[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]
[ecrea] Call for papers Seminar Gender and controversies online Lyon 2016 ELICO
Thu Jul 23 02:37:55 GMT 2015
Call for papers
Seminar Gender and controversies online
January - June 2016 / Lyon (France)
ISH â IXXI
Gender, as a theoretical tool which challenges the idea of âsex
differencesâ and raises awareness on gender-based discriminations, is
being debated, discussed, and subjected to several conflicts of
definition, which also embrace whom is entitled to define the concept
and which themes are covered by it. The concept of gender, as well as
gender-related theory, have been controversial for a long time. This
polemic is linked to the ancient controversy around âsex differencesâ.
Therefore, the study of gender in the public sphere has to take into
consideration present polemics and previous controversies.
This seminar takes place within the context of current research on data
science applied to online controversies and the online public sphere. In
which ways do digital devices heighten the controversies? How do they
allow the researchers to observe new polemical relations? Does the
amount of online discursive data allow the observation of different
The specific type of interactions developed within the online public
sphere (digital identities and communication patterns) tend to lead to
polemical uses (smear campaigns, thematic hashtagsâ¦) but also
paradoxically to dilute political stakes and critical charge of feminist
The goal and stake of this seminar are to understand in which way
specific online modes of interaction (pseudonymity, short temporality,
âcascade effectâ) may contribute to gender-related polemics, to the
conflict of definition around the concept of gender, but also to the
erosion of the conceptâs critical edge. Online public sphere is often
compared to places where opinions are being confronted, but it rather
supports âdebates by dissociationâ, debates in which divergent opinions
grow in a parallel way instead of really confronting each other. This
leads to the outcome of high-magnitude debates, debates in which the
original confrontation of ideas is diluted in a multitude of
micro-debates fed by a vast number of contributors.
Studying the discourse on gender in different instances allows to
capture issues related to the sociology of networks, to social and
linguistic conservatisms, to the disaffection of some part of the public
for certain media and the development - or the obsolescence - of certain
discursive practices. In this perspective, we will take into account
proposals about gender-related issues and their comments on the online
versions of mainstream media, on pure players, on social networks, on
feminist blogs and forums as well as on media and blogs focusing on the
theme of "gender theory" to confront it.
The analysis of the anchor points of definitions that are emerging in
the digital space, by articulating explicit and implicit dimensions,
allows to understand how the discourse on gender remains unstable : it
can renew itself while continuing to convey traditional representations.
One goal of this seminar is to strengthen dialogue and collaboration
between researchers from various disciplinary backgrounds (communication
and medias studies, law, linguistics, political science, sociology,
computer science...), to connect the methods and knowledge of
controversies in digital spaces - while underlining the specificity of
these digital spaces and device in the light of political controversy
and polemics that update and feed it by impacting the social body.
Indeed, the different methods of discourse analysis, as well as computer
science, media sociology, semiotics, are all possible approaches to
seize how this controversy is deployed and reconfigured in various
digital spaces and device.
These approaches are also all confronted to the labile unsteady and
polymorphous dimension of discourses that are involved in gender
controversies, as well as their polyphony. This seminar not only aims to
sustain dialogue between researchers on gender and controversies, online
public sphere and opinion mining, but also offers more visibility to new
collaborations and emerging researches, by contributing to a collective
publication at the end of this seminar.
This seminar will be organized around four themes:
Theme 1 (January, 29th 2016) : Polyphony in the discourses about Gender
: social liberalism, Gender backlash, New Definitions, dilution
Online discourses about Gender are very polyphonic. There are at the
same time liberal talks (in spontaneous campaigns online to support the
victims of discriminations), conservative backlashes (demonstrations
against gay wedding, lad culture), and the diminution of feminist
criticism (Pop feminism). Analysing this kind of contents, we would like
to adopt a perspective inspired by Cultural Studies to study the
representations at stake and the movement of those issues - in spheres
different than from institutions or activists. How the digital spaces
could be a pace for the raising of new forms of discourse on gender.
Theme 2 (March, 11th 2016) : Cyberbullying and prevention
Since online violence (symbolic and verbal) has its specificities,
scholar investigate gender-based violence through the analysis of
cyberbullying. Online violence affects particularly women and sexual
minorities : harassment, slander, revenge porn, homophobic slurs,
disclosure of sexually explicit pictures without consent, geolocation
and monitoring... How does cyberbullying replicate on a larger scale the
traditional forms of gender violence, how is it different? Could it be
possible to use digital devices to raise awareness about gender-based
violence and prevent it.
Theme 3 (April, 1st 2016) : A quantitative analysis of Gender
representation in digital spaces ?
Gender could be a very relevant issue to analyse the conflicts in
definition and to measure, in a quantitative and qualitative ways, the
stereotypes and social roles. This theme aims to confront statistical
approaches on complex and big data. How can such approaches be adapted
to an algorithmic approach? How do they depend on a preliminary
qualitative study, in order to determine the categories of analysis? Is
it really possible to Â« measure Â» Gender online ?
Theme 4 (May, 27th, 2016) : Feminism and antifeminism online
In this session, we want to study more structured uses of digital
spaces, specifically from activists and / or institutions. Online media
provide an efficient sphere for activists speeches (feminists,
anti-feminists, masculinists, conservative religious groups) to seem
more structured and focused for Government actions for women to be more
visible. What are feminist and antifeminist strategies to enter digital
spaces ? In which way do the analysis of digital activism tools and
devices allow us to analyse the structure of the controversy about Gender ?
Submission details :
The seminar Gender and controversies on line revolves around four
sessions between January and June 2016. It takes the form of conferences
on four days with one invited speaker per thematic session. Ther
presentations wil be French and in English (a simultaneous translation
will be set). In addition to these speakers, we wish to open this
seminar to other point of views.
Submission deadline : september 15th, 2015.
Paper format : an abstract of no more than 450 words (bibliography
included) + a short bio-bibliographie (200-250 words) + the preference
for one of the four themes.
Submissions are welcomed from all disciplines, and we would particularly
encourage PhD students and early career researchers to apply.
There are no other requirements with regard to the format.
Papers must be uploaded on an EasyChair platform :
Scientific committee (in progress)
AurÃ©lie Olivesi (ELICO)
Isabelle Hare (ELICO)
StÃ©phanie Kunert (ELICO)
For any question or for further information, please mail us :
F. Benamara, C. Cesarano, A. Picariello, D.Reforgiato, and V.
Subrahmanian.Sentiment analysis : Adjectives and adverbs are better than
adjectives alone. In International Conference on Weblogs and SocialMedia
(ICWSM), Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A, 26/03/2007-28/03/2007, p.
203â206,http://www.aaai.org/Press/press.php, 2007. AAAI Press.
A. E. Berger, Â« Petite histoire paradoxale des Ã©tudes dites de âgenreâ
en France Â», Le franÃ§ais aujourd'hui, 2008/4 nÂ° 163, p. 83-91.
M. Bessin, E. Dorlin, Â« Les renouvellements gÃ©nÃ©rationnels du fÃ©minisme
: mais pour quel sujet politique ? Â», L'Homme et la sociÃ©tÃ©, 2005/4 nÂ°
158, p. 11-27.
L. Blondiaux, Â« Ce que les sondages font Ã l'opinion publique Â»,
Politix, AnnÃ©e 1997, Vol. 10, nÂ° 37 p. 117 - 136
J. Butler, Â« âLes femmesâ en tant que sujet du fÃ©minisme Â», Raisons
politiques, 2003/4 nÂ° 12, p. 85-97.
M. Coulomb-Gully, Â« Les sciences de la communication : une discipline
gender blind ? Â», Questions de communication, nÂ° 15, 2009, p. 129-153
T. de Lauretis, ThÃ©rorie queer et cultures populaires, Paris, La
A. Dister, M.-L. Moreau, Â« âDis-moi comment tu fÃ©minises, je te dirai
pour qui tu votes.â Les dÃ©nominations des candidates dans les Ã©lections
europÃ©ennes de 1989 et de 2004 en Belgique et en France Â», Langages &
sociÃ©tÃ© 2006/1, nÂ° 115, p. 5-45.
O. Ducrot, Le dire et le dit, Paris, Minuit, 1985
F. Dupuis-DÃ©ri, Â« Le discours de la âcrise de la masculinitÃ©â comme
refus de l'Ã©galitÃ© entre les sexes : histoire d'une rhÃ©torique
antifÃ©ministe Â», Cahiers du Genre, 2012/1 nÂ° 52, p. 119-143
E. Eensoo-Ramdani Egle et al., Â« De la fouille de donnÃ©es Ã la fabrique
de l'opinion Â» Enjeux Ã©pistÃ©mologiques et propositions, Les Cahiers du
numÃ©rique, 2011/2 Vol. 7, p. 15-40.
E. Fassin, Lâempire du genre.Lâhistoire politique ambiguÃ« dâun outil
conceptuel, LâHomme 2008/3-4, nÂ° 187-188, p. 375-392.
P. Flichy, Â« Internet et le dÃ©bat dÃ©mocratique Â», RÃ©seaux, 2008/4, nÂ°
150, p. 159-185
F. Gaspard, Â« LâantifÃ©minisme en politique Â», Un siÃ¨cle
F. Greffet, S. Wojcik, Â« Parler politique en ligne. Une revue des
travaux franÃ§ais et anglo-saxons Â», RÃ©seaux nÂ° 150, 2008/4, p. 19-50
J. Habermas, Â« L'espace public, 30 ans aprÃ¨s Â», Quaderni. nÂ° 18, Automne
1992. p. 161-191.
M. Hu and B. Liu.Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In KDD â04 :
Proceedings of the tenthACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge
discovery and data mining,pages 168â177, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
C. Kaiser, J. Krockel, and F. Bodendorf, âSwarmintelligence for
analyzing opinions in online communitiesâ, Hawaii International
Conference on System Sciences, 0 :1â9, 2010
M. Kara, Â« Reformulations et polyphonie Â», Pratiques, nÂ° 123/124,
E. LÃ©pinard, Â« âMalaise dans le conceptâ DiffÃ©rence, identitÃ© et
fÃ©ministe Â», Cahiers du Genre, nÂ° 39, 2005/2, p. 107-135.
B. Liu, âOpinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis: NLP Meets Social
Sciencesâ, STSC, 2010, Hawaii, USA
A. Mac Mahon, Â« Lectures masculines de la thÃ©orie fÃ©ministe : la
psychologisation des rapports de genre dans la littÃ©rature sur la
masculinitÃ© Â», L'Homme et la sociÃ©tÃ©, 2005/4 nÂ° 158,p. 27-51
E. Marty, F. Rebillard, N. Smyrnaios, A. Touboul A., Â« VariÃ©tÃ© et
distribution des sujets dâactualitÃ© sur lâinternet. Une analyse
quantitative de lâinformation en ligne Â», Mots - Les langages du
politique, ENS Ãditions, nÂ° 93, 2010, p. 107-126
F. Matonti, Â« Les mots pour (ne pas) le dire. Viol, consentement,
harcÃ¨lement : les mÃ©dias face aux affaires Strauss-Kahn Â», Raisons
politiques, 2012/2 nÂ° 46, p. 13-45
P. Molinier, DÃ©construire la crise de la masculinitÃ©, Mouvements nÂ°31,
Janvier-fÃ©vrier 2004, p. 24-29
P. OlÃ©ron, Â« Sur lâargumentation polÃ©mique Â», HermÃ¨s, nÂ°16, p.15-27
B. Pang, L. Lee, S. Vaithyanathan, âThumbs up ?: sentiment
classification using machine learning techniques. In EMNLP â02 :
Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural
language processing, pages 79â86,Morristown, NJ, USA, 2002. Association
for Computational Linguistics
B. Pang and L. Lee. A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using
subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In ACL â04 :
Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational
Linguistics, page 271, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2004. Association for
B. Rieder, N. Smyrnaios, Â« Pluralisme et infomÃ©diation sociale de
l'actualitÃ© : le cas de TwitterÂ», RÃ©seaux, 2012/6, nÂ°176, p. 105-139
C. Terzi, A. Bovet, Â« La composante narrative des controverses
politiques et mÃ©diatiques. Pour une analyse
praxÃ©ologique des actions et des mobilisations collectives Â», RÃ©seaux
2005/4, nÂ° 132, p. 111-132
F. Villemur, Â« PensÃ©e queer et mÃ©lancolie du genre Â», Cahiers du Genre,
2007/2 nÂ° 43, p. 153-169
D. Zerbib, Â« Le masculin et la performance de l'universel Â», Cahiers du
Genre, 2007/2 nÂ° 43, p. 187-210
This mailing list is a free service offered by Nico Carpentier and ECREA.
To subscribe, post or unsubscribe, please visit
To contact the mailing list manager:
Email: (nico.carpentier /at/ vub.ac.be)
ECREA - European Communication Research and Education Association
Chauss�de Waterloo 1151, 1180 Uccle, Belgium
Email: (info /at/ ecrea.eu)
[Previous message][Next message][Back to index]