[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[ecrea] The Weekly Spin, October 18, 2006
Wed Oct 18 20:14:41 GMT 2006
>THE WEEKLY SPIN, October 18, 2006
>
>Sponsored by the nonprofit Center for Media and Democracy:
>http://www.prwatch.org
>
>To support our work now online visit:
>https://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2344-0|1118-0
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to
>further information about media, political spin and propaganda. It
>is emailed free each Wednesday to subscribers.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS)
>
>Who do you know who might want to receive "The Weekly Spin"? Help
>us grow our subscriber list! Just forward this message to people
>you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link:
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>THIS WEEK'S NEWS
>
>== BLOG POSTINGS ==
>1. New FCC Filing: Broadcasters of Fake News Make False Claims about VNR study
>2. Taking a Page (Well, Two) From History
>3. Zigging and Zagging on Cutting and Running
>
>== SPIN OF THE DAY ==
>1. Profiting from a Nonprofit Status, Thanks to Abramoff
>2. Pink Ribbons Mean Healthy Sales
>3. Field of Dreamy PR
>4. Fake News Lobby Group Gears Up
>5. Oil Company Front May Have to Disclose Contributors
>6. Legal Chill Worries Drug Bulletin
>7. Drug Ads Debate Heats Up in Europe and New Zealand
>8. On Book Tour with "The Best War Ever" - Stauber Speaks
>9. UC Follows (and Questions) the Tobacco Money
>10. Faulty Accounting
>11. UK Army Chief Drops a Bomb, Calls for End to Occupation of Iraq
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>== BLOG POSTINGS ==
>
>1. NEW FCC FILING: BROADCASTERS OF FAKE NEWS MAKE FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT VNR STUDY
>by Diane Farsetta
>
> In an October 16, 2006, letter to the Federal Communications
> Commission, Free Press and the Center for Media and Democracy
> refuted spurious claims made by the Radio-Television News Directors
> Association (RTNDA) and the National Association of Broadcast
> Communicators (NABC), a new consortium of broadcast PR firms, about
> the FCC's ongoing investigation into corporate-funded "fake news" on
> local TV stations.
>For the rest of this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5304
>
>2. TAKING A PAGE (WELL, TWO) FROM HISTORY
>by Elliott Fullmer
>
> As you may have heard by now, former Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) is not
> the first member of Congress to be involved in a congressional page
> scandal.
> Twenty-three years ago, the House Ethics Committee concluded
> that Reps. Gerry Studds (D-Mass.) and Daniel Crane (R-Ill.) had each
> engaged in sexual relationships with seventeen-year-old pages. Both
> admitted to the respective affairs, each of which had taken place
> several years earlier. While the Ethics Committee recommended only
> that the members be reprimanded, many felt that this punishment was
> not strong enough. Some, including future Speaker Newt Gingrich
> (R-Ga.), argued that each member should be expelled from the House.
>For the rest of this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5292
>
>3. ZIGGING AND ZAGGING ON CUTTING AND RUNNING
>by Sheldon Rampton
>
> The Bush administration's use of the term "cut and run" to
> caricature opponents of the war in Iraq is yet another example of
> the attention that America's war party pays to rhetorical repetition
> and linguistic framing at the expense of realistic discourse and
> analysis. Bush himself has taken to using this catchprase
> repeatedly. At a recent speech in Birmingham, Alabama, he declared
> that "The party of FDR, the party of Harry Truman, has become the
> party of cut-and-run." He repeated the charge a few days later, at a
> political fundraising breakfast for California Congressman Richard
> Pombo. "The Democrats are the party of cut and run," he said. "Ours
> is a party that has got a clear vision and says we will give our
> commanders and troops the support necessary to achieve that victory
> in Iraq."
>For the rest of this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5098
>
>== SPIN OF THE DAY ==
>
>1. PROFITING FROM A NONPROFIT STATUS, THANKS TO ABRAMOFF
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/12/AR2006101200889.html
> According to a report by the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, "five
> conservative nonprofit organizations, including one run by prominent
> Republican Grover Norquist, 'appear to have perpetrated a fraud' on
> taxpayers by selling their clout to lobbyist Jack Abramoff." The
> nonprofits are Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform, the Council of
> Republicans for Environmental Advocacy, Citizens Against Government
> Waste, the National Center for Public Policy Research, and Toward
> Tradition. The Senate report finds the groups probably violated
> their tax-exempt status, "by laundering payments and then disbursing
> funds at Mr. Abramoff's direction; taking payments in exchange for
> writing newspaper columns and press releases that put Mr. Abramoff's
> clients in a favorable light; introducing Mr. Abramoff's clients to
> government officials in exchange for payment; and agreeing to act as
> a front organization for congressional trips paid for by Mr.
> Abramoff's clients." Clients benefiting include Microsoft and
> Primedia's Channel One. Norquist's attorney countered that "there is
> no 'abuse' of ATR's tax status," as long as funds are spent in
> keeping with the mission of Americans for Tax Reform.
>SOURCE: Washington Post, October 13, 2006
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5303
>
>2. PINK RIBBONS MEAN HEALTHY SALES
>http://www.startribune.com/1244/story/739030.html
> This October is the 26th annual Breast Cancer Awareness month, an
> event "conceived by the pharmaceutical company Zeneca, now
> AstraZeneca ... to promote mammography as the most effective weapon
> in fighting breast cancer." The increasing number of pink ribbon /
> breast cancer cause-related marketing campaigns has the advocacy
> group Breast Cancer Action referring to October as "breast cancer
> industry month." Companies -- like Ty, which is offering "SpongeBob
> PinkPants" this October -- point out that they raise money for
> breast cancer research. "In 2005 alone, cause-related marketing
> generated more than $30 million for research and community programs
> for the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation," reports Josephine
> Marcotty. Pink marketing also helps companies' bottom lines.
> Advertising Age reports that "by turning its iconic red-and-white
> soup cans pink for Breast Cancer Awareness Month, Campbell Soup Co.
> has doubled sales of its top varieties to its biggest grocery
> customer. ... [Campbell spokesman John] Faulkner said he would 'love
> to see the program expanded greatly next year.'"
>SOURCE: Star Tribune (Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN), October 13, 2006
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5302
>
>3. FIELD OF DREAMY PR
>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/11/sports/baseball/11sox.html
> The sport of baseball got its reputation as a "Field of Dreams," in
> part, because the game is played outside of time. There is a nominal
> starting time, but no game clock. Once endorsement deals became as
> fashionable as designer steroids, everything else went up for sale.
> Last week, reports Richard Sandomir, the Chicago White Sox literally
> sold their starting time for $500,000 per year, so that convenience
> store chain 7-Eleven could get a little more PR. For the next three
> seasons, the approximately 50 night games on Chicago's South Side
> will be scheduled to begin at exactly 7:11 p.m. "Every time the
> media announces the game's start time it will be a gentle reminder
> of our sponsorship," 7-Eleven spokesperson Margaret Chabris said of
> the games. In 2003, the White Sox sold stadium naming rights to U.S.
> Cellular for $68 million, upon which the Chicago wireless service
> provider's nameplate replaced iconic Comiskey Park (named for the
> former team owner and ballplayer). There was no word at press time
> whether players will also be required to "Thank Heaven for 7-Eleven"
> or sip on a Slurpee before they step up to the plate.
>SOURCE: The New York Times, October 11, 2006
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5293
>
>4. FAKE NEWS LOBBY GROUP GEARS UP
>http://www.prweek.com/us/news/article/598664/Broadcast-PR-companies-unite-amid-ongoing-scrutiny-VNRs/
>
> A group of producers of video news releases (VNRs) have formed the
> National Association of Broadcast Communicators (NABC) to campaign
> against the mandatory disclosure of fake news. NABC Vice-President
> Mike Hill, who is is President of News Broadcast Network, told PR
> Week that "disclosure is something that TV and radio stations should
> do as they feel necessary from a news standpoint." Mandatory
> disclosure, Hill claimed, "would be unworkable." The new group is
> supported by the Public Relations Society of America. "We all play
> an important role in the news gathering and dissemination process,"
> said Michael Cherenson, the chair of PRSA's advocacy practice. NABC
> has hired the Washington D.C. law firm Keller and Heckman and the
> lobbying firm Bryan Cave Strategies to counter a Federal
> Communications Commission investigation into the use of VNRs. On
> October 16, Keller and Heckman filed a comment with FCC Chair Martin
> on behalf of NABC that claims that the Center for Media and
> Democracy's "Fake TV News" report "unfairly tarnishes a host of
> broadcasters along with the entire VNR industry."
>SOURCE: PR Week (sub req'd), October 13, 2006
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5301
>
>5. OIL COMPANY FRONT MAY HAVE TO DISCLOSE CONTRIBUTORS
>http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4254066.html
> Alaska's Future, is a front group which, according to its former
> president, was created by BP, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips. The
> group may be required to disclose its funders and other financial
> information, following a three-hour hearing by the Alaska Public
> Offices Commission. Even though commission staff recommended
> dismissing a complaint brought against the group, the Commissioners
> decided they wanted to consider the matter further. The group was
> originally formed to promote a proposal for a pipeline that would
> serve the three companies. More recently, the group has run
> television advertisements opposing a ballot initiative that would
> tax the leaseholders of gas reserves $1 billion a year until a gas
> pipeline is built. In September, BP spokesman Daren Beaudo told the
> Anchorage Daily News that the company only intended to disclose what
> it spent on the campaign after the election.
>SOURCE: Houston Chronicle, October 12, 2006
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5300
>
>6. LEGAL CHILL WORRIES DRUG BULLETIN
>http://www.australianprescriber.com/magazine/29/5/artid/828/
> The case of a judge granting an injunction to prevent a group of
> medical professionals publishing a critical review of the herbal
> drug Tebonin has the editor of a major drug bulletin worried. The
> editor of Australian Prescriber, John Dowden, notes that in two
> other instances where drug companies sued drug bulletins, the
> judgements favoured the publishers. In the Tebonin case, Justice
> Andrew Greenwood decided that as a copy of the draft report had been
> sent to the government regulator, granting of an injunction would
> not harm the public interest. "Unfortunately, the Department of
> Health and Ageing has said that any investigation by the TGA
> [Therapeutic Goods Administration] will be commercial-in-confidence
> and the results will not be disclosed to the public," Dowden writes.
> It is time, he suggests, that the health supplement industry opened
> itself up to greater scrutiny of its products.
>SOURCE: Australian Prescriber, October 2006
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5299
>
>7. DRUG ADS DEBATE HEATS UP IN EUROPE AND NEW ZEALAND
>http://66.71.191.169/isdbweb/pag/documents/DeclarationInfoPatientFINAL2909.pdf
> A coalition of European health groups, including the International
> Society of Drug Bulletins and the Medicines in Europe Forum, is
> alarmed at a renewed campaign by the drug industry to lift the ban
> on direct-to-consumer advertising in Europe. While acknowledging
> consumer information about health is essential, the groups are
> concerned that backdoor direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA)
> through "disease awareness" campaigns and the direct or indirect
> funding of patient groups by drug companies "have blurred the
> boundaries between drug promotion and health information." They
> argue that there "needs to be a clear distinction between
> information and advertising that is disguised as 'information.'"
> Meanwhile, the New Zealand Minister for Health, Pete Hodgson, has
> said that he will shortly announce a decision on a review of DTCA
> advertising. New Zealand and the U.S. are the only countries which
> currently allow DTCA ads. Public health groups are urging the
> government to ban the ads.
>SOURCE: Health Action International Europe, October 2006 (pdf file)
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5298
>
>8. ON BOOK TOUR WITH "THE BEST WAR EVER" - STAUBER SPEAKS
>http://youtube.com/watch?v=7qAEaSIubAs
> CMD executive director John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton, co-authors
> of The Best War Ever: Lies, Damned Lies and the Mess in Iraq, have
> been barnstorming the country talking in classrooms, bookstores,
> homes, on radio and TV programs, and in interviews with print
> journalists. Here is footage of one of Stauber's early interviews
> given on September 18th in Seattle at radio station KEXP-FM to its
> "Mind Over Matters" program host Mike McCormick. (When Stauber's
> co-author Rampton saw this half-hour interview his response was,
> "Boy, can that guy blab." Stauber's response: "It must have been the
> coffee.") Note the number of Iraqi deaths Stauber cites: 100,000.
> This was a month before the horrific news that the number of Iraqis
> killed since the US invasion is now better estimated at more than
> 600,000 and climbing. Here is an interview Stauber gave to the
> Portland, Oregon, weekly newspaper that ran in advance of his talk
> in that city, and click here to view Stauber's September book talk
> in Berkeley at Cody's bookstore. For other book-related reviews and
> interviews, go to the official book page: The Best War Ever: Lies,
> Damned Lies and the Mess in Iraq .
>SOURCE: YouTube
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5297
>
>9. UC FOLLOWS (AND QUESTIONS) THE TOBACCO MONEY
>http://www.today.ucla.edu/news/061010_tobacco-funds/
> The University of California system is debating whether UC schools
> should continue to accept research funding from tobacco companies.
> Proponents of the funding invoke the slippery-slope argument, saying
> if UC refuses tobacco funds, then pharmaceutical companies might be
> next. Others argue that eliminating tobacco funding would infringe
> on academics? freedom of speech. In August 2006, a federal court
> found major U.S. tobacco companies guilty of committing fraud,
> conspiracy and racketeering over four decades, in an effort to
> create doubt in the public?s mind about health harms from tobacco
> smoke. The court ruling focused on the fact that tobacco industry
> funding of research at prestigious medical schools and universities
> was essential to its illegal enterprise. Others found guilty of
> unrelated fraud charges include former Illinois governor George
> Ryan, former Enron executives Jeffrey Skilling and Kenneth Lay, and
> former WorldCom CEO Bernard Ebbers. The University of California
> regents might ask whether it would be appropriate to accept funding
> from these other offenders, who committed similar crimes as the
> tobacco industry, but over far shorter amounts of time and resulting
> in far fewer deaths.
>SOURCE: UCLA Today, October 10, 2006
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5296
>
>10. FAULTY ACCOUNTING
>http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1920016,00.html
> The British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has upheld a
> complaint against a Scottish energy utility that claimed that a tree
> planting scheme funded by consumers volunteering to pay a higher
> tariff would offset their carbon emissions. The ASA told Scottish &
> Southern Energy (SSE) to withdraw a brochure promoting the scheme.
> SSE had argued that the average household produced 4.65 tonnes of
> carbon dioxide a year from gas usage and household waste. "But,"
> Miles Brignall reported, "the ASA said it failed to prove that the
> new trees absorbed the equivalent amount of greenhouse gases." The
> decision may impact other companies, too. The oil giant BP recently
> unveiled its targetneutral scheme, Ford USA and Ford Land Rover have
> launched Terrapass, and British Airways has teamed up with Climate
> Care.
>SOURCE: Guardian (UK), October 12, 2006
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5295
>
>11. UK ARMY CHIEF DROPS A BOMB, CALLS FOR END TO OCCUPATION OF IRAQ
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=410163&in_page_id=1770&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&ic
> The head of the UK army has dropped a political and public relations
> bomb on the occupation of Iraq, blowing to bits the upbeat,
> stay-the-course talking points of the Blair and Bush
> administrations. According to an interview in The Daily Mail, "The
> head of the Army is calling for British troops to withdraw from Iraq
> 'soon' or risk catastophic consequences for both Iraq and British
> society. In a devastating broadside at Tony Blair's foreign policy,
> General Sir Richard Dannatt stated explicitly that the continuing
> presence of British troops 'exacerbates the security problems' in
> Iraq. ... Sir Richard, who took up his post earlier this year,
> warned that 'our presence in Iraq exacerbates' the 'difficulties we
> are facing around the world.' He lambasts Tony Blair's desire to
> forge a 'liberal democracy' in Iraq as a 'naive' failure and he
> warns that 'whatever consent we may have had in the first place'
> from the Iraqi people 'has largely turned to intolerance.' Liberal
> Democrat Foreign Affairs spokesman Michael Moore said: 'This is the
> frankest assessment we have had about Iraq. It illustrates that the
> government has no clear strategy.' The party's defense spokesman
> Nick Harvey added: 'This drives a coach and horses through the
> government's foreign policy.'"
>SOURCE: The Daily Mail (UK), October 12, 2006
>For more information or to comment on this story, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/node/5294
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at the Center
>for Media and Democracy (CMD), a nonprofit public interest
>organization. To subscribe, visit:
>http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/subscribe_sotd.html
>
>To unsubscribe, visit:
>http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/cmd/unsubscribe.jsp?unsubscribe
>
>Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found in the "Spin of
>the Day" section of CMD's website:
>http://www.prwatch.org/spin
>
>Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at:
>http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues
>
>CMD also sponsors SourceWatch, a collaborative research project
>that invites anyone (including you) to contribute and edit
>articles. For more information, visit:
>http://www.sourcewatch.org
>
>PR Watch, Spin of the Day, the Weekly Spin and SourceWatch are
>projects of the Center for Media & Democracy, a nonprofit
>organization that offers investigative reporting on the public
>relations industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and
>misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of secretive,
>little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that work to control
>political debates and public opinion. Please send any questions or
>suggestions about our publications to:
>(editor /at/ prwatch.org)
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Contributions to the Center for Media and Democracy are
>tax-deductible. Send checks to:
>CMD
>520 University Avenue, Suite 227
>Madison, WI 53703
>
>To donate now online, visit:
>https://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2344-0|1118-0
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>To unsubscribe, visit:
>http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/cmd/unsubscribe.jsp?unsubscribe
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carpentier Nico (Phd)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Free University of Brussels
Centre for Studies on Media and Culture (CeMeSO)
Pleinlaan 2 - B-1050 Brussels - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-629.18.56
F: ++ 32 (0)2-629.28.61
Office: 5B.401a
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Katholieke Universiteit Brussel - Catholic University of Brussels
Vrijheidslaan 17 - B-1081 Brussel - Belgium
T: ++ 32 (0)2-412.42.78
F: ++ 32 (0)2/412.42.00
Office: 4/0/18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
European Communication Research and Education Association
Web: http://www.ecrea.eu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mail: (Nico.Carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
Web: http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~ncarpent/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
ECREA-Mailing list
----------------
!!!!!!NEW!!!!!!!!
ECREA Communication Doctoral Summer School information at:
http://www.comsummerschool.org/ &
http://www.ecrea.eu/summer.html
---
This mailing list is a free service from ECREA.
---
To unsubscribe, send an email message to (majordomo /at/ listserv.vub.ac.be)
with in the body of the message (NOT in the subject): unsubscribe ecrea
---
ECREA - European Communication Research and Education Association
Postal address: ECREA - P.O. Box 106, B-1210 Brussels 21, Belgium
Email: (ecrea /at/ ulb.ac.be)
URL: http://www.ecrea.eu
----------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]