[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[Commlist] CfP "Representations of (Post-)Industrial Communities: Voice, Visibility and Value" - Global Media Journal - German Edition
Fri Sep 11 09:55:05 GMT 2026
**Call for Contributions for a Special Section of GLOBAL MEDIA JOURNAL -
GERMAN EDITION – Summer 2027*
**Representations of (Post-)Industrial Communities: Voice, Visibility
and Value**
Deadline for full paper submissions: 15 January 2027
Guest Editors:
Anke Fiedler, Universität Greifswald
Darren Lilleker, Bournemouth University
James Morrison, University of Stirling
Industrialization across the globe, and particularly in North America
and Europe, was associated with profound societal transformations, most
notably the urbanization of populations and the creation of mass
workforces (Cowie & Heathcott, 2003). Across generations, many families
expected their children to follow established occupational trajectories
into mines, steelworks, docks, mills, and factories (cf. Gildea, 2023).
For much of the twentieth century, heavy industries offered relatively
stable employment, social security, and a decent standard of living,
contributing to gradual improvements in working-class conditions up to
the 1960s (Russo & Linkon, 2009).
Deindustrialization, by contrast, has often been experienced as a
process of decline and loss – in economic, social and cultural terms. As
industries disappeared, so too did the social infrastructures that
sustained everyday life (Cowie & Heathcott 2003; Russo & Linkon 2009).
Urban spaces fell into decay, amenities declined, and the voices, values
and identities of communities were increasingly marginalized within
broader national imaginaries. The result has been a growing sense of
diminishing pride, security, self-worth and trust among post-industrial
working-class communities (Cowie & Heathcott, 2003), which continues to
shape experiences of being voiceless, unrepresented, and neglected
(Emery, 2018). In a number of contexts, such experiences have also
provided fertile ground for neo-authoritarian movements – including
illiberal, anti-democratic, nationalist, and populist ones
(Rodríguez-Pose et al., 2018, 2023) – which mobilize narratives of loss,
resentment, and national re-framing (Emery, 2018; Morrison, 2022).
These dynamics have been particularly pronounced in major industrial
regions that later experienced significant decline, such as the Rust
Belt in the United States (Campbell, 2017; Cowie & Heathcott, 2003) as
well as Northern England and the German coal regions (bpb, 2021).
Comparable processes of political radicalization can be observed across
Europe, in regions shaped by different political and economic systems
(Rodríguez-Pose et al., 2018, 2023). These include both long-established
capitalist economies as well as former state-socialist contexts, such as
Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Wallonia, and Upper Silesia (Domański, 2015;
Leboutte, 2009).
This special issue seeks to explore these dynamics by examining the
media, political and wider public communicative processes around
(de-)industrialization. It aims to take a pluralist approach to
industrial transformation, attending both to macro-level public
discourses and to the lived experiences of communities navigating
industrial decline and post-industrial restructuring, along with the
political responses to these developments. By foregrounding
communication as a central site through which industrial transformation
and political challenges are interpreted, negotiated, contested, and
experienced, the special issue invites critical engagement with
questions of inclusion/exclusion, voice, visibility, (mis/under-)
representation and inequality in societies shaped by ongoing processes
of deindustrialization.
We welcome submissions from scholars across disciplines and regions,
including historical and contemporary analyses, that address
communication processes around (de-)industrialization. Submissions may
engage with, but are not limited to, the following research areas:
• Public discourse: The role of mass media, political
communication, popular culture and wider public debate in shaping
narratives of industrial change, decline, renewal, and loss.
• Everyday/interpersonal communication: Constructions and
experiences of loss, value and belonging by affected communities and
practices through which they articulate, negotiate or resist dominant
public representations; communicative practices of memory, identity and
belonging; political attitudes/orientations among (post)-industrial
communities.
• Media structures and representation: Structural absences
and inequalities in media institutions, including the exclusion and/or
mis/under-representation of working-class voices in media production,
ownership and decision-making, and the implications of these absences
for public visibility, voice and the recognition (or denial) of lived
experience.
• Journalism: Journalistic practices, norms, routines and
cultures in sourcing and reporting stories about the impact and
implications of industrial transformation and communities affected;
relationships between journalists and deindustrialized communities;
authority, authenticity and legitimacy of competing voices in
representing working-class lives.
• Data, digitization, and media technologies: The role of
digital platforms, data practices, automation, algorithmic systems and
generative AI in reshaping visibility, value and participation; the
communicative implications of platformization for post-industrial work
and community life.
• Media use and reception: Media use and communication by
affected communities that is directed at making sense of industrial
change; levels and forms of media reception and (dis-)engagement among
(post-)industrial communities, agenda-setting and media effects; use of
participatory, community and/or alternative media and information sources.
• Theoretical and methodological considerations: Conceptual
and methodological approaches to researching the mediation of
deindustrialized and marginalized communities in the digital era,
including ethical questions of access, voice, representation and
participation in communication research itself.
This special section follows the pre-conference, “Representations of
(Post-) Industrial Communities: Voice, Visibility, and Value,” hosted by
the IAMCR Communication in Post- and Neo-Authoritarian Societies Working
Group on June 27, 2026, in Dublin. Funding for language editing and
proofreading will be provided by the IAMCR Section/Working Group Project
Fund.
*Requirements for Submitting Contributions to the German Edition
Contribution formats*
Academic articles (peer-reviewed); essays; media practice & research
reports; graduate section; interviews
*Style Guide & Submissions Requirements*
• Please adhere strictly to Global Media Journal – German
Edition formatting and APA 7th edition citation style.
• Manuscript lengths depend on the chosen contribution
format:
https://www.globalmediajournal.de/index.php/gmj/submission-guidelines
• Please refer to the Style Guide for GMJ
• All submissions for academic articles will undergo
double-blind peer review.
• GMJ-DE is Diamond Open Access; no APCs (no author
processing charges)
*Full manuscript submission*
• Full manuscripts should be submitted via the journal’s
website _www.globalmediajournal.de <http://www.globalmediajournal.de>_
by 15 January 2027.
• Please select “Special Section Representations of
(Post-)Industrial Communities: Voice, Visibility and Value” in the
drop-down list when submitting your manuscript.
*Timetable*
• Submission of full papers: 15 January 2027
• Response to authors (first review): 31 March 2027
• Publication date: July 2027
If you have any questions, please contact GMJ-DE editor Katharina
Nötzold ((gmj /at/ polsoz.fu-berlin.de))
The GLOBAL MEDIA JOURNAL – GERMAN EDITION (ISSN 2196-4807) is a diamond
open access, peer-reviewed journal for the publication of scholarly
contributions dealing with issues of international, transnational,
intercultural and transcultural communication and media, published in
English and German twice a year. No article processing charges (APCs)
are incurred. The journal is indexed in DOAJ, ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, EuroPub,
BASE and Ulrich’s. Website: https://www.globalmediajournal.de
*References*
bpb [Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung] (Ed.). (2021). Abschied von
der Kohle: Struktur- und Kulturwandel im Ruhrgebiet und in der Lausitz
[Farewell to coal: Structural and cultural change in the Ruhr region and
Lusatia]. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
Campbell, C. (2017). Revitalizing the Rust Belt. American Affairs, 1(4),
130–139.
Cowie, J., & Heathcott, J. (2003). Introduction: The meanings of
deindustrialisation. In J. Cowie & J. Heathcott (Eds.), Beyond the
ruins: The meanings of deindustrialization (pp. 1–18). Cornell
University Press.
Domański, B. (2015). Contemporary processes of regional industrial
changes in Poland—Possible interpretations. Studies of the Industrial
Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society, 29(4), 40–53.
https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.294.3
Emery, J. (2019). Geographies of deindustrialization and the
working-class: Industrial ruination, legacies, and affect. Geography
Compass, 13, e12417. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12417
Gildea, R. (2023). Backbone of the nation: Mining communities and the
Great Strike of 1984–85. Yale University Press.
Leboutte, R. (2009). A space of European de-industrialisation in the
late twentieth century: Nord/Pas-de-Calais, Wallonia and the Ruhrgebiet.
European Review of History: Revue Européenne d'Histoire, 16(5), 755–770.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13507480903262785
Morrison, J. (2022). The left behind: Reimagining Britain's socially
excluded. Pluto Press.
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don't matter
(and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and
Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
Rodríguez-Pose, A., Terrero-Dávila, J., & Lee, N. (2023). Left-behind
versus unequal places: Interpersonal inequality, economic decline and
the rise of populism in the USA and Europe. Journal of Economic
Geography, 23(5), 951–977. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbad005
Russo, J., & Linkon, S. (2009). The social costs of deindustrialization.
In R. McCormack (Ed.), Manufacturing a better future for America (pp.
149–174). Alliance for American Manufacturing.
---------------
The COMMLIST
---------------
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely. The commlist has no responsibility for any damage caused by its postings. Subscription to the list automatically implies agreement with this rule.
--
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://commlist.org/
--
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at http://commlist.org/
--
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ commlist.org)
URL: http://nicocarpentier.net
---------------
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]