[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[Commlist] Viral Masculinities online conference
Wed Jul 22 16:05:41 GMT 2020
Free registration is now open for the Viral Masculinities online
conference, which will take place between the 31 Aug and 11 Sep on Zoom.
*Keynote Speakers:*
- Professor John Mercer (Birmingham City University)
- Professor Susanna Paasonen (University of Turku)
- Professor Tim Dean (University of Illinois)
We’re living in viral times; ours is a time of contagion. As Tony
Sampson writes in his book Virality: Contagion Theory in the Age of
Networks, “the networked infrastructures of late capitalism are
interwoven with the universal logic of the epidemic” (Sampson 2011,
1–2). Deeply connected to contemporary biopolitics and modes of digital
sociability, virality also underpins news forms of wealth creation and
accumulation sustained by 21st-century media, whilst at the same time
(paradoxically, perhaps) presenting a political threat through the risk
it carries of “contagious overspills” that may undo borders, nation
states, institutions, ontologies and subjectivities (2). Defined by
Sampson as “contagious relationality” (3), in the age of memes, “fake
news,” hacking, epidemics, ecological crisis, global migration flows,
antiretroviral drugs, YouTube and Pornhub, virality is at the centre of
contemporary forms of both control and liberation (5–6). Whilst, on the
one hand, it sustains the logics of 21st-century biopolitics
(antiretrovirals, hygiene, cyber security, monitoring and surveillance
systems, etc.), on the other, it has the capacity to disrupt
subjectivities and social assemblages, a capacity that resides in its
ability to facilitate unforeseen flows of desire and affect (chemsex
parties organised through Grindr and facilitated by Uber, biohacking,
citizen journalism, Wikileaks, Anonymous, the “Arab Spring,” the “Yellow
Vest Movement,” etc.).
If our time is a game of push and pull fuelled on all sides by
contagious forms of relationality, what then for masculinities? If our
understandings of masculinity are “inherently relational” (Connell 2005,
68), what happens to them in a context of “contagious relationality”
(Sampson 2011, 3)? If “gender is a way in which social practice is
ordered” (Connell 2005, 71), what has been the impact on masculinities
of a social order both coded and disrupted through viral means?
To check the individual sessions and register to the ones you’d like to
attend, *please visit http://porousmasculinities.exeter.ac.uk/conference/.*
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]