[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[Commlist] New Book: Eric Rohmer’s Film Theory (1948-1953)
Fri Jan 04 13:43:55 GMT 2019
New Book: Eric Rohmer’s Film Theory (1948-1953)
Marco Grosoli, /Eric Rohmer’s Film Theory (1948-1953): from ‘Ecole
Schérer’ to ‘Politique des auteurs’/(Amsterdam: Amsterdam University
Press, 2018).
In the 1950s, a group of critics writing for /Cahiers du Cinéma/
launched one of the most successful and influential trends in the
history of film criticism: auteur theory. Though these days it is
usually viewed as limited and a bit old-fashioned, a closer inspection
of the hundreds of little-read articles by these critics reveals that
the movement rested upon a much more layered and intriguing aesthetics
of cinema. This book is a first step toward a serious reassessment of
the mostly unspoken theoretical and aesthetic premises underlying auteur
theory, built around a reconstruction of Eric Rohmer's early but
decisive leadership of the group, whereby he laid down the foundations
for the eventual emergence of their full-fledged auteurism.
/Eric Rohmer’s Film Theory/sets out to show that the initial spark that
ignited the 'politique des auteurs' was Rohmer's rejection of Sartre's
philosophy and aesthetics in favor of Kant's and other "traditional" (as
in: pre-20th century) philosophical perspectives. Essentially, the book
describes and elaborates upon the brewing of 'politique des auteurs''s
philosophical premises (as a result of Rohmer's aforementioned shift
away from Sartre) between 1948-1953, i.e. before the actual 'politique
des auteurs' emerged as such.
A second volume will then cover the actual ‘politique des auteurs’
years, between 1954 and 1959. This follow-up is currently being drafted,
and will attempt to outline what the “young Turks”’ auteur theory was
really about.
https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789462985803/eric-rohmer-s-film-theory-1948-1953
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
1. A Novelistic Art of Space
1.1. Sartre’s ontology
1.2. A novelistic ontology?
1.3. Cinema: Novelistic consciousness qua actual nothingness
1.4. An art of space
1.5. An art of appearance for appearance’s sake
1.6. Space vs. language
1.7. An art more novelistic than the novel itself
2. Alexandre Astruc: An Early but Decisive Influence
2.1. Kant’s transcendental aesthetics – and Heidegger’s reinterpretation
2.2. ‘Dialectique et cinéma’
2.3. From and beyond Sartre’s Heideggerian perspective
2.4. The ‘Camera-Stylo’
3. Under and On the Volcano: Rohmer’s Conversion
3.1. The Other
3.2. The triumph of exteriority over interiority
3.3. Pulling phenomenology back to its Kantian roots
3.4. Ethics
3.5. God?
3.6. Echoes of the conversion
4. The Art of Nature
4.1. To show and not to tell
4.2. Natural beauty
4.3. Immediate mediation
4.4. Movement and narrative
4.5. Mechanism as the background for freedom
5. Ethics at the Heart of Aesthetics
5.1. On abjection: The Wages of Fear
5.2. Films with a soul
5.3. Tragedy
5.4. Solitude morale
5.5. The vertiginous moment: The reversal between inside and outside
6. After Modernity: Rohmer’s Classicism and Universalism
6.1. Beyond modern art
6.2. Classic = Modern
6.3. An anti-evolutionist approach
6.4. Universalism
6.5. Authorship and mise en scène
Conclusion
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]