Archive for 2020

[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]

[Commlist] Special Edition on Failure and Cultural Participation - Deadline: Strike Update

Fri Feb 21 21:21:55 GMT 2020

The deadline for articles for our special edition on failure is March 15, 2020. further details can be found at or below. HOWEVER, if you are a UK based academic who plans to submit a paper for consideration but this date will now be problematic because of the ongoing strike action please email (dstevenson /at/ to let me know and I can agree an extended deadline. Patterns of cultural participation have been the focus of policy research for decades. Particularly since the millennium, quantitative data, often collected by governments, has established the notion of ‘non-participation’ as a ‘problem’ that the state needs to address (Balling and Kann-Christensen, 2013; Jancovich 2015 Stevenson, 2013, Stevenson et al., 2015). Yet despite decades of policies and projects to address this and a growing body of research, carried out by consultants and academics, celebrating the success of such interventions in addressing social inclusion and increasing personal wellbeing, the same ‘problem’ appears to remain in regard to the diversity of people who engage with state supported cultural organisations and activities (Warwick Commission, 2015). It has even been claimed that Europe is becoming it is becoming a “less cultural continent” (European Commission, 2013).

The way in which many projects, organisation and artists are funded and evaluated, combined with the state of financial precarity in which a large number permanently function, means that stories of failure about how cultural participation policies and projects have been enacted are largely overlooked and even suppressed in the dominant discourses of cultural policy. This limits and reduces the capacity for “social learning” (May 1992) which may better facilitate change. Without an honest acknowledgement and critically reflective exploration into the nature and extent of failure present in the existing projects and policies by which cultural participation is supposedly supported, then the legitimacy of the status quo will remain difficult to challenge.

This special edition of Conjunctions invites contributions that explore the role and place of failure in regard to cultural participation. We invite empirical, theoretical and practice informed contributions from across a range of disciplines. Topics may include, but need not be confined to, the following:

- The value and role of recognising, understanding and learning from failure for cultural policymaking OR for cultural objects, artefacts and activities - Defining and recognising failure in cultural participation projects/policies
- Cases studies of failure in cultural participation projects/policies
- The politics of failure in cultural participation projects/policies
- The morality and ethics of failure in regard to cultural participation projects/policies
- Evaluating and reporting on failure
- The relationship between quality and failure in delivering cultural projects
- Framing failure in evaluations
- Discourses of failure and success in cultural policy/cultural practice

Articles should be between 6000-8000 words, including endnotes, captions and headings. All articles will undergo blind peer review for final selection in the special edition

Any questions related to this special edition can be sent to the guest editors:

Dr Leila Jancovich: (l.jancovich /at/

Dr David Stevenson: (dstevenson /at/

Submissions can be made at:

This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier. Please use it responsibly and wisely.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit
Before sending a posting request, please always read the guidelines at
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/

[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]