(1): 9-37.

Aronczyk, Melissa and Maria I. Espinoza. 2022. /A Strategic Nature. 
Public Relations and the Politics of American Environmentalism/. Oxford: 
Oxford University Press.

Belair-Gagnon, Valerie, and Avery E. Holton. 2018. Boundary Work, 
Interloper Media, And Analytics In Newsrooms. An analysis of the roles 
of web analytics companies in news production. /Digital Journalism/ 6: 
492–508.

Bennet, Lance and Barbara Pfetsch. 2018. Rethinking Political 
Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres. /Journal of 
Communication/ 68(2): 243-253.

Benson, Rodney, and Erik Neveu. 2005. /Bourdieu and the Journalistic 
Field/. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Benson, Rodney, Mattias Hesserus and Julie Sedel. 2022. /How Press 
Ownership Matters/. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blumler Jay 2016. /The Fourth Age of Political Communication/. 
/Politiques de Communication/ 6.

Boyadjian Julien. 2016. /Analyser les opinions politiques sur Internet/. 
Paris : Dalloz.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. /On Television/. New York: The New Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2022. /Microcosmes. Théorie des champs/. Paris : 
Raisons d’agir.

Champagne, Patrick. 1990. /Faire l’opinion. Le nouveau jeu 
politique./ Paris: éditions de Minuit.

Charon, Jean and Jean de Bonville. 1996. Le paradigme du journalisme de 
communication : essai de définition. /Communication/ 17(2).

Christin, Angèle. 2020. /Metrics at Work: Journalism and the Contested 
Meaning of Algorithms/. Princeton: Princetown University Press.

Comby, Jean-Baptiste (ed.). 2017. /Enquêter sur l’internationalisation 
des biens médiatiques et culturels/. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de 
Rennes, Res Publica.

Davis, Aeron. 2002. /Public Relations Democracy. //Public Relations, 
Politics and the Mass Media in Britain/. Manchester : Manchester 
University Press.

Davis, Aeron. /Promotional Cultures. The Rise and Spread of Advertising, 
Public Relations, Marketing and Branding/. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Desrumaux, Clément and Jérémie Nollet (eds.). 2021. /Un capital 
médiatique ? Usages et légitimation de la médiatisation en politique/. 
Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, Res Publica.

Eldridge II, Scott A. 2018. /Online Journalism from the Periphery. 
Interloper Media and the journalistic Field/. London and New York: 
Routledge, Journalism/Media Studies.

Ferron, Benjamin, Claire Oger and Emilie Née. 2022. /Donner la parole 
aux « sans-voix » ? Construction sociale et mise en discours d’un 
problème public/. Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Res Publica.

Ferron, Benjamin, Jean-Baptiste Comby, Karim Souanef and Jérôme 
Berthaut. 2018. Réinscrire les études sur le journalisme dans une 
sociologie générale. /Biens Symboliques/Symbolic Goods/, 2.

François, Bastien and Erik Neveu (eds.). 1995. /Espaces publics 
mosaïques : acteurs, arènes et rhétoriques des débats publics 
contemporains/. Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Res Publica.

Frau, Caroline. 2014. Construire des manifestations de papier. L'action 
des buralistes face à la lutte contre le tabagisme. /Réseaux/ 187(5): 22-49.

Gamson, William. 1992. /Talking Politics/. Cambridge : Cambridge 
University Press.

Ghorbanzadeh Keyvan, « Le droit de cité publicitaire. Critiques et 
régulation d’un ‘espace public privé’ », /Politiques de communication/, 
14(1), 2020, p. 65-90.

Goulet, Vincent. 2014. /Médias et classes populaires. Les usages 
ordinaires des informations./ Paris: INA Editions, version poche.

Grossetête, Matthieu. 2011. Les classes sociales dans la communication 
publique. Les campagnes télévisuelles de prévention des accidents de la 
circulation (1999-2005). /Questions de communication/ 19(1): 269-290.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. /The Structural Transformation of the Public 
Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society/. Cambridge: MIT 
Press.

Juhem, Philippe and Julie Sedel (eds.). 2016. /Agir par la parole. 
Porte-paroles et asymétries de l’espace public/. Rennes: Presses 
universitaires de Rennes, Res Publica.

Kaid L. L. and C. Holtz-Bacha (eds.). 2007. /Encyclopedia of Political 
Communication/. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Maratea, Ray. 2008. The e-Rise and Fall of Social Problems: the 
Blogosphere as a Public Arena. /Social Problems/ 55(1): 139-160.

Marchetti, Dominique (dir.). 2008./ Communication et médiatisation de 
l’État. La politique invisible/. Saint-Martin d’Hère: Presses 
Universitaires de Grenoble.

Miège, Bernard. 1989, 1997, 2007. /La société conquise par la 
communication /(3 tomes). Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.

Naulin, Sidonie. 2017. /Des mots à la bouche : le journalisme 
gastronomique en France/. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, Res 
Publica.**

Negrine Ralph, Christina Holtz-Bacha, Paolo Mancini, Stylianos 
Papathanassopoulos (eds.). 2007. /The Professionalisation of Political 
Communication/. Chcago : University of Chicago Press

Neihouser, Marie. 2018. La reproduction 2.0. Les inégalités de position 
des journalistes blogueurs dans le champ journalistique. /Savoir/Agir 
/46(4): 51-57.

Neveu, Erik. 2020. /Une société de communication ?/ Paris: Montchrestien.

Neveu, Erik. 2015. /Sociologie politique des problèmes publics/. Paris: 
Armand Collin, coll. U Sociologie.

Olivesi, Stéphane. 2007. /La communication au travail. Une critique des 
nouvelles formes de pouvoir dans les entreprises/. Grenoble: Presses 
Universitaires de Grenoble.

Paillart, Isabelle (dir.). 1995. /L'espace public et l'emprise de la 
communication/. Paris: Ellug, 1995.

Perloff, Richard M. 2013. /The Dynamics of Political Communication. 
Media and Politics in a Digital Age/. London & New York: Routledge.

Pichonnaz, David. 2013. Communication policière et discours sur la 
déviance. Une expertise marquée par des enjeux professionnels et 
corporatistes. /Politiques de communication/ 1(1): 127-150.

Powers, Matthew and Adrienne Russel (eds.). 2020. /Rethinking Media 
Research for Changing Societies/. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Schudson Mickael. 1995. /The power of News/. Cambridge: Harvard 
University Press.

Sedel, Julie. 2013./ Les médias et la banlieue. /Lormont: INA/Bord de l’eau.

Sedel, Julie. 2021. /Dirigeants de médias. Sociologie d’un groupe 
patronal/. Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Res Publica.

Smith, Simon. 2017. /Discussing the News. The Uneasy Alliance of 
Participatory Journalists and the Critical Public/. London: Palgrave 
MacMillan.

Sobieraj, Sarah. 2011. /Soundbitten. The perils of media-centered 
political activism/. New York & London: New York University Press.

Tunstall, Jeremy. 2001. /Media Occupations and Professions: A Reader/. 
Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Winseck, Dwayne R. and Robert M. Pike. 2007. /Communication and Empire. 
Media, Markets and Globalization, 1860-1930/. Durham & London: Duke 
University Press.

*****

The journal /Politiques de communication/ aims to shed light on 
communication in its social and political dimensions. Its objective is 
to produce rigorous, methodologically supported knowledge, seeking to 
uncover the logics of communication. An analytical journal, it uses the 
social sciences in their diversity to explore “apparatus,” “fields,” 
“worlds,” and “configurations,” within which communication takes part in 
the rationalization of practices, in the peaceful exercise of power and 
its legitimation, in the changes in the relationships that individuals 
have with themselves and with social groups, and in the new forms of 
subjectivity that result from this.

/Politiques de communication/ pays particular attention to knowledge 
without grandeur, to neglected or marginal systems of representation and 
the image of the social groups that bear them, to commonplace empirical 
data, to professional practice; in short, to all sorts of subjects that 
have been left behind. It aims to study the phenomena of communication 
from a symbolic viewpoint in order to gain a better understanding of 
their anthropological and political implications. It also seeks to not 
separate scholarly discourse from non-expert discourse, in order to 
enrich the former with all sorts of empirical data and to thus recall 
that the smallest glimpse of truth is reliant on one condition . . . 
politics.

Working to free itself from the academic routine, which is an expression 
of the social division of scientific work, /Politiques de communication 
/intends to curb the influence of disciplinary rationales. It seeks to 
be a forum for mutual and fruitful exchange between researchers from 
France and the rest of the world, who, working on the same objectives 
but with different methodologies and theoretical frameworks, hope to 
come together and challenge each other in order to renew perceptions of 
the contemporary reality of communication.


      *Editorial Board*

_Editor-in-chief_
Stéphane Olivesi (Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, France)

_Editorial committee_

Olivier Baisnée (IEP de Toulouse), Clémentine Berjaud (U. Paris 1), 
Julie Bouchard (U. Paris 13), Julien Boyadjian (IEP de Lille), Isabelle 
Charpentier (U. de Picardie), Ivan Chupin (UP Saclay), Jean-Baptiste 
Comby (U. Paris 2), Clément Desrumaux (U. Lyon 2), Benjamin Ferron (U. 
Paris Est), Nicolas Hubé (U. de Lorraine), Nicolas Kaciaf (IEP de 
Lille), Pierre Leroux (UCO), Philippe Le Guern (U. de Rennes), Sandrine 
Lévêque (IEP de Lille), Clément Mabi (U.T. de Compiègne), Jérémie Nollet 
(IEP de Toulouse), Aurélie Olivesi (U. Lyon 1), Julie Sedel (U. de 
Strasbourg), Anaïs Théviot (UCO).

_Scientific committee_

Anne-Claude Ambroise-Rendu (UP Saclay), Christine Barats (U. Paris 5), 
Loïc Blondiaux (U. Paris 1), Eric Darras (IEP de Toulouse), Pascal 
Dauvin (UP Saclay), Charles Gadéa (U. de Nanterre), Jean-Paul Gehin (U. 
de Poitiers), Chistian Le Bart (IEP de Rennes), Jean-Baptiste Legavre 
(U. Paris 2), Brigitte Le Grignou (U. Paris Dauphine), Gérard Mauger 
(CESSP-CSE CNRS), Erik Neveu (IEP de Rennes), Caroline Ollivier-Yaniv 
(U. Paris Est), Yves Poirmeur (UP Saclay), Rémy Rieffel (U. Paris 2), 
Jean-Claude Soulages (U. Lyon 2).

_International committee___

Patrick Amey (U. de Genève), Stefanie Averbeck-Lietz (U. de Brême), 
Rodney Benson (U. de New York), Marcel J. Broersma (U. de Groningue), 
Aeron Davis (Goldsmiths College - Londres), Oliver Fahle (U. de la Ruhr, 
Bochum), Andreas Fickers (U. du Luxembourg), Fiorenza Gamba (U. de 
Sassari), Eric Georges (U. du Québec - Montréal), Oliver Hahn (U. de 
Passau – Bavière), François Heinderyckx (U. libre de Bruxelles), Sylvain 
Lefèvre (U. du Québec - Montréal), Nadine Machikou Ndzesop (U. Yaoundé 
II), Victor Manuel Marí Sáez (U. de Cadix), Liz Moor (Goldsmiths College 
- Londres), David Morley (Goldsmiths College - Londres), Spiros 
Moschonas (U. d’Athènes), Valentina Pricopie (U. Valahia de Târgoviste), 
Veneza Mayora Ronsini (U. of Santa Maria - Brésil), Klaus Schonbach (U. 
de Vienne), Roland Schroeder (U. d’Iserlohn - 
Rhénanie-du-Nord-Westphalie), Rui Torres (U. Fernando Pessoa - Porto), 
Jean Zaganiaris (EGE - Rabat).


---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------