[ecrea] CFP You Can't Be Serious Conference, May 2013 @ McMaster University

(Apologies for Cross-Posting, Please Distribute Widely)

*CFP Deadline extended to October 15th*

Call for Papers: You Can't Be Serious

/An Exploration of the Idea, Importance and Influence of Seriousness
and Nonseriousness in the Contemporary Humanities
/
The 2013 John Douglas Taylor Conference
May 15-17, 2013
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario

Confirmed Keynotes: Jeremy Gilbert (University of East London), Julie 
Rak (University of Alberta).

Scholarship and intellectual work are serious business: serious people 
thinking seriously about serious things. To be serious is to stake a 
claim to legitimacy, importance and moral and social relevance. In 
today's academic environment, it can seem vital to reiterate the 
seriousness of one's work in order to secure promotions, positions, 
resources and even the notice of one's peers. And yet to declare 
seriousness is to deem certain topics, attachments, questions and trends 
unserious, unworthy of attention, rigorous thought and sustained debate. 
In staking our work around the unexamined metric of seriousness, what is 
lost? What questions remain unasked?

Despite its centrality to so much of our practice, the notion of 
seriousness often goes overlooked and under-thought. Indeed, while much 
effort is expended on the broad task of delimiting the borders of what 
could, should or ought to be taken seriously, the question of what 
constitutes seriousness in our current cultural moment does not receive 
nearly as much attention.

The purpose of the 2013 John Douglas Taylor Conference is to place 
seriousness front and centre: to think through seriousness, to consider 
what it is, what it means, what it might hide or efface. What is 
invested in a marker like seriousness? Is it important that we retain 
such a measure and if we were to jettison seriousness, what could 
replace it? This conference will also call attention to the unserious, 
considering the value and role of unserious topics, debates and modes of 
understanding our current cultural moment.

In this approach, we are not interested in establishing a hierarchy of 
serious and non-serious topics, or advocating a new list of topics to be 
taken seriously (though we are open to self-reflexive forms of this 
process) but, instead, in investigating how and why the impulse to 
construct such a typology works. What is the cultural hold seriousness 
has over us, how do we fight it, or do we even want to? If we seek to 
ask serious questions, how do we go about determining what these might 
be, and how do we know they're serious? How might an engagement with 
unserious methodologies and topics enrich or threaten existing knowledge?

Given that seriousness isn't the subject of any large body of existing 
scholarship, but rather a common and constant concern across all manner 
of scholarship, we welcome submissions that engage with seriousness in 
any number of theoretical, sociological, anthropological, textual, 
historical, political, activist, ethical, artistic or other methods.

*You Can't Be Serious will involve two different types of panels: the 
first will involve traditional academic papers, while the second will be 
based around roundtable discussions.
*
Morning sessions will be composed of traditional paper presentations. 
Papers may address topics and questions including, but not limited to, 
the following:

§ What does it mean to be serious and how does one determine what is 
serious?
§ Unseriousness: the trivial, the flippant, the glib, the humorous.
§ Unserious affects: boredom, irritation, amusement.
§ Living in Serious Times: 9/11, neoliberalism, global warming, 
terrorism, precarity, recession, the Euro Crisis, debt.
§ Seriousness in culture: canon formation, preservation, inspiration.
§ Why so serious? The social imperative to be serious.
§ Being taken seriously (1): marginalised identities and social status.
§ Being taken seriously (2): fandom, social media, reality TV, comic 
books, video games and Bieber Fever.
§ Being taken seriously (3): the Humanities, how we do we defend the 
value of the work undertaken in our disciplines?
§ The role of the serious in taste, value and cultural hierarchies.
§ Serious Scholarship: The rhetoric of rigour and the demands of funding.
§ Moral Seriousness: responsibility, accountability, justice.
§ We Need to Talk About... Sandusky, Santorum, Strauss-Kahn
§ Serious _______: Business, Crime, Disease, etc.
§ The aesthetics of seriousness and/or unseriousness.
§ The relation of work and play.
§ The ethics of seriousness and/or unseriousness.
§ Seriousness/unseriousness and gender: queer theory, transgender, role 
play, performance, crossing boundaries.
§ Seriousness in political discourse: activism, the Tea Party, political 
campaigning, the Arab Spring.
§ The role of the academy is determining what is serious.

Individual paper submissions should include a 500-word abstract clearly 
articulating your thesis and its relation to the conference theme. 
Please include your contact information and institutional affiliation.

It is our hope that this conference can as much spark discussion and 
debate as offer a venue by which to present research and work in 
progress. To that end, afternoon sessions will be devoted to roundtable 
discussions on themes that take up the question of seriousness within 
particular topics, fields and questions. Roundtable discussions will 
include up to five participants who will each deliver a short 
provocation (5 minutes) designed to generate further discussion between 
presenters and the audience. The purpose of these panels is to provide a 
forum to develop, as well as deliver, ideas.

The themes of the afternoon roundtable discussions are as follows:

1)     Is it (always) racist to not take race seriously?
2)     S(queer)iousness?
3)     Why don't we want to take hipsters seriously?
4)     Is Nature serious?
5)     Is there such a thing as an unserious politics?
6)     The Sokal Hoax, seventeen years on...
7)     What's more serious, the centre or the margin?
8)     Adorno got picked last in gym class: Sports and Seriousness

To apply to a roundtable discussion, please submit a 300-word response 
to one of these topics clearly indicating the question to which you are 
responding and your position. As well, please provide your contact 
information and institutional affiliation.

Please submit all proposals (paper and roundtable) via e-mail attachment 
by *October 15, 2012* to (tayconf /at/ mcmaster.ca) 
<mailto:(tayconf /at/ mcmaster.ca)> with the subject line "Taylor Conference: 
Seriousness." Attachments should be in .doc, .docx or .rtf formats.

You Can't Be Serious will take place 15-17 May 2013 at McMaster 
University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The conference is sponsored by 
the Department of English and Cultural Studies and supported by the John 
Douglas Taylor Fund.

Conference organizing committee: Nicholas Holm, Pamela Ingleton, Susie 
O'Brien and Carolyn Veldstra.